Started By
Message

re: Andrew Kolvet just called Joe Kent out on his lies about asking questions on Charlie Kirk

Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:50 pm to
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
44945 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

What happened to Joe Kent?? Thought he was one of the good guy.


Pussy is undefeated.
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
1990 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:50 pm to
[
quote:

What questions?
quote]Andrew said that is absolutely false and he is privy to information that he is not allowed to discuss.[/quote]

the ones he was obviously not privy to. Which seems to be a real issue for Kent. He seems to believe his 11 tours entitles him to whatever information he wants regardless of where he finds himself on the information chain totem pole
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 1:51 pm
Posted by Marshhen
Port Eads
Member since Nov 2018
1044 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

What questions?


He was asking Candace Owens type questions and was told to get lost. Newsflash… Decorated veterans can also become whack jobs.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11319 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Andrew called him out for being a scumbag and using Charlie to get clicks.


Posted by Marshhen
Port Eads
Member since Nov 2018
1044 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

What questions?


He was asking Candace Owens type questions and was told to get lost. Newsflash… Decorated veterans can also become whack jobs.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128846 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:53 pm to
He didn’t want questions answered. He wanted to use the power of his position to open an investigation that he would then leak the existence of the investigation to legitimize the questions.

This is the same playbook they used against Trump in Russia gate.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 1:54 pm
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
1990 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:53 pm to
"He was not allowed."


what made him entitled to look into them "more"
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 1:58 pm
Posted by tigerlion
Member since Jul 2009
2322 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Umm watch the video: Starts at 1:50:10


Thanks, and I watched it. First, Kent didn’t quit, as they just said, because “he couldn’t ask questions.” That wasn’t the reason for his resignation.

In the Tucker/Kent interview, the topic of Kirk’s assassination came up after over an hour into the interview as Kent was frustrated with BOTH the Butler attempt investigation as well as the Kirk assassination investigation. Furthermore, Kent never once said definitively that Tyler Robinson didn’t do this.

I trust neither the FBI nor the DOJ. I guess we are disagreeing on our personal levels of trust in these institutions.
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
1990 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

He didn’t want questions answered. He wanted to use the power of his position to open an investigation that he would then leak the existence of the investigation to legitimize the questions.


I suspect you're correct. Even if you're not, these keyboard warriors for Kent really need to start to answer why they believe their new and (trust me) quite temporary hero was "entitled" to the information he sought.

We have a chain of government for a reason. If Joe Kent was important enough to be privy to the information then he would have hadi it.

If anybody in the chain that was making a decision about the imminent threat Iran posed gave a rat's arse about what Joe Kent thougth about it they would have pulled Joe Kent into the frickin meeting where real decisions were being made.

There's a reason why he and about 1.5 million other government employees weren't part of either of these processes.

This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 1:59 pm
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19357 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:01 pm to
Does that make it okay to give information to enemies ?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128846 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Furthermore, Kent never once said definitively that Tyler Robinson didn’t do this.


In interview, former government official does not definitively claim that 2+2 does not equal four.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11319 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

He didn’t want questions answered. He wanted to use the power of his position to open an investigation that he would then leak the existence of the investigation to legitimize the questions.


Where is your evidence for this?

Be specific.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128846 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:05 pm to
My evidence is that as soon as he exited government he scheduled three interviews to tell us this.

When he completes it, you can come back and tell me I was right.
Posted by Laugh More
Member since Jan 2022
3952 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

There’s no good guys involved in politics right now.

quote:

right now.

Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11319 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:06 pm to
Sounds like you're just running your cock holster.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128846 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:08 pm to


But when I do, I don’t sound retarded. It ain’t easy, bro. But you should definitely aspire to it.
Posted by tigerlion
Member since Jul 2009
2322 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

In interview, former government official does not definitively claim that 2+2 does not equal four.


He did not. Solid counter argument. They would have loved having you on the Warren Commission leaning more towards trusting our intel agencies than being skeptical of them.
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
1990 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:10 pm to


Have you decided why both you and Kent are entitled to information neither you nor Kent is entitled to yet?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128846 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:11 pm to
I’m very skeptical of our intelligence agencies. Give me an evidence-based reason to be skeptical of them wrt Charlie Kirk.

I’ll repeat this as often as necessary.
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
2359 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:11 pm to
Yes everyone knows that real men of integrity immediately go on a speaking tour immediately after resigning lol you fools fall for it every single time
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram