- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Alabama judge allows male teen to sue on behalf of aborted fetus - Game Changer?
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:12 pm
Hmmmm, I wonder how this will play out...
quote:
A teenager in Alabama is suing an abortion clinic for terminating the life of his unborn child against his wishes. On Tuesday, an Alabama county court recognized the aborted fetus, "Baby Roe," as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, making the case one of the first of its kind
quote:
Ryan Magers, 19, of Madison County, claims his girlfriend got a medicated abortion at the Alabama Women's Center for Reproductive Alternatives in Huntsville in February 2017 when she was six weeks pregnant, according to legal documents, even though he urged her not to terminate the pregnancy. Alabama recognizes the personhood of a fetus, so Magers is suing on behalf of the fetus and himself.
quote:
“Baby Roe’s innocent life was taken by the profiteering of the Alabama Women’s Center and while no court will be able to bring Baby Roe back to life, we will seek the fullest extent of justice on behalf of Baby Roe and Baby Roe’s father,” Attorney Brent Helms said in a statement. “The time is ripe for consistency in Alabama’s jurisprudence: either we fully acknowledge the personhood of the unborn or we cherry pick which innocents we protect and which ones we trash for profit.”
quote:
Madison County probate court Judge Frank Barger allowed Magers to name his aborted child as a co-plaintiff in his case against Alabama Women's Center, a move that came just four months after the passage of an amendment that gave fetuses personhood, or the same legal rights as any other person, under the state constitution.
quote:
Helms believes the case could make it to the Supreme Court.
quote:
But the case has alarmed pro-choice activists.
quote:
On Twitter, Ilyse Hogue, the president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, called it a "very scary case" that is "asserting woman's rights third in line."
quote:
Others called it "unlawful and idiotic."
This post was edited on 3/6/19 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:15 pm to bamarep
quote:I had a feeling this would eventually happen.
Oh boy.
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:15 pm to DemonKA3268
I've always wondered what would happen if a unilateral abortion would ever be challenged in court if the father said he wanted to keep the child
This post was edited on 3/6/19 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:18 pm to DemonKA3268
quote:
Alabama Women's Center for Reproductive Alternatives
Creative name for "abortion clinic"...
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:20 pm to upgrayedd
quote:And under most circumstances, one can't make a baby without someone else. So the "it's her body malarkey" kind of goes out the window.
I've always wondered what would happen if a unilateral abortion would ever be challenged in court if the father said he wanted to keep the child
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:24 pm to DemonKA3268
quote:
And under most circumstances, one can't make a baby without someone else. So the "it's her body malarkey" kind of goes out the window.
The "it's her body" argument never held water for me. That child doesn't share the same DNA as any other part of her body.
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:27 pm to DemonKA3268
It's complete horse shite that the father has no say so in the matter.
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:27 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
The "it's her body" argument never held water for me. That child doesn't share the same DNA as any other part of her body.
Me either, it's a pathetic excuse for those who lack responsibility and accountability.
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:37 pm to JackieTreehorn
quote:Couldn't agree more
It's complete horse shite that the father has no say so in the matter.
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:39 pm to DemonKA3268

This post was edited on 3/6/19 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:39 pm to The Maj
quote:
Creative name
Hallmark of leftism.
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:40 pm to JackieTreehorn
quote:
It's complete horse shite that the father has no say so in the matter.
But the father would be financially responsible for the child if it was born.
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:42 pm to Statestreet
quote:I'm pretty sure that's how it is now.
But the father would be financially responsible for the child if it was born.
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:46 pm to DemonKA3268
Now a guy that is paying child’s support needs to sue saying he didn’t want the baby but the mom wouldn’t have an abortion. They need to set the rules straight. Either men have a say in a possible abortion or they don’t pay child support.
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:49 pm to DemonKA3268
I hope this guy wins. It’s incredibly scary that a man can have his child taken away from him in a moment by a woman’s decision and a doctor. Fathers should have equal rights before the baby is born, just like after the baby is born
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:53 pm to DemonKA3268
The mother may carry and birth the child but the father participated in it's creation and either cares for the child for the entirety of it's lifetime or pays child support to the mother for up to 18+ years depending on circumstances in almost all cases.
The fact that the father has never truly had a say in whether or not the child can be born, is mind boggling. Unless of course the father wants the child aborted too. That's fine in that scenario, amirite?...
The fact that the father has never truly had a say in whether or not the child can be born, is mind boggling. Unless of course the father wants the child aborted too. That's fine in that scenario, amirite?...
Popular
Back to top

15













