Started By
Message

re: Airstrikes in Yemen

Posted on 1/11/24 at 10:29 pm to
Posted by CastleBravo
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2013
112 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

What if they sink one of our battleships? Then what?


The US Navy does not have any battleships.

We do have more admirals than we have actual ships, though.
Posted by Dale Gribble
Member since Aug 2014
253 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 10:58 pm to
Just read that the USS Florida can carry 154 tomahawks. That’s some serious firepower.
Posted by bleeng
The Woodlands
Member since Apr 2013
4086 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 10:59 pm to
Centcom: 60 targets hit in Yemen tonight at 16 locations, including command and control nodes, munitions depots, launching systems, production facilities, and air defense radar systems used by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels.

Over 100 precision-guided bombs and missiles launched.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
50313 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 3:06 am to
quote:

Sorry...you're in the wrong here. Houthi rebels have been attacking major shipping lanes, disrupting international commerce and driving up the price of essential goods. These are pirates and we are eliminating their ability to commit piracy.




It effects Europe far more than it does us.

How about Britain and it's pals France, Germany, Italy, etc handle this?

For some reason that never crosses anyone's mind.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 3:51 am to
quote:

It effects Europe far more than it does us.

How about Britain and it's pals France, Germany, Italy, etc handle this?

For some reason that never crosses anyone's mind.


Because one of the main objectives of the United States Navy is freedom of the seas. We guard the merchant transit lanes and protect international shipping from piracy/terrorism. We've been doing this since before the outbreak of World War II.
Posted by Asharad
Tiamat
Member since Dec 2010
5731 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 4:38 am to
quote:

We're basically servants of other countries and conservatives love it.
since when is our commander in chief a conservative?
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25984 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 5:00 am to
quote:

We do have more admirals than we have actual ships, though.


That would be interesting if it was remotely true.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56582 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 7:08 am to
quote:

Now they can start targeting military bases in the ME.
little late on that
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 7:10 am to
Israel’s plan going swimmingly. Soon enough American soldiers will be over there getting maimed and killed while they sit back.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424883 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 7:12 am to
quote:

Because one of the main objectives of the United States Navy is freedom of the seas. We guard the merchant transit lanes and protect international shipping from piracy/terrorism. We've been doing this since before the outbreak of World War II.


Also, disruption in commerce ends up hurting the US, as we benefit the most from global commerce.

There is a very good chance this solidifies our relations with China to the detriment of Russia, as well, which is a bonus. China was suffering from these blockades the most and Russia is effectively allied with the Houthi rebels
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262627 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 7:32 am to
quote:

Israel’s plan


Its not their plan.

Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19502 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 9:44 am to
quote:

in 1944 there were 256 flags for 6,084 ships; today there are 359 flag officers for 280 ships.


USNI (2018)

LINK
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19502 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 9:46 am to
quote:

There is a very good chance this solidifies our relations with China to the detriment of Russia, as well, which is a bonus. China was suffering from these blockades the most and Russia is effectively allied with the Houthi rebels


Chinese ships were exempted from the blockade.
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
12329 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 9:59 am to
I am generally against foreign entanglements but in the case of keeping shipping lanes and trade open then I am for the military being used to DESTROY the enemies ability to carry out such missions.

But destroy and leave. No rebuilding. No foreign aid. No building schools and hospitals and roads.

Destroy and leave.


Posted by CastleBravo
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2013
112 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:11 am to
I suggest you check the numbers for yourself.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19502 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 11:05 am to
For much of the post war period, the British acted as if it was still 1940, and they were still one of the worlds preeminent powers. There was a substantial gap between the way they spoke and acted, and their actual material resources.

I don’t want to overstate this, but many people, and many people in Washington, still think it’s 1990, and they don’t understand how the services have shrunk and decayed over the last 30 plus years.
This post was edited on 1/12/24 at 11:09 am
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19502 posts
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Finding targets in Yemen has proven more difficult than expected.

According to 2 US officials, after firing more than 150 precision-guided munitions, they only damaged about 20% of their targets.


The NY Times
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11831 posts
Posted on 1/14/24 at 11:13 am to
We have an extreme bloat of senior officers in the military. The ratio of flag officers to others is a disgraceful state of affairs and every military in history that has experienced this has suffered badly.

Also, it appears that 2 SEALs are missing off the coast of Somalia. There was a boarding op that took place in the Gulf of Aden. It seems one went in the water and another dove in to go after him. I don't know if they were fast roping down, climbing up, or what. Normally there are flotation devices, marker / strobe lights, dye packets etc for people - but for that environment, I don't know if that's standard. It would be standard for people working on a flight deck, for instance. But boarding a ship - I don't know. I would think SAR helicopters would have been in the air and close, and would come in to get those guys, but maybe not. I'm sure we're not getting all the relevant details.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram