- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: After watching some of Tulsi’s hearing, it's clearcshe didn't want war with Iran
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:22 am to theballguy
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:22 am to theballguy
It’s a synonym for “kofefe”…
This post was edited on 3/21/26 at 8:23 am
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:23 am to Burt Reynolds
quote:Weird thing you are fapping over must have never served.
Don’t worry Jbird there will be troops on the ground soon enough.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:25 am to VOR
At least spell it correctly if you’re going to use it, goofball.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:26 am to theunknownknight
She probably thinks getting into a war with Iran won't be a short term and painless thing. Iranians are fighting back. A country can't be subdued by bombing alone.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:27 am to aTmTexas Dillo
How are Iranians fighting back?
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:27 am to Huge Richard
If these actions didn’t result in it now then it never will.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:28 am to SDVTiger
quote:
How are Iranians fighting back?
They still have 6,000 ballistic missiles hidden in 6000 caves.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:29 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
6,000 ballistic missiles
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:29 am to Huge Richard
quote:
These type of arguments also conveniently leave out the fact that the conditions in Iran have never been more advantageous for the overthrow the Islamic Republic, the death cult that has been in power for the last 50 years.
Cool. Let someone else do it.
You can recognize that Iran sucks and probably needs to be overthrown, while still not wanting the U.S. to be world policeman.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:31 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Thats not an answer
What say you? They also have 6000 pruning shears to cut off 12,000 fingers of anyone in Iran who oppose them.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:31 am to AlterEd
“Well beloved by the “MAGA base” is not exactly a guarantee of future success…
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:56 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
What say you?
How are the Iranians fighting back
You answered they have 6k missiles
That Aggie IQ
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:02 am to FLTech
quote:
It's clear that she knew Trump's views on Iran and if it upset her that much then she should not have applied for the position.
Take it a step further (and it is reflected in her remarks).
Her job as DNI is not to direct US foreign policy and military operations. Her job (among others) is to give the President (her boss) her best advice based on her assessment of the overall intelligence picture. She will not (and realistically could not have expected to) get "her way" on every decision.
Same with Vance.
Might she bail if she feels her opinion is never being considered/heard? Sure. But it's a stretch to say she's going to over this operation.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:08 am to theunknownknight
quote:
After watching some of Tulsi’s hearing, it's clear she didn't want war with Iran
Posted on 3/21/26 at 12:33 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Cool. Let someone else do it.
Sure, who else do they chant death to in the Islamic Republic’s government?
This post was edited on 3/21/26 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 3/21/26 at 1:16 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
No one WANTED war with Iran in the USA. But it was necessitated.
Necessitated by what? Tulsi and Trump both confirmed Iran’s nuclear capabilities were obliterated and they were not in the process of rebuilding their nuclear program.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 1:21 pm to Huge Richard
quote:
Sure, who else do they chant death to in the Islamic Republic’s government?
No one else tries to be world policeman. It’s a cyclical argument.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 1:32 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Necessitated by what? Tulsi and Trump both confirmed Iran’s nuclear capabilities were obliterated and they were not in the process of rebuilding their nuclear program.
What else did she say? Oh you know, the thing. That Iran’s uranium stockpile remains a factor of concern, and that the IC continues to monitor for potential orders from the artist formerly known as Ayatollah Khomeini to restart the program. Sooooo…..when you appropriately take all that relevant context into consideration, it tells a bit of a different story than what some of you very, very much wish it did, for personal narrative purposes.
Popular
Back to top



1







