- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:14 am to Tigereye10005
quote:Schumer claims this may be basis for a filibuster of Trump's SCOTUS nominee.
Appeals Court Rejects Request to Immediately Restore Travel Ban
Actually what it is though is a carte blanche ticket for Trump to aggressively nominate übercons to the judiciary. It's a very poor judicial gambit. Also provides rationale and license to go nuclear with SCOTUS appts. I guess these judicial activists cannot help themselves, but they are poking a hornets nest.
At this point, anyone thinking Trump will take prisoners in the event Kennedy, RBG, or Breyer slots open has lost their mind.
The appeals court rejection constitutes inconceivable overreach. Libs will see it as a huge win. It isn't. The public will see it for what it is. So will Trump. Rightly so. Insofar as packing the courts with überconservatives is the likely endpoint, we all lose a little in the result.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:15 am to Choupique19
quote:Leftist judicial overreach is the difference. That's it.
What is the difference between this ban and the Obama ban
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:15 am to Tigereye10005
The blood will be on that judge's hands (along with the hands of all liberals) when the next terror attack happens. Sad, but true.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:17 am to imjustafatkid
How many fatal terrorists attacks have bee launched by refugees in the US?
0
I'm no lawyer, but how can you justify passing these sorts of "emergency" EO's to prevent actions from happening that have never occurred before?
0
I'm no lawyer, but how can you justify passing these sorts of "emergency" EO's to prevent actions from happening that have never occurred before?
This post was edited on 2/5/17 at 7:32 am
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:17 am to TJGator1215
quote:
Good.
Are you going to live in a police no go zone when they start popping up?
A God damned obvious disaster in Europe for all the world to see and you mother frickers not only do not want to stop it, you want to speed it up.
Tell us what we should do when demand for local sharia start popping up, as they ALWAYS do whenever Muslims pass a certain % of the population.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:17 am to a want
quote:Really. ???
and his Chief of Staff is the Nativist Kook behind Breitbart. ???
Do tell.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:18 am to a want
quote:
How many fatal terrorists attacks have bee launched by immigrants in the US?
WTF? They were all born here
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:19 am to olddawg26
quote:
Good this was a disaster
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:20 am to a want
quote:
How many fatal terrorists attacks have bee launched by immigrants in the US?
Irrelevant.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:20 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
"(f) Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
8 U.S. Code § 1182 has been amended significantly since its enactment.
For example, the 1965 Hart-Cellar act states: "...No person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of his race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence..."
That's just one example of many that have restricted the code you are all relying on like it's the end all be all of immigration policy. There are certainly legal issues to be sorted out here, and that's what the courts are set up for. So, instead of criticizing every court decision that doesn't go your way, everyone needs to do at least a minimal amount of research before having such a strong opinion. 1182(f) does not give unchecked power to the president to indiscriminately ban immigration. Try again.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:20 am to a want
quote:You have got to be kidding!
How many fatal terrorists attacks have bee launched by immigrants in the US?
Why don't we give you the mulligan you were unwilling to give Conway, and let you just start that rhetorical over.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:21 am to Tigereye10005
quote:
Appeals Court Rejects Request to Immediately Restore Travel Ban Appeals Court Rejects Request to Immediately Restore Travel Ban Checks and balances at work, folks
Isn't it funny that the same checks and balances didn't work under the Obama administration.
The court order ruling against Obama's immigration EO was simply ignored. 
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:21 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Really?
My bad. Chief Strategist, not Chief of Staff.
#alternatefacts
#ptsdfrombowlinggreenmassare
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:23 am to Tigereye10005
A new shill on the board
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:23 am to Tigereye10005
quote:
It's universally accepted by the legal community that the US cannot limit or ban immigration for *any* reason.
You are lying.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:23 am to Tigereye10005
quote:
How many fatal terrorists attacks have bee launched by immigrants in the US?
This Bitch came here through the visa program, immigrated here to get married. How many did she help kill, 14 and about 25 seriously injured.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:25 am to golfntiger32
quote:
How many fatal terrorists attacks have bee launched by immigrants in the US?
you've gone full retardPosted on 2/5/17 at 7:26 am to NC_Tigah
I wonder if San Bernardino crossed his mind?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 7:26 am to a want
quote:
how can you justify passing these sorts of "emergency" EO's to prevent actions from happening that have never occurred before?
It's pretty easy. We want to keep up the record. I'm assuming it may have something to do with ISIS and their stated goal of...
-killing us all or making us submit to their caliphate
-using the cover of refugees to get head chopper offers into our country.
The arguments never mention that the people have changed and the tactics have changed.
I really hope the liberal love affair with Islam doesn't lead to eventual bad things for our country. The problem is that if you are right no big deal. You just get to call me a chicken that worried about nothing. If I'm right, people will die at the hands of terrorists.
Sounds like a game of chicken with a semi-versus a tricycle to me but whatever. As long as you guys feel comfortable with either outcome...
This post was edited on 2/5/17 at 7:43 am
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News