Started By
Message
locked post

Alabama judge allows male teen to sue on behalf of aborted fetus - Game Changer?

Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:12 pm
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21112 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:12 pm
Hmmmm, I wonder how this will play out...
quote:

A teenager in Alabama is suing an abortion clinic for terminating the life of his unborn child against his wishes. On Tuesday, an Alabama county court recognized the aborted fetus, "Baby Roe," as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, making the case one of the first of its kind
quote:

Ryan Magers, 19, of Madison County, claims his girlfriend got a medicated abortion at the Alabama Women's Center for Reproductive Alternatives in Huntsville in February 2017 when she was six weeks pregnant, according to legal documents, even though he urged her not to terminate the pregnancy. Alabama recognizes the personhood of a fetus, so Magers is suing on behalf of the fetus and himself.
quote:

“Baby Roe’s innocent life was taken by the profiteering of the Alabama Women’s Center and while no court will be able to bring Baby Roe back to life, we will seek the fullest extent of justice on behalf of Baby Roe and Baby Roe’s father,” Attorney Brent Helms said in a statement. “The time is ripe for consistency in Alabama’s jurisprudence: either we fully acknowledge the personhood of the unborn or we cherry pick which innocents we protect and which ones we trash for profit.”
quote:

Madison County probate court Judge Frank Barger allowed Magers to name his aborted child as a co-plaintiff in his case against Alabama Women's Center, a move that came just four months after the passage of an amendment that gave fetuses personhood, or the same legal rights as any other person, under the state constitution.
quote:

Helms believes the case could make it to the Supreme Court.
quote:

But the case has alarmed pro-choice activists.

quote:

On Twitter, Ilyse Hogue, the president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, called it a "very scary case" that is "asserting woman's rights third in line."
quote:

Others called it "unlawful and idiotic."
This post was edited on 3/6/19 at 3:41 pm
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52354 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:14 pm to
Oh boy.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
39711 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:15 pm to
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21112 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Oh boy.
I had a feeling this would eventually happen.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138114 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:15 pm to
I've always wondered what would happen if a unilateral abortion would ever be challenged in court if the father said he wanted to keep the child
This post was edited on 3/6/19 at 3:16 pm
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Alabama Women's Center for Reproductive Alternatives


Creative name for "abortion clinic"...
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21112 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

I've always wondered what would happen if a unilateral abortion would ever be challenged in court if the father said he wanted to keep the child
And under most circumstances, one can't make a baby without someone else. So the "it's her body malarkey" kind of goes out the window.
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
52976 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:21 pm to
frick yeah!
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53751 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:24 pm to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138114 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

And under most circumstances, one can't make a baby without someone else. So the "it's her body malarkey" kind of goes out the window.

The "it's her body" argument never held water for me. That child doesn't share the same DNA as any other part of her body.
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Member since Sep 2013
34940 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:27 pm to
It's complete horse shite that the father has no say so in the matter.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21112 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

The "it's her body" argument never held water for me. That child doesn't share the same DNA as any other part of her body.

Me either, it's a pathetic excuse for those who lack responsibility and accountability.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21112 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

It's complete horse shite that the father has no say so in the matter.
Couldn't agree more
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
65147 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:39 pm to
This post was edited on 3/6/19 at 3:40 pm
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Creative name


Hallmark of leftism.
Posted by Statestreet
Gueydan
Member since Sep 2008
13884 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

It's complete horse shite that the father has no say so in the matter.


But the father would be financially responsible for the child if it was born.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21112 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

But the father would be financially responsible for the child if it was born.
I'm pretty sure that's how it is now.
Posted by tjv305
Member since May 2015
12828 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:46 pm to
Now a guy that is paying child’s support needs to sue saying he didn’t want the baby but the mom wouldn’t have an abortion. They need to set the rules straight. Either men have a say in a possible abortion or they don’t pay child support.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
32737 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:49 pm to
I hope this guy wins. It’s incredibly scary that a man can have his child taken away from him in a moment by a woman’s decision and a doctor. Fathers should have equal rights before the baby is born, just like after the baby is born
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
35462 posts
Posted on 3/6/19 at 3:53 pm to
The mother may carry and birth the child but the father participated in it's creation and either cares for the child for the entirety of it's lifetime or pays child support to the mother for up to 18+ years depending on circumstances in almost all cases.

The fact that the father has never truly had a say in whether or not the child can be born, is mind boggling. Unless of course the father wants the child aborted too. That's fine in that scenario, amirite?...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram