re: Appeals court calls Trump administration's defiance over mistakenly deported man shocking.

quote:

---

No person

---

quote:

---

any person

---

What your dumb arse doesn't comprehend is that as written the constitution didn't apply to either slaves or native Americans and had to be amended to include them .

So like I said how in the frick do you think it applies to in anyone who steps on the so called magic dirt?

quote:

---

Bring this guy back, do it the right way and then send him back to El Salvador

---

This administration refuses to do legally pragmatic shite like that though.

They are correct on the issue, but just can’t stop intentionally picking fights in court, only to then turn around and complain that courts are holding everything up.

This was incredibly avoidable.

You might be right.

But I doubt the sort of illegality the District Courts have been engaged in: illegal jurisdiction claims, overstepping the separation of powers, etc. would be stopped or even slowed down had the Administration given an inch on this case.

quote:

---

the executive is defying a supreme court order then they are acting like they are above their co-equal branch in government.

---

And if they succumb to the Supreme court's insanity they aren't co equal either.

The way this works is the Supreme Court offers opinion (that word choice is not accidental) the executive either respects or rejects that opinion and executes accordingly.

The executive is then accountable through impeachment or election. This ultimately puts the judgement in the people. Same for the judges, they can be impeached.

That's our government.

For example, Mississippi ignored court opinion and the executive chose to enforce biracial school enrollment and suffer the political support or fallout from that action. Ultimately it was supported.

Where we are is two laws contradict each other, the executive has one opinion and the judicial another. The executive will decide the course and suffer the political consequences.

Perhaps our country would prefer we suffer poor rulings to keep a norm, perhaps in this case not.

We'll see.

You are arguing that oligarchy (scotus) is inherently more just than monarchy (executive). Thats wrong. It depends on the oligarchy or the monarchy. It also isn't our form of government either way.

GFY, Bunk is just that, shitty crap that nobody cares for. Damn, you are terrible at this!

quote:

---

This is a very stupid hill for them to die on

---

Regardless of what the courts are doing, this is a Trump victory.

No one gives a shite about this guy.This is a major PR win, the gift that keeps on giving.

Trump was elected on this.

There is only one group dying on hills, and it’s not the republicans.

quote:

---

I just meant do it right the first time. Obey the order and appeal it, and win. Then to CECOT he goes. The admin is great on policy. But implementation always seems impulsive and half-baked

---

It's literally just muh fight nonsense

They're addicted to the dopamine hits from the macho projection.

It's literally just muh fight nonsense

You're addicted "muh norm" nonsense around institutions that aren't worth caring about norms.

quote:

---

They're addicted to the dopamine hits from the macho projection.

---

Rather that than knowing beyond all doubt that there’s a complete omission of any semblance of “macho” in myself, and having to hide the depraved anguish it’s caused me. Since you mentioned it.