- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anna Paulina switches vote to "NO"
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
I agree. But I'm glad she changed her stance.
0
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
So all choices based on perceived political expediency are now deemed "principled" in your mind?
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
Her opinion ‘evolved’
Don’t you Leftiods love that term when rethinking a position?
Don’t you Leftiods love that term when rethinking a position?
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:08 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Is that what she ran on? Her campaign platform was MOAR continuing resolutions?
She literally just said this a few hours ago
She threw out whatever her campaign said about CRs with that post.
And, to make it worse, she flip flopped a couple hours later.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:10 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
So all choices based on perceived political expediency are now deemed "principled" in your mind?
We don't need to guess.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And, to make it worse, she flip flopped a couple hours later.
Again... did she flip flop? Or did she come out one way, thinking she was doing best for her district, and then the people in the district said "Hey... don't do this garbage on our behalf", so she listened to them (novel concept for Washington) and changed her vote?
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
spineless
or responding to her constituents but you do not know which because your default is always pro-leftist
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
Your "receipts" aren't painting the picture you think they are there, sport.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
That reads to me like she was heavily conflicted about going against her convictions to support this bull shite.
It's weird to see you so up in arms about this, given what you purport to be your philosophy.
It's weird to see you so up in arms about this, given what you purport to be your philosophy.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:11 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
did she flip flop?
You can't spin this. It is a completely 180.
quote:
Or did she come out one way, thinking she was doing best for her district, and then the people in the district said "Hey... don't do this garbage on our behalf"
There is no way, with how communications go with people in Congress, she could have ingested the responses from many of her constituents in 2 hours or so.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:12 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
because your default is always pro-leftist
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:13 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
It's weird to see you so up in arms about this,
I'm not "up in arms".
I'm laughing at more spineless MAGA-tards with no principles.
I will always laugh at them looking like idiot grifters who change positions as the wind changes.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:13 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
It's weird to see you so up in arms about this, given you purport to be your philosophy.
Eh... he just sees an opportunity to, at least in his mind, stick it to a MAGA republican. Nothing more. Were this a democrat doing this... you wouldn't even hear so much as a peep out of him
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm laughing at more spineless MAGA-tards with no principles.
I will always laugh at them looking like idiot grifters who change positions as the wind changes.
This is just dumb.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is no way, with how communications go with people in Congress, she could have ingested the responses from many of her constituents in 2 hours or so.
It only takes the right donor. Don't be naïve.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:14 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
Were this a democrat doing this... you wouldn't even hear so much as a peep out of him
Because I expect dishonesty from Democrats. That's why I'm not a Democrat.
Why would I support that behavior with someone like APL?
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:14 pm to loogaroo
quote:
It only takes the right donor. Don't be naïve.
That's a COMPLETELY different arguments with its own problems
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's why I'm not a Democrat.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:16 pm to lake chuck fan
Good for her. The CR is bullshite and tying all that crap to fema funding is quintessential swamp garbage.
Page 2 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News