re: Ahmaud Arbery had a history of claiming to be a jogger to cover for criminal activities.

quote:

---

Based on? I think it is sad what these two men are facing. However, they chose to intervene and there will assumably be consequences for decisions that were made and actions that were taken.

---

Dunno, I haven't kept up on any evidence coming out.

I'm just gonna leave this Arbery thing alone from here on out. There is really nothing left to say, and the two sides are really never going to come go an agreement based on these conversations. It is what it is.

quote:

---

quote:

---

they didn't immediately possess this knowledge

---

So the question would be, could they reasonably believe so

---

Let’s look at Senior’s own statement, as transcribed in the police report

quote:

---

McMichael (Senior) stated there have been several Break - ins in the neighborhood and further the suspect was caught on surveillance video. (Senior) stated he was in his front yard and saw the suspect from the break-ins "hauling arse" down Satilla Drive toward Burford Drive. (Senior) stated he then ran inside his house and called to (Junior) and said "Travis the guy is running down the street lets go". McMichael stated he went to his bedroom and grabbed his .357 Magnum and (Junior) grabbed his shotgun because they " didn ' t know if the male was armed or not" . Michael stated " the other night" they saw the same male and he stuck his hand down his pants which lead them to believe the male was armed

---

So, no “immediate knowledge.”

Senior saw a guy running down the street and thought the guy looked like someone he saw in a video ... a video in which nothing was stolen, BTW.

Based upon THAT alone, they chased a man through the streets in their vehicles and then killed him.

quote:

---

Not in the video. But things had been stolen

---

Very true. Some four months earlier and before the camera was installed.

Imagine a different house under construction on a different street.

Something gets stolen during the construction process, and the owner puts up a video camera. Several days later, he captures a video of Turbeaux and his wife wandering through to look at the bathroom layout.

A neighbor sees that video. Weeks later the neighbor (NOT the owner) sees Turbeaux jogging/running down the street.

Does he get to chase Turbeaux through the neighborhood while pointing guns at Turbeaux based upon his recollection of having seen that video weeks earlier? Does he get to shoot Turbeaux?

Also interesting is Senior’s description of the actual shooting, before he became aware of the video

quote:

---

McMichael stated they saw the unidentified male and shouted " stop stop , we want to talk to you" . Michael stated they pulled up beside the male and shouted stop again at which time Travis exited the truck with the shotgun. McMichael stated the unidentified male began to violently attack Travis and the two men then started fighting over the shotgun at which point Travis fired a shot and then a second later there was a second shot.

---

quote:

---

Lmao like 3 pages ago you were confident the McMichaels had immediate knowledge of a felony committed by AA. Now you haven’t kept up with the evidence.

---

That's not what I said.

Read again.

Also, quote it or run away to npr you lying trash heap

Yep and their dumbass friend documented the altercation. Without that their local police buddies let them walk.

quote:

---

Does he get to shoot Turbeaux based upon that video?

---

That didn't happen.

quote:

---

You said it was “completely true” that the McMichaels had immediate knowledge of the trespass. They didn’t.


fricking hack

---

Busted in a lie and lashing out.

Typical of trash.

quote:

---

Busted in a lie and lashing out.

Typical of trash.

---

You posted it. Are you drunk?