- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ancient Stone Carvings-Comet(s) Hitting Earth app.10,950 BC (p14, Shermer concedes...)
Posted on 4/28/17 at 9:40 pm to mulletproof
Posted on 4/28/17 at 9:40 pm to mulletproof
quote:
the great war star
quote:
Due to precession, Sirius, the brightest star in the sky became visible above the horizon around 11 or 12,000 years ago. Could this be the war star? Which precessional phase are we talking about? (26,000 year intervals).
Maybe but why would Sirius be called "the great war star"?
Wouldn't Sirius just be the brightest star in the sky?
quote:
Zulu legends hold that they were worked by "artificially produced flesh and blood slaves created by the First People." These slaves, the Zulu legends recount, "went into battle with the Ape-Man" when "the great war star appeared in the sky" (see Indaba My Children, by the Zulu medicine man Credo Vusamazulu Mutwa). [Genesis Revisited]
Since the Zulu legend was that the gold mines were first mined by "artificially produced flesh and blood slaves created by the First People" and those slaves "went into battle with the Ape-Man" when "the great war star appeared in the sky", what if those "First People" came to Earth in spaceships.
Those spaceships would look like "stars" when they were high in the sky.
When one of the spaceships came to Earth to help the "slaves" fight the war with the "Ape-Man" then as the spaceship appeared in the sky it would be called it "the great war star".
I'm not saying any of this is true.
I'm just postulating that it could be true.
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 9:44 pm
0
Posted on 4/28/17 at 10:29 pm to Arksulli
quote:
God, just think of what early humans faced in Australia? Forty foot long super Komodo dragons, ten foot tall carnivorous kangaroos, and super sized salt water crocodiles.
Which is from where, I think, perhaps some of the dragon myths may have sprouted.
Every myth is based in fact, every legend based in some event transpiring in the past or some species or creature that interacted with our ancestors or some skull and bone stumbled-upon in ancient times.
As much as people debate the great flood legend, I myself wonder more about from where Revelations was imagined.
The grasshoppers vs the turtles, the fire from the heavens, etc.,etc.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 10:40 pm to Boudin
another force that changed life was Mt Toba.
from tracing genealogy/dna, back, they figure that after Mt Toba volcanic eruption, only 4,000 pairs of humans survived world wide.
from tracing genealogy/dna, back, they figure that after Mt Toba volcanic eruption, only 4,000 pairs of humans survived world wide.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:19 pm to scrooster
Great information and you may be right about humans here 50K years ago who died off.
This first link is from Science Daily (2004).
I saw this week a story about a site in California near San Diego that had Mastadon bones that appear to have been "processed" by humans 130K years ago for the marrow.
The second link is San Diego Tribune 4/25/2017.
LINK
LINK
This first link is from Science Daily (2004).
I saw this week a story about a site in California near San Diego that had Mastadon bones that appear to have been "processed" by humans 130K years ago for the marrow.
The second link is San Diego Tribune 4/25/2017.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:36 pm to CelticDog
It's almost as if hominids didn't have a purely static existence prior to the end of the last ice age when agriculture and civilization suddenly sprung up and populations exploded. It's almost as if some form of civilization always existed but was repeatedly built up only to be destroyed by cataclysm.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:37 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
Great information and you may be right about humans here 50K years ago who died off.
This first link is from Science Daily (2004).
I saw this week a story about a site in California near San Diego that had Mastadon bones that appear to have been "processed" by humans 130K years ago for the marrow.
The second link is San Diego Tribune 4/25/2017.
LINK
LINK
Damn! How ironic us that!
Pretty cool!
I have no doubt - never did.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:42 pm to Scoob
The Aztecs and Mayans had advanced mathematics and astronomy, but they were still practically stone-aged people. They had never invented the wheel, and had no knowledge of metallurgy beyond melting down gold. They had few domesticated animals to boot. Their written language was also not well developed. No where near the level of the Greeks.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:42 pm to DawgfaninCa
So Stargate was on point 
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:54 pm to Speckhunter2012
I just want to know who built all of those low stone walls around southern and central California.
Posted on 4/29/17 at 12:21 am to Speckhunter2012
quote:
Great information and you may be right about humans here 50K years ago who died off.
This first link is from Science Daily (2004).
I saw this week a story about a site in California near San Diego that had Mastadon bones that appear to have been "processed" by humans 130K years ago for the marrow.
The second link is San Diego Tribune 4/25/2017.
Interesting. I have never heard about that. If true, then the OOA theory has a lot of problems -- major problems.
I guess the question is were they human or some sort of earlier hominid like Neanderthals?
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:52 pm to kingbob
quote:
I just want to know who built all of those low stone walls around southern and central California.
So do I. It's a mystery right in my backyard.
The American Indians in the area said the walls have always been there and they don't know who built them either.
LINK
Posted on 4/29/17 at 8:08 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
The American Indians in the area said the walls have always been there and they don't know who built them either.
