Started By
Message

And the award for the single worst SCOTUS justice EVER goes to:

Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:48 am
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:48 am
Ketanji Brown Jackson...let's see her resume thus far:

1st up
quote:

It’s now well known that Jackson repeated an embarrassing falsehood while defending affirmative action in college admissions. In her Students for Fair Admissions dissent, she asserted that matching Black physicians with Black patients doubles survival rates for newborns, a claim that’s equally unbelievable and factually unsupported.


Now
quote:

But this is not the only mistake Jackson made. Her second error shows the diversity-industrial complex’s deep corruption of medicine – and its threat to Americans’ health. Jackson wrote, "research shows that Black physicians are more likely to accurately assess Black patients’ pain tolerance and treat them accordingly," for instance, "prescribing them appropriate amounts of pain medication." A footnote refers to an amicus brief from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), the same source that led to Jackson’s first mistake.

The AAMC brief refers to four studies in support of this claim.

Yet none of them examine whether Black doctors are better at treating the pain of Black patients. All four document Black patients’ problems with pain management, but crucially, not one examines the efficacy of doctors of different races. The AAMC either failed to read the research or deliberately created this claim out of whole cloth.

Let's all congratulate the new leader of the lil' yellow bus wing of the SCOTUS

Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
18756 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:50 am to
I mean, she can't define what a woman is. The bar was set pretty low from the start.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26720 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:50 am to
She's doing the job she was hired to do, to the detriment of us all.
Posted by tggauthor
Member since Apr 2023
3 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:50 am to
The fact that—I don't remember the exact wording now—she essentially said that she didn't know what natural rights were (or didn't believe in them) during senate confirmation hearings should have been an automatic disqualification from the seat.
Posted by ynlvr
Rocket City
Member since Feb 2009
4583 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:53 am to
This is no surprise to anyone who watched her train wreck of an approval process in the Senate. Dumb as a box of rocks. So, now we have her and the "wise Latina" dragging the Supreme Court into the gutter. A heavy weight.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
29260 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:55 am to
It’s affirmative Action in action

And that’s what you get because of it
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:00 am to
quote:

And the award for the single worst SCOTUS justice EVER goes to: Ketanji Brown Jackson
She is pretty weak intellectually, but get back to me when she writes a "Plessy v Ferguson" or a "Dred Scott v Sandford." THEN she will be in the running for a SERIOUS "worst ever" list.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 11:01 am
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11020 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:04 am to
You can add AAMC to the AMA as organizations that work against us in healthcare.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95198 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:05 am to
The Wise Latina says “hold my sangria.”
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95198 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:06 am to
Dred or Plessy requires her to be writing a majority opinion. I don’t see that happening outside a 9-0 anytime soon.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59747 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I don’t see that happening outside a 9-0 anytime soon.

If there's a 9-0 SCOTUS vote any time soon, I'll be shocked.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95198 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:10 am to
There is an outside chance of one but I see a lot more 7-2 majorities with Brown and Sotomayor on the outside looking in.


Kagan’s a lefty but she knows the law well enough not to make a completely stupid unsupportable decision. She’ll at least find a way to make it sound logical.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105403 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:15 am to
This is basically telling us that the majority of her opinions will be based on feelings, and she will contort laws and precedent to support her approval or dissent. Even if it is factually false.

I can understand some bias as long as the rule of law can support it, but to twist it to meet your social views is a disaster.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Kagan’s a lefty but she knows the law well enough not to make a completely stupid unsupportable decision. She’ll at least find a way to make it sound logical.
Kagan is bright. Very bright.

She isn't an Originalist or a Textualist, so she will often see things differently than the current SCOTUS majority. On a different court, should would probably be the one writing the important majority decisions. As is, she writes a large percentage of the coherent dissents.
Posted by ShinerHorns
El Paso
Member since Jul 2021
3904 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:16 am to
women shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the SCOTUS.
Posted by LSU7096
Houston
Member since May 2004
2490 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:19 am to
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION hires make all minority candidates look bad. I am sure there are competent minority lawyers, but the competent ones (Thomas, Marshall) are not woke enough.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112438 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:21 am to
quote:

It’s affirmative Action in action


Couldn't they find a black judge with an IQ over 90?
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
8857 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Kagan is bright. Very bright.

She isn't an Originalist or a Textualist, so she will often see things differently than the current SCOTUS majority. On a different court, should would probably be the one writing the important majority decisions. As is, she writes a large percentage of the coherent dissents.


She's not there to be any of this, she's there to UP HOLD the constitution.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29142 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:26 am to
quote:

If there's a 9-0 SCOTUS vote any time soon, I'll be shocked.


Most of them actually are.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11020 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:27 am to
Another note - all of Biden's judicial choices are disasters. Every one of them.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram