- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann wakes up to the reality of Florida justice
Posted on 11/9/25 at 10:58 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 11/9/25 at 10:58 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Imagine getting worked up on a Sunday because slimeball Andrew Weissmann might finally face justice. 
2
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:01 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
... seems weird that he is complaining about "behavior of the judge " , "procedural behavior"?
Why not, "U R Barking up the wrong tree", sort of thing?
I think something else is going on
A different scope perhaps , that's why he looks really scared.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:02 am to SlowFlowPro
Yeah, who could predict that you would ask people on the internet to explain in detail what is reserved for a court of law to sus out? Like, anyone and everyone who reads your retarded posts day after day. But yes, these subpoenas will be used to determine potential prosecutorial misconduct on things we were shouting for the rafters that looked like prosecutorial misconduct AT THE TIME from a guy with a well known history of prosecutorial misconduct.
Again, the lengths you go to to try to win internet points is simply absurd. Meanwhile, these things we told you years ago would happen continue to come to pass and you have to change your stances from, "no chance that is happening" to, "well yeah, it looks like it may have happened, but now you need to prove it, courts and due process be damned, prove it right here on an Internet discussion board".
You seriously behave like a 12 year old.
Again, the lengths you go to to try to win internet points is simply absurd. Meanwhile, these things we told you years ago would happen continue to come to pass and you have to change your stances from, "no chance that is happening" to, "well yeah, it looks like it may have happened, but now you need to prove it, courts and due process be damned, prove it right here on an Internet discussion board".
You seriously behave like a 12 year old.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:02 am to KiwiHead
quote:
frickin hate Weissman and all things in the Mueller probe
This is a lie.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:03 am to KCT
quote:
Imagine getting worked up on a Sunday
Why pick on AlterEd?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:05 am to AlterEd
quote:
Yeah, who could predict that you would ask people on the internet to explain in detail what is reserved for a court of law to sus out?
You are the one speaking so confidently about this and then retreating when asked to show your work.
quote:
potential prosecutorial misconduct on things we were shouting for the rafters that looked like prosecutorial misconduct AT THE TIME
What, specifically?
You can't hid behind the "prosecutors will figure it out" stuff here, as you specifically included your own perceptions/arguments from the time.
quote:
Meanwhile, these things we told you years ago would happen continue to come to pass
Again here you conflate generalities and specifics.
quote:
but now you need to prove it, courts and due process be damned, prove it right here on an Internet discussion board
Says the guy who spoke with such confidence (without any justification) a sentence earlier
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:07 am to VOR
quote:
Judge Cannonis the most obviously corrupt federal judge I’ve ever seen in action,
Imagine the cojones it takes to type these words in a world where Jeb Boasberg draws breath from the federal bench.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:09 am to SlowFlowPro
And to clear up some of your earlier retardation about an investigation and it's actions being legally appointed... What doesn't follow, is the idea that an investigation can be legally appointed, but it's actions not be. That's what is meant by "this doesn't necessarily follow", but you know that as well. You're just continuing to be retarded.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:14 am to SlowFlowPro
He has been subpoenaed by a federal grand jury. The statute of limitations has expired, thus he can’t take the 5th on anything that occurred more than 5 years ago. He can’t lie either. Quite the pickle isn’t it ? Truthfully respond and lay out all of the BS with Crossfire and the lawfare tactics, or lie to the grand jury create a new felony. We both know that when you were subpoenaed to testify before federal grand jury, then you will only be asked questions of things with the answers are already known and can be proven. He is screwed one way or the other.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:14 am to AlterEd
quote:
And to clear up some of your earlier retardation about an investigation and it's actions being legally appointed... What doesn't follow, is the idea that an investigation can be legally appointed, but it's actions not be.
Oh gee, let's look at what I asked you
quote:
What was illegal about the formation and actions of the Mueller investigation?
And what I said previously
quote:
Legally-formed SC that did legal actions.
You did not answer the bolded portion, either.
This post was edited on 11/9/25 at 11:16 am
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:17 am to michael corleone
quote:
The statute of limitations has expired, thus he can’t take the 5th on anything
Well people are alleging it hasn't, so he still can. Quite the pickle for the admin.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:18 am to the808bass
You can go back and check on my posts about Mueller and all things Russia. I was very critical of it and thought it ALL bullshite.
But you can't hold Weissman liable for his actions in the probe especially since he was part of the Specicial Counsel's investigation that was initiated by Trump and his Deputy AG.....or are you going to rewrite history?
But you can't hold Weissman liable for his actions in the probe especially since he was part of the Specicial Counsel's investigation that was initiated by Trump and his Deputy AG.....or are you going to rewrite history?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:21 am to AlterEd
You really don't know what you are talking about. Spell it out .
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:26 am to KCT
In this instance how? If you are talking Mueller, he is protected via statute. The office investigated and ultimately the findings showed no collusion . No prosecutions other than a few Russians in absentia for bullshite activities....and Manafort for Tax Evasion
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:49 am to KiwiHead
quote:
You really don't know what you are talking about. Spell it out .
I'm not the one lying on the internet. And I have spelled it out. I'm sorry you can't read.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:51 am to AlterEd
quote:
And I have spelled it out.
You did not. You said
quote:
these subpoenas will be used to determine potential prosecutorial misconduct
Instead of spelling it out.
And then you displayed you're not good at reading English
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:54 am to SlowFlowPro
What is so hard to understand about that statement?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:55 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
"You have a real dichotomy in the way you're supposed to behave and ..."
Tell it to the 28,000 Arthur Andersen employees you screwed, you audacious f*ck.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:55 am to AlterEd
Nothing. That's why I can clearly see that you provided no details as usual when asked to do so
Posted on 11/9/25 at 11:56 am to NC_Tigah
The dude was caught out shredding exculpatory evidence and has had numerous convictions overturned. How he hasn't been disbarred is hard to understand unless our government just seems to like having attorneys around with no ethical value whatsoever.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News