North American Indians were trying to keep the Mexican Indians out.
Posted on 4/29/17 at 10:52 pm to kingbob
Only when you understand the enormity of time can you realize that that is possible. I'd like to think that this era's society has produced such a huge quantity and quality of technology that it can't be wiped out like the others, without a trace, but obviously time erases it all and could have in the past.
Posted on 4/30/17 at 12:23 am to scrooster
quote:
Which is from where, I think, perhaps some of the dragon myths may have sprouted.
Every myth is based in fact, every legend based in some event transpiring in the past or some species or creature that interacted with our ancestors or some skull and bone stumbled-upon in ancient times.
I had a "young Earth" friend of mine tell me about a theory that humans did in fact live alongside dinosaurs. He pointed to the dragon myths prevalent in so many different civilizations. The hypothesis supposedly supports the notion that carbon dating is bunk and the Earth is really young.
However, maybe humans did live alongside dinosaurs...but further back than we assumed humans lived?
quote:
I myself wonder more about from where Revelations was imagined.
John's vision is fascinating. If you ascribe to the "living word of God" belief, as I do, He is still trying to tell us something and we should still be listening.
Posted on 4/30/17 at 12:56 am to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Zulu legends hold that they were worked by "artificially produced flesh and blood slaves created by the First People." These slaves, the Zulu legends recount, "went into battle with the Ape-Man" when "the great war star appeared in the sky" (see Indaba My Children, by the Zulu medicine man Credo Vusamazulu Mutwa). [Genesis Revisited]
Genesis 6:4 "The Nephilim [a powerful race of giants] were on the earth in those days- and also afterward- when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown."
The Book of Enoch, which is canon only to the Ethiopian and Eritrean Orthodox Christians (but nonetheless is more or less quoted in Jude's epistle) describes the Nephilim as the offspring of the Watchers, who are fallen angels.
This is all right before the great flood.
So, perhaps not aliens artificially producing flesh and blood slaves, but cast out angels.
Posted on 4/30/17 at 3:48 am to DawgfaninCa
quote:
I find it interesting that if the date is correct then it supports Sitchin's translations of Sumerian writings which he claims say ancient aliens came to the Earth to mine gold and created humans to mine the gold instead of the "gods" who revolted against doing it.
This is a very interesting take. I have heard about it on some of the "ancient aliens" shows that the History Channel used to air a lot. Never gave them much credibility but watched a few because they analyzed a lot of ancient architecture.
The gods using our predecessors for slave labor cuts against our innate sense of superiority as well as every religious tenet I know of. But it is a very interesting idea - may have to examine that more.
Thanks again.
Posted on 5/2/17 at 3:41 pm to Tiger4Liberty
quote:
So, perhaps not aliens artificially producing flesh and blood slaves, but cast out angels.
Perhaps angels(cast out or not) were ancient aliens.
Certainly the Zulu legend about the First People and Sumerian writings support the possibility.
Posted on 5/2/17 at 3:45 pm to AUstar
quote:
The American Indians in the area said the walls have always been there and they don't know who built them either.
quote:
North American Indians were trying to keep the Mexican Indians out.
That has been ruled out because the walls are not high enough to keep anyone out.
Posted on 5/2/17 at 4:21 pm to Tiger4Liberty
quote:
I had a "young Earth" friend of mine tell me about a theory that humans did in fact live alongside dinosaurs. He pointed to the dragon myths prevalent in so many different civilizations. The hypothesis supposedly supports the notion that carbon dating is bunk and the Earth is really young.
However, maybe humans did live alongside dinosaurs...but further back than we assumed humans lived?
This is where my brother and I find ourselves between a rock and a hard place.
After our first sea serpent sighting, we researched some of the ancient dragon myths and ancient North and South American Indian legends.
In an old National Geographic magazine we found this photo of an ancient Mixtec-Aztec Turquoise Serpent Breastplate.
We immediately realized this was not a depiction of an ordinary serpent or snake.
Of course the second head is for decorative purposes only and not depicting a real animal with two heads.
However, the heads depict an animal with a long row of sharp pointed teeth, a nose at the end of a long snout and eyebrows over the eyes.
The animal also has several radical vertical flexions or arches in its body directly behind its head.
It looks exactly like the type of animal my brother and I saw from only 20 yards away and what one eyewitness of the Stinson Beach sea serpent sighting said the animal's teeth looked like.
My brother and I have postulated that the animal may be some type of water dragon.
However, as soon as we postulate that the animal may be some type of water dragon, we are accused of supporting Young Earth Creationists even though we agree with scientists that the Earth is 4+ billion years old.
We don't support Young Earth Creationists' belief that the Earth is only 6,000 years old and we don't support the scientific community's belief that dragons are just a myth.
The Earth is 4+ billion years old and water dragons exist.
This post was edited on 5/2/17 at 5:37 pm
Page 6 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News