- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anyone else feel really bad for Blasley-Ford?
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:22 am to jacob4bama
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:22 am to jacob4bama
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 2:55 am
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:22 am to CAD703X
I don’t feel anything for her. She’s either a horrible person or a tragic victim that’s about to see her assaulter become a Supreme Court Justice.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:22 am to CAD703X
Lol a pawn that's getting paid. Isn't that the new liberal way
And to answer frick NO
And to answer frick NO
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:22 am to CAD703X
They will get her a very nice hovercraft so she will no longer have to fly to her Tahiti and Hawaii vacations...
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:22 am to CAD703X
If she genuinely believes it happened or it did happen, I feel sorry for her.
I do think regardless she was manipulated by people who did not have her wishes or best interest at heart.
I do think regardless she was manipulated by people who did not have her wishes or best interest at heart.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:23 am to CAD703X
quote:
Nah. She got paid.
Most likely I think.
I came to the conclusion that the leak was a false flag to show her has a reluctant witness therefore more credible.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:24 am to CAD703X
I do. From all accounts she is a mentally disturbed individual who suffered a life of abuse and was taken advantage of by a group of Democratic senators and lawyers for political gain.
Her testimony was eye opening and I don't think she had a full grasp of her situation until yesterday.
Feinstein sat on her allegations for months despite having multiple opportunities to bring them up timely and confidentially.
Either her house rep or Feinstein betrayed her trust and published the letter to the press against her wishes and without her consent.
Her lawyers lied to her about the committees offers to do the hearing and investigation in her home city so she wouldn't have to travel.
She didn't even know who was paying for her lawyers or her expenses, I assume because her lawyers never once discussed their fees or client agreements.
She thought there was no investigation, but was visibly disturbed to find out that not only did Leland give a statement, but PJ did as well. We hadn't even named him yet and they already had his statement.
Her lawyers set up and paid for a polygraph test with a stranger and without them present on the day of her grandma's funeral in an airport hotel conference room before her flight home.
Her testimony was eye opening and I don't think she had a full grasp of her situation until yesterday.
Feinstein sat on her allegations for months despite having multiple opportunities to bring them up timely and confidentially.
Either her house rep or Feinstein betrayed her trust and published the letter to the press against her wishes and without her consent.
Her lawyers lied to her about the committees offers to do the hearing and investigation in her home city so she wouldn't have to travel.
She didn't even know who was paying for her lawyers or her expenses, I assume because her lawyers never once discussed their fees or client agreements.
She thought there was no investigation, but was visibly disturbed to find out that not only did Leland give a statement, but PJ did as well. We hadn't even named him yet and they already had his statement.
Her lawyers set up and paid for a polygraph test with a stranger and without them present on the day of her grandma's funeral in an airport hotel conference room before her flight home.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:24 am to CAD703X
Yes. I think she was taken advantage of and used as a political pawn.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:25 am to GnashRebel
Lol this is a grown arse woman with a PHD she knew what she was doing.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:25 am to CAD703X
I will never feel sorry for someone who lied through her teeth under oath to slander and ruin an innocent man for personal and political gain.
frick her.
frick her.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:26 am to CAD703X
Not one bit. I didn’t feel the emotion from her.
This post was edited on 9/28/18 at 10:43 am
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:26 am to Sentrius
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 2:55 am
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:26 am to CAD703X
No more than I feel sorry for a mosquito I swat off of my arm
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:27 am to CAD703X
Not really. I think she has a grudge against the Kavanaugh family. I think her plan was to prevent Kav ever getting nominated in the first place. I dont think she ever intended to go public. The GOP senators knew this hence the hammering to DiFi for throwing this lady out to the wolves.
Dont lie about people to settle a family grudge and things like this wont happen
Dont lie about people to settle a family grudge and things like this wont happen
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:28 am to CAD703X
She lied about flying! Credibility = ZERO
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:29 am to CAD703X
Absolutely not.
She chose to write a letter setting forth an accusation against USSC nominee for the SOLE purpose of trying to prevent him from becoming a justice. Otherwise, why write letter?
It's likely this exploded well beyond what she ever imagined. But if you're going to make an accusation against someone, one that you felt was serious enough to warrant investigation and/or the potential disqualification of a Supreme Court justice nominee, then you damn well better be prepared to defend it.
Whether what she says happened or not, you don't accuse someone of egregious behavior without being prepared to back up your accusation. She didn't have to interject herself in this situation, but she chose to do so.
She chose to write a letter setting forth an accusation against USSC nominee for the SOLE purpose of trying to prevent him from becoming a justice. Otherwise, why write letter?
It's likely this exploded well beyond what she ever imagined. But if you're going to make an accusation against someone, one that you felt was serious enough to warrant investigation and/or the potential disqualification of a Supreme Court justice nominee, then you damn well better be prepared to defend it.
Whether what she says happened or not, you don't accuse someone of egregious behavior without being prepared to back up your accusation. She didn't have to interject herself in this situation, but she chose to do so.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:29 am to CAD703X
She got paid for lying. It was an act.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 9:29 am to YumYum Sauce
Let’s see what her demeanor is when she appears on the view and other liberal cable news shows I bet she won’t be quite as sweet, fragile and naive as acted in the hearing
Popular
Back to top


0








