- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Another thread on the "Epstein Files".
Posted on 11/16/25 at 6:07 am
Posted on 11/16/25 at 6:07 am
We know that Epstein was communicating w/ Stacey Plaskett during a frigging hearing w/ Michael Cohen.
We also know that Epstein wanted the law to crush Trump.
So, knowing that Epstein was in cahoots w/ Democrats and could communicate w/ them anytime he pleased and we know that he hated Trump, why wouldn't he hand over truly damning evidence against Trump through some back door if he had the goods?
I may be missing something here, so go nuts telling me what I overlooked.
We also know that Epstein wanted the law to crush Trump.
So, knowing that Epstein was in cahoots w/ Democrats and could communicate w/ them anytime he pleased and we know that he hated Trump, why wouldn't he hand over truly damning evidence against Trump through some back door if he had the goods?
I may be missing something here, so go nuts telling me what I overlooked.
7
Posted on 11/16/25 at 6:09 am to stuntman
All signs point to Dems being guilty of literally everything they accuse Trump of doing.
Time & time again.
Time & time again.
Posted on 11/16/25 at 6:56 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Then let the people see it 
Posted on 11/16/25 at 7:08 am to rmnldr
It’s become the UAP files all over again.
Everyone knows they have something, the government swears they will tell us, but then they never do. Instead, they give conflicting stories. Nothing was ever there, or it’s on somebody’s desk… Which is it?
Everyone knows they have something, the government swears they will tell us, but then they never do. Instead, they give conflicting stories. Nothing was ever there, or it’s on somebody’s desk… Which is it?
Posted on 11/16/25 at 7:13 am to stuntman
quote:
I may be missing something here, so go nuts telling me what I overlooked.
Posted on 11/16/25 at 7:14 am to stuntman
Russia gate 2.0
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:06 am to Madking
The MSM gone full bore on this Epstein.
Marching orders have been sent out. Full court press.
Marching orders have been sent out. Full court press.
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:08 am to Stat M Repairman
Muh Russians part deux.
Retards gobble it up.
Retards gobble it up.
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:21 am to stuntman
The Epstein files are a concern because they expose how a convicted sex trafficker maintained ties with powerful figures, raising questions about accountability, transparency, and whether justice was obstructed by influence.
Article on "The List".
Well, here's what we know so far. More than 100 names have appeared in the Epstein files, including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Larry Summers among many others. These names surfaced in court documents and email exchanges released by Congress and the media.
I think it's important to remember that inclusion in these records does not constitute any evidence of criminal conduct based upon what is known so far.
We don't know if Trump is in the Epstein files and that the Republicans are trying to protect him or not. He doesn't give a reason for why the files shouldn't be released. We don't know if he's guilty or innocent of the accusations, but he's showing a defensiveness and acting like a guilty person by not taking the issue head on and supporting their releasing.
Seems like nobody remembers the last presidential campaign. When Trump promised to release the files if elected. Originally, the overarching objective was to promote transparency and accountability, ensuring that survivors' perspectives remain a primary focus as Congress and the public review these materials.
That should remain the objective.
Article on "The List".
Well, here's what we know so far. More than 100 names have appeared in the Epstein files, including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Larry Summers among many others. These names surfaced in court documents and email exchanges released by Congress and the media.
I think it's important to remember that inclusion in these records does not constitute any evidence of criminal conduct based upon what is known so far.
We don't know if Trump is in the Epstein files and that the Republicans are trying to protect him or not. He doesn't give a reason for why the files shouldn't be released. We don't know if he's guilty or innocent of the accusations, but he's showing a defensiveness and acting like a guilty person by not taking the issue head on and supporting their releasing.
Seems like nobody remembers the last presidential campaign. When Trump promised to release the files if elected. Originally, the overarching objective was to promote transparency and accountability, ensuring that survivors' perspectives remain a primary focus as Congress and the public review these materials.
That should remain the objective.
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:23 am to Jbird
Nobody gave a frick about Epstein until/unless Trump was a threat.
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:26 am to Nole Man
quote:
He doesn't give a reason for why the files shouldn't be released. We don't know if he's guilty or innocent of the accusations, but he's showing a defensiveness and acting like a guilty person by not taking the issue head on and supporting their releasing. Seems like nobody remembers the last presidential campaign. When Trump promised to release the files if elected.
Most of this is completely false. He isn’t being defensive and recently stated he doesn’t care if congress releases everything as long as innocent names are redacted. He never campaigned on it, was asked about it in an interview and stated yes but you have to be careful as there are innocent people in the files. He never came out during the campaign saying release everything
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:39 am to stuntman
Apparently Epstein thought it was Trump who dropped a dime on him and got him arrested in the first place, so he continually badmouthed Trump in his emails. He insinuated in some of these e mails, that Trump s**ked Bill Clintons d*ck, because he contributed so much money to his presidential campaigns. Trump doesn't want those insinuations, no matter how absurd, to get released knowing what the press will do with them.
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:45 am to Stat M Repairman
Weird isn't it?
Similar to the jerkoffs that claim they didn't vote for Biden, they claim to have always cared and talked about Muh Epstein.
Similar to the jerkoffs that claim they didn't vote for Biden, they claim to have always cared and talked about Muh Epstein.
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:50 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
All signs point to Dems being guilty of literally everything they accuse Trump of doing. Time & time again.
Yep
So release everything
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:50 am to SlidellCajun
quote:
So release everything
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:53 am to Jbird
Why you roll on the floor laughing?
You don’t want the info?
You don’t want the info?
Posted on 11/16/25 at 9:55 am to SlidellCajun
quote:
You don’t want the info?
One more time, they could release everything including bar bnapkins and waterheaded yowler monkeys will claim they didn't release everything! Which is why
quote:cracks me up.
Just release everything
Posted on 11/16/25 at 10:05 am to Jbird
But YOU want them to release whatever they have with the intent to release all info right?
And is it really that funny?
And is it really that funny?
This post was edited on 11/16/25 at 10:06 am
Posted on 11/16/25 at 10:10 am to SlidellCajun
quote:Yes I do, which has nothing to do with laughing at the quote babbled a million times.
But YOU want them to release whatever they have with the intent to release all info right?
quote:Yes,yes it is.
And is it really that funny?
Without a doubt everything released and half the idiots on TD will claim it wasn't all released.
We have fricking clowns that think nothing has been released.
Posted on 11/16/25 at 10:19 am to stuntman
Could be the simplest reason they haven't been released yet ...
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News