- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: American Conservatism is Fiddling While Rome Burns
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:02 am to troyt37
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:02 am to troyt37
quote:The problem is people only do the cost/benefit on the here and now, not years from now when all of this is chipped away at constantly.
the consequences of not fighting have to be almost as bad as fighting and losing.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:04 am to Caplewood
Weak bitches only concerned about getting reelected and not what is best for the country
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:05 am to troyt37
quote:
That being said, one of the primary accomplishments that republicans are constantly sold short on is being a stumbling block to socialist democrats trying to implement their agenda. Socialist democrats would have destroyed this country 20 years ago if it weren't for republicans, conservative or not.
fricking pathetic
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:06 am to Caplewood
quote:
Conservatism is the seven cheers for capitalism and the deafening silence on demographic change, feminism, and corporate malfeasance.
Feminism, whatever - but the rest of this is spot on. I've been surprised by how dim conservatives have become about capitalism, at least the form its now practiced in the US. There are several orders of magnitude more conservatives willing to fight for the liberal elite that cuck them than there are liberal elite doing the cucking. First, it's stupid - we're funding the destruction of the country we say we'll die for, and second, it's not a good look ... we look as retarded as the idiots rioting over "systemic racism."
quote:
It’s the free trade fetish.
This. Repeat comments above here.
quote:
This new right, which of yet has no name, is anchored in the realization that the conservative project in America today is fundamentally a counterrevolutionary one. We lost. They won
If we're talking public presence/perception, I can agree with this. If we're talking about where hearts/minds actually are, I don't think it's right. I believe a clear majority of Americans do not want socialism, open borders, defunded police departments, reparations, etc., etc. But it's long past time for the "silent majority" not only speak up, but to start acting.
This post was edited on 7/31/20 at 11:08 am
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:17 am to Caplewood
quote:
fricking pathetic
Well what have you, or the the political persuasion you identify with, done to stop the march toward marxism/socialism instituted and advocated by the democrat party?
Do tell.
ETA: Come on now, you can do better than a pussy arse down vote. I'm certain you aren't fricking pathetic. No way. Tell us all how you aren't even more fricking pathetic.
This post was edited on 7/31/20 at 11:20 am
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:29 am to troyt37
quote:
Well what have you, or the the political persuasion you identify with, done to stop the march toward marxism/socialism
We aren’t allowed in the public forum because of republicans like you that side with the left to cancel voices they don’t like
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:36 am to Caplewood
Fiscal conservatism, the more important policy for the country's future, died before rock 'n roll did.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:39 am to Caplewood
quote:
We aren’t allowed in the public forum because of republicans like you that side with the left to cancel voices they don’t like
You must be libertarian. Hate to tell you, but the only accomplishments libertarians can tout are instances where they have thwarted the republican/conservative agenda, by doing exactly what you accuse me of. And what's more is everyone with a higher than room temperature IQ knows this to be true. You aren't fooling anyone.
How pathetic is it to blame republicans for libertarian impotency? You folks have been around for 40 years or more, and have never held a majority on as much as a fricking school board in a country of 350 million people, but it isn't your fricked up beliefs, and half assed philosophy, it's republicans fault.
I should have just left my initial post, and ignored your thread, so cool story bro.
This post was edited on 7/31/20 at 11:41 am
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:41 am to troyt37
quote:
You must be libertarian.
quote:
room temperature IQ
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:43 am to Caplewood
quote:
quote:
You must be libertarian.
quote:
room temperature IQ
Still waiting to hear all the socialism killing accomplishments....
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:44 am to Caplewood
Stop wasting time talking to leftists.
Red pill the uninformed- amazing that there are people out there who dont know shite, but there are.
Red pill the uninformed- amazing that there are people out there who dont know shite, but there are.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:44 am to troyt37
You two probably have more in common than you think if you get past the faux machismo on the internet and actually talk to one another.
This post was edited on 7/31/20 at 11:49 am
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:45 am to boosiebadazz
There are some high quality melts in this thread. Keep going baws 
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:55 am to Caplewood
I’d consider myself a pragmatic libertarian. There are two things I disagree with in his classification of libertarians:
1) Border policy needs to align with social policy. In a vacuum, I would be ok with open borders with small government. My primary concern in the current environment is the huge size of the government and wellfare programs. As long as those exist, you MUST have strong borders. If you are giving government handouts then you damn well better make sure it’s going to people paying taxes and who are here legally. I’d add I also believe in path to citizenship. The government has allowed this to go on too long. The first priority is fixing the dam but I don’t see how deportation is a realistic option for dealing with the flood waters that have already accumulated.
2) In regards to globalization, we have long forgotten about the national security aspect of this. Beyond the social arguments of who is actually benefiting from global trade, we can not be dependent on countries like China that do not share our values and actively seek to undermine our government. Basically, I think there’s a lot more to consider in regards to globalization besides simply economics, specifically when dealing with countries that are not going to allow free markets themselves. This is where I think Trump has attracted me the most.
