- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:53 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
And the North didn't go to war to end slavery
The North went to war to both end slavery and preserve the Union.
The South went to war to preserve the institution of chattel slavery. The South, btw, also started the war.
Sorry that your talking points are so easy to demolish, but you're not that smart so it's fitting.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:55 pm to Zach
quote:
Wrong. They knew in 1860 that the other European nations had dropped slavery. The handwriting was on the wall.
There was a strong abolitionist movement in the US as well.
It is claimed in the book "A Concise Chronicle History of the African-American People Experience in America" that the Republican Party wanted to achieve the gradual extinction of slavery by market forces, but Southern leaders blocked it. Why the South didn't listen to the abolition movement in the US is one reason why I think the slaveowners would not have listened to Britain and France in their anti-slavery movement worldwide.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:58 pm to BamaAtl
quote:If you weren't a grad of the Evelyn Woods Sped Redding Scool, you would know that I am not promoting any kind of racist agenda - in fact the exact opposite is true.
Now get out of your racist talking points and come back to reality. It'll still be here, champ.
But you obviously, with wild hair growing in your arse, want to pursue war with the 'it was about slavery' revisionists. Have at it and good luck.
It still won't impair the fundamental point I am promoting: construing what Kelly said as some veiled, overt, or otherwise communicated promotion of racism or slavery is patently absurd.
You want to be pals, fine. You don't, GFY.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 3:53 pm to bamarep
General Kelly is definitely /ourguy/.
I can't wait to see GOP cucks turn on him the more based he gets.
I can't wait to see GOP cucks turn on him the more based he gets.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:13 pm to Homesick Tiger
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:15 pm to bamarep
Kelly was wrong. We saw him as the great white hope for a while.
Kelly = Great White Nope
Kelly = Great White Nope
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:16 pm to bamarep
What Kelly said was 100% correct.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:38 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
The North went to war to both end slavery and preserve the Union.
Then why didn't the North end slavery in the North before the Civil War? Why did it take so long to end slavery after the War?
You constantly preach from your high horse after being proven wrong time after time.
Typical liberal douche.
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 10/31/17 at 5:16 pm to Loserman
quote:
Arab, Alabama is 97% white 2% Hispanic 1% Asian
Like Mexicans respond to a Census.
My family is from that area bruh...
Posted on 10/31/17 at 5:17 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
and was proven wrong
Posted on 10/31/17 at 5:24 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
The North went to war to both end slavery and preserve the Union.
As usual you are as full of shite as a Christmas turkey. Maybe you should read Lincoln’s first inaugural address.
“Apprehension seems to exist among the people of the Southern States, that by the accession of a Republican Administration, their property, and their peace, and personal security, are to be endangered. There has never been any reasonable cause for such apprehension. Indeed, the most ample evidence to the contrary has all the while existed, and been open to their inspection. It is found in nearly all the published speeches of him who now addresses you. I do but quote from one of those speeches when I declare that "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so." Those who nominated and elected me did so with full knowledge that I had made this, and many similar declarations, and had never recanted them. And more than this, they placed in the platform, for my acceptance, and as a law to themselves, and to me, the clear and emphatic resolution which I now read:
Resolved, That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States, and especially the right of each State to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is essential to that balance of power on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depend; and we denounce the lawless invasion by armed force of the soil of any State or Territory, no matter what pretext, as among the gravest of crimes."
Posted on 10/31/17 at 6:13 pm to bamarep
He is racist because of the racist he supports. That goes for many of you too.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 7:03 pm to bamarep
Kelly is 100% correct in his statements
As a military man he actually understands the details and nuances of American war history unlike the Un American prog filth
As a military man he actually understands the details and nuances of American war history unlike the Un American prog filth
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News