- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: All we want is for the 6 contested States with election fraud allegations to be...
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:32 pm to ApexTiger
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:32 pm to ApexTiger
GREAT POST!
The US Government owes the general public the TRUTH!
That is all I ask, and that is all any decent person should expect, THE TRUTH!!!!! If TRUMP lost fair and square, like we are being told, then PROVE IT!
What is SO FRICKING HARD about revealing the TRUTH?
If the TRUTH is not revealed about the 2020 election, anarchy and civil unrest will reign over this country, maybe forever....
Is the TRUTH that elusive?
The US Government owes the general public the TRUTH!
That is all I ask, and that is all any decent person should expect, THE TRUTH!!!!! If TRUMP lost fair and square, like we are being told, then PROVE IT!
What is SO FRICKING HARD about revealing the TRUTH?
If the TRUTH is not revealed about the 2020 election, anarchy and civil unrest will reign over this country, maybe forever....
Is the TRUTH that elusive?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:33 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
quote:
Judges are lawyers. Lawyers don’t have the best reputation for virtue.
So no judges have no credibility?
No one educated in law should have the right to adjudicate the law? Should we just let the painted-faced, Buffalo-headed Q Shaman settle disputes?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:34 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
quote:in other words, people that know better than you and more than you said the stars didn’t violate their own law, but all you want is for Trump to win so you will say or believe anything that supports that position and disbelieve and ignore the truth.
Judges are lawyers. Lawyers don’t have the best reputation for virtue.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:35 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
The vote was lawfully certified.
is not synonymous with the total absence of voter fraud.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:35 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
All of them are crap with no substance.
I heard the testimony of several who were given time to speak in front of about 8 people in each of these state hearings that were put together to appease the noise being made, I don't know how the process works
the sworn affidavits, I don't think were even read
believe what you want
I am no lawyer, but there is plenty of fraud to review
and find out who is behind it, requires an investigation
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:36 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Suits are not forensic audits.
Again, if forensic audits were required by law, they would have been performed. But they’re not required.
You can’t demand forensic audits any more than you can require jellybean counts. Just because all of your post-election demands aren’t met does not mean you have been cheated.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:37 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
but there is plenty of fraud to review
Why do you think Trump’s voter fraud commission disbanded without finding significant voter fraud?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:38 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
There is no law that requires or calls for your demands to be met.
Election fraud is unlawful
the rest of your post is none-sense
If want to stiff arm 75 million people declaring you have not right to be heard or to demand an audit, well, that's a weak position to negotiate from...
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:40 pm to ApexTiger
quote:And was not proven in the appropriate venues
Election fraud is unlawful
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:41 pm to WDE24
quote:
And was not proven in the appropriate venues
This board? Your personal email?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:43 pm to ApexTiger
Trump alleged fraud before the 2016 general election and in the 2016 Iowa primary that Ted Cruz won. Why weren’t there calls for audits after those elections?
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:45 pm to WDE24
quote:
And was not proven in the appropriate venues
Can you define proof of election fraud?
I'd say, receiving mail in ballots filled out before they were actually mailed out is fraud.
If you listened to the testimony you would know this happened in Pennsylvania.
this is just one example of many.
can you guess which candidate benefited from those ballots?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:45 pm to CheEngineer
quote:
Bet you don’t.
Something tells me that there is no amount of evidence I could provide to persuade you.
But if you want to truth, do your own research. The state Supreme Court rulings are all public record, and I guarantee that none of them decided that the vote should be invalidated. Ergo, the law was followed.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:47 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Trump alleged fraud before the 2016 general election and in the 2016 Iowa primary that Ted Cruz won. Why weren’t there calls for audits after those elections?
The first debate question asked of Trump was telling
"Will you conceded if you lose?"
what the hell kind of question is that?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:47 pm to oldskule
quote:
If TRUMP lost fair and square, like we are being told, then PROVE IT!

They did prove it you just refuse to believe it.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:48 pm to ApexTiger
Because he has a habit of alleging fraud before elections. It’s his way of assuaging his inadequacy because his narcissism won’t let him admit he simply lost.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:50 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
election fraud
Everyone’s opinion that really matters disagrees with you. Every judge that heard the cases, all 50 Secretaries of State, a supermajority of Congress.
Sometimes, you lose. It doesn’t mean you were cheated.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:51 pm to ApexTiger
quote:Legally sufficient claims properly pled by the appropriate person and then supported by evidence presented in the appropriate tribunal that convinces the appropriate trier of fact that election fraud more likely than not occurred and that absent the fraud the result would have been different.
Can you define proof of election fraud?
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:57 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
Many suits have been heard by courts over the past 2 months and they have all been thrown out.
The cases have been matters of law concerning states allowing their own election laws to be violated and corrupted. They were not about the fraud.
Voter fraud will be investigated as specific criminal cased. Those take time to investigate, document, present to a grand jury, charge, arrest and try. That's the way the system works (or fails to work as the case might be).
Yes America, there is voter fraud. These recent cases prove it.
quote:
Philly Fraud Case Expands
The U.S. Justice Department this past week charged former Democratic congressman Michael Myers with stuffing ballot boxes, bribing an elected official, falsifying records, obstructing justice and voting multiple times in federal elections in Philadelphia.
Myers was the second official charged in the scheme.
Domenick DeMuro, a Democratic ward chairman in that city, admitted in a plea deal that he had "fraudulently stuffed the ballot box by literally standing in a voting booth and voting over and over, as fast as he could, while he thought the coast was clear," prosecutors said.
LINK
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:59 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
Something tells me that there is no amount of evidence I could provide to persuade you.
But if you want to truth, do your own research. The state Supreme Court rulings are all public record, and I guarantee that none of them decided that the vote should be invalidated. Ergo, the law was followed.
So you saying that’s a no from you. Thanks for admitting it.
Popular
Back to top