I do agree I’m not a conservative (I’m atheist and support other policies based on limiting government that conservatives would disagree with) but I do still think I represent an important demographic for Republicans to attract.
1) Border policy needs to align with social policy. In a vacuum, I would be ok with open borders with small government. My primary concern in the current environment is the huge size of the government and wellfare programs. As long as those exist, you MUST have strong borders. If you are giving government handouts then you damn well better make sure it’s going to people paying taxes and who are here legally. I’d add I also believe in path to citizenship. The government has allowed this to go on too long. The first priority is fixing the dam but I don’t see how deportation is a realistic option for dealing with the flood waters that have already accumulated.
2) In regards to globalization, we have long forgotten about the national security aspect of this. Beyond the social arguments of who is actually benefiting from global trade, we can not be dependent on countries like China that do not share our values and actively seek to undermine our government. Basically, I think there’s a lot more to consider in regards to globalization besides simply economics, specifically when dealing with countries that are not going to allow free markets themselves. This is where I think Trump has attracted me the most.
I do agree I’m not a conservative (I’m atheist and support other policies based on limiting government that conservatives would disagree with) but I do still think I represent an important demographic for Republicans to attract.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 11:58 am to Caplewood
quote:
American Conservatism is Fiddling While Rome Burns

Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:00 pm to Caplewood
conservatives are pussies. Straight up. No way around it.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:02 pm to Caplewood
The issues with conservatism are:
1. Too many “conservatives” only being conservative with regards to guns, abortion, and gay marriage.
2. Supporting corporate cronyism under the guise of “free market capitalism”
3. Being conservative with everyone’s money but the taxpayer money that goes to them personally
4. Constantly tilting at symptoms with shame based attacks on end-users while ignoring Policy sources of Problems that create these end users (immigration, emtala, entitlement policy, nepa, etc)
5. Opposing any and all government (indiscriminate cleaver budgeting) rather than attempting to create efficient effective government with a reduced scope of responsibilities
6. Complete apathy regarding public school curriculums except with respect to climate change and creationism/evolution.
7. Cowering to avoid “offense” to people whose job it is to run you out of a job
8. Apologizing to the mob for “missteps” you don’t honestly believe you were mistaken to say
9. Refusal to publicly dress down “conservatives” who betray conservative policy aims
10. Only supporting the constitution when it’s relevant to you while allowing the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments to be shredded by the Wars on Terror and Drugs.
1. Too many “conservatives” only being conservative with regards to guns, abortion, and gay marriage.
2. Supporting corporate cronyism under the guise of “free market capitalism”
3. Being conservative with everyone’s money but the taxpayer money that goes to them personally
4. Constantly tilting at symptoms with shame based attacks on end-users while ignoring Policy sources of Problems that create these end users (immigration, emtala, entitlement policy, nepa, etc)
5. Opposing any and all government (indiscriminate cleaver budgeting) rather than attempting to create efficient effective government with a reduced scope of responsibilities
6. Complete apathy regarding public school curriculums except with respect to climate change and creationism/evolution.
7. Cowering to avoid “offense” to people whose job it is to run you out of a job
8. Apologizing to the mob for “missteps” you don’t honestly believe you were mistaken to say
9. Refusal to publicly dress down “conservatives” who betray conservative policy aims
10. Only supporting the constitution when it’s relevant to you while allowing the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments to be shredded by the Wars on Terror and Drugs.
This post was edited on 7/31/20 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:11 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You two probably have more in common than you think if you get past the faux machismo on the internet and actually talk to one another.
I don't doubt it, but it is destined to be that way until libertarians can find a way to wrap their head around the reality that if they were actually as brilliant as they are in their own minds, it would be almost impossible to garner as small a percentage of the vote as they do. Much of the libertarian philosophy sounds great in a perfect world utopia. It's like a college professor who thinks he can tell me how to do the job that I've done for the last 25 years, so much better. If things actually worked like Professor Perfect says, then why is he going to work every day, making 250K and putting up with snot nosed kids, and not a millionaire, doing my job so much better than I ever could?
Think about opposing a physical barrier between the US and Mexico, because it will cost too much money, when we spend 4-5 times that amount EVERY year on the 15 million plus criminal illegals who simply walked across that border. Think about opposing a physical barrier, not because it costs too much money, but because if we did away with nearly 100 years of socialist welfare state federal spending and entitlements to citizen and criminal illegal alike, we wouldn't need to build a wall to stem the tide causing us to spend roughly 20 billion every year caring for the criminal illegals who walk across that border?
How do you find common ground with people who are so wrapped up in "if everything was magically how I want it" that they can't possibly support the first little baby step toward actually having things the way they want them?
This post was edited on 7/31/20 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:13 pm to troyt37
Did you even read the article I posted
This post was edited on 7/31/20 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:14 pm to Caplewood
Hopefully seeing how the left is not content with academia and the media and wants to control everything, including sports, will prod conservatives into action
Popular
Back to top



0










