Started By
Message
locked post

Andrew Yang on Google, Amazon helping pay for his $1,000-per-month UBI plan

Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:20 am
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:20 am
quote:

"I'm happy to say that I have hundreds of techies who support me on this. They're not all a--holes," Yang said.

Yang said some of these supporters are people who work for big companies such as Google and Amazon. In fact, the Yang campaign has a list of technology leaders it says have pledged $1,000 or more to the campaign it calls the Tech 1,000. Yang's campaign says the list includes Twitter and Square founder Jack Dorsey, Open AI CEO Sam Altman, Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh and Google product management director Scott Johnston.


quote:

"Amazon is the most prominent example. Amazon is [a $1 trillion] company that literally paid zero in taxes last year, and that's not unusual. They routinely pay zero or near zero in taxes," Yang told the Times. Amazon, which currently has just over a $900 billion market cap, paid $0 in U.S. federal income tax on more than $11 billion in profits before taxes in 2018 and received a $129 million tax rebate from the federal government.

"Companies like Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, and Google are the clear winners in this economy right now and yet they aren't paying much in taxes, so a VAT would hit them harder and force them to pay their fair share," Yang campaign spokesperson Madalin Sammons tells CNBC Make It.


LINK

Let the hand wringing begin. These mega-tech corporations pay nothing to at most pennies in taxes. We can easily institute a VAT and fund UBI.
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5715 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:23 am to
Why don’t those companies just make direct payments to whoever they want?
Posted by Zanzibaw
BR
Member since Jun 2016
2947 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:24 am to
He's so full of shite. Why would these companies support this?
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:25 am to
quote:

Let the hand wringing begin. These mega-tech corporations pay nothing to at most pennies in taxes.


In income taxes. They pay plenty of taxes.

quote:

We can easily institute a VAT and fund UBI.


Consumption taxes are better than income taxes, and we should institute VAT taxes because other countries already do and it fricks us on trade.

As far as it easily funding UBI, no. I still appreciate Yang’s ambition and rooting for the Democrat Party to embrace people like him.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79209 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:26 am to
quote:

so a VAT would hit them harder and force them to pay their fair share," Yang campaign spokesperson Madalin Sammons tells CNBC Make It.


Wrong.

A VAT is a pass the buck tax where every section in the supply chain is paying it, not a mere single entity. They raise their pricing to cover the VAT and it’s still a zero sum game for FedGov
Posted by NikolaiJakov
Moscow
Member since Mar 2014
2803 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:27 am to
I'll never support a VAT until the 16th amendment is repealed.

After that, VAT away

Full disclosure : I'm 100% for the FairTax
This post was edited on 8/20/19 at 7:28 am
Posted by steadytiger
Member since Jan 2007
2756 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:28 am to
Buying elections, all around.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:30 am to
quote:

We can easily institute a VAT and fund UBI.



So the govt takes money into one pocket and passes it out of the other.

Brilliant!
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27158 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:33 am to
Still amazes me that so many people do not understand taxes in general or the fact that there are so many more taxes than "income tax"...

Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89552 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:35 am to
quote:

We can easily institute a VAT


On top of sales tax, property tax, excise tax, luxury tax, income tax, etc., now you want to add a VAT on top of it?

You know that the economy is resistant to taxation of much more than 19 to 21 percent.

My biggest problem with a VAT tax is what is it for? It's a "just because" tax.
Posted by steadytiger
Member since Jan 2007
2756 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:37 am to
quote:

Andrew Yang on Google, Amazon helping pay for his $1,000-per-month UBI plan


Good, let the commie bastards send their money down another rabbit hole. It is good for Trump's economy!
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
14923 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:38 am to
Lol a yang Wang supporter is actually worse than a fricking Bernie bro.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10436 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:39 am to
Here’s the thing:
We already have state sales taxes. Oh... and most states have an income tax too. Many also have property taxes too. And hotel and car rental and event taxes... And an income tax by the feds. We are hit on so many levels, it’s insane and totally unfair.

But Trade off a federal income tax for a federal sales tax and I’m down.

Here’s what’ll happen though. Just like in Europe, we’ll get a sales tax and we’ll keep the income tax.

Vat taxes are sneaky though. I’d rather an add on sales tax done at the register.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
14923 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:40 am to
It is embarrassing that the op managed to graduate from LSU. We can only hope it was in liberal arts since he doesn’t understand anything business related.
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:51 am to
quote:

It is embarrassing that the op managed to graduate from LSU. We can only hope it was in liberal arts since he doesn’t understand anything business related.


Learned everything I know from KSaul
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67490 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:51 am to
I have a better chance I being elected POTUS than Yang does and I don't support the "free shite" ticket
Posted by pwejr88
Red Stick
Member since Apr 2007
36187 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:51 am to
Just to clarify, Yang is saying he’ll give every citizen $1,000 a month?

If that’s the case, he’s got my vote locked up
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14499 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 7:55 am to
Or institute a VAT on internet commerce and use it to pay for the entitlements that already exist that we currently can’t afford. That is, reduce the deficit before starting any new entitlements.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
21630 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 8:00 am to
If the high tech companies want to do this then why don't they just do it. Do they need a law for this?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89552 posts
Posted on 8/20/19 at 8:13 am to
quote:

If that’s the case, he’s got my vote locked up


Classic - burn the whole building down to get your share of the ashes.



Can none of you UBI motherfrickers do math? Give or take 250 million adults - $1k per month, that's $250 billion - PER MONTH. $3 TRILLION per year.

There is no amount of savings from SNAP or Section 8 or social security (which will all remain intact, regardless of UBI, even if there are reductions or offsets) is going to make $3 T pop in out of thin air.

So, we'll have to print it. Which will make your $1000 a month worth about tree fiddy.
This post was edited on 8/20/19 at 8:14 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram