- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Affecting the outcome of a federal election" tells us everything we need to know
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:01 pm to PointsInCase
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:01 pm to PointsInCase
0
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:02 pm to Smeg
quote:"Affecting the election" in this context means doing things barred by law to influence the outcome of an election. You can't just make up your own interpretation of something and argue it as truth.
Who ISN'T attempting to "affect the outcome of the election." Every journalist who publishes an opinion Every political commercial on radio or television Any person who puts a campaign sign on their lawn Any user who tweets something political They are ALL trying to "affect the outcome" and influence votes.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:04 pm to PointsInCase
quote:
"Affecting the election" in this context means doing things barred by law to influence the outcome of an election.
Are you implying that confidentiality agreements are against the law?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:06 pm to Smeg
quote:
Sorry bud, but telling the truth and revealing facts isn't affecting the outcome in an illegal way.
So you're happy with Wikileaks publishing Hillary's emails.
Good to know.
If someone had leaked emails they had with Hillary then that's legal. Hacking them and timing their release to inflict damage is very illegal.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:07 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I kinda heard this argument but didn't get the full context. They're saying a campaign contribution turned the tide of the election? How so?
The Russian's $7400 dollar ad buy on Facebook swung Indiana RED for starters.
Trump's settlement with the two tramps was in negotiations before he ran for office but could have cost him the puritan vote in Utah.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:08 pm to MrLSU
quote:
MrLSU
MELT
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:09 pm to MrLSU
quote:
The Russian's $7400 dollar ad buy on Facebook swung Indiana RED for starters.
WOW and Hilary spent billions to lose
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:09 pm to OchoDedos
quote:
That constitutes a conspiracy. They could have buried Cohen with a conspiracy charge. They didnt bury Cohen because there was no conspiracy. Cohen fricked up all on his greedy arse own.
We know that AMI and Cohen (at Trump's direction) conspired to break the law. That has been asserted by the SDNY. They don't have to charge every single violation, remember Cohen did plea, so maybe this would have been added if they were forced to go to trial.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:09 pm to 007tiger
quote:
If someone had leaked emails they had with Hillary then that's legal. Hacking them and timing their release to inflict damage is very illegal
So are you, or are you not for "telling the truth and revealing facts"?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:10 pm to MrLSU
quote:
The Russian's $7400 dollar ad buy on Facebook swung Indiana RED for starters.
Citation needed
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:11 pm to Smeg
quote:
So are you, or are you not for "telling the truth and revealing facts"?
I'm all for it, if its legal.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:11 pm to Smeg
quote:Nice straw man.
Are you implying that confidentiality agreements are against the law?
Confidentiality agreements are obviously very legal. In this case, the payment made under the terms of the confidentiality agreement was illegal because paying someone off to not say something bad about someone running for Preaident is illegal.
The only way to get caught doing this is to be stupid.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:12 pm to Strannix
quote:
WOW and Hilary spent billions to lose
So have numerous campaigns. Don't see her implicated in 2 federal crimes.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:14 pm to 007tiger
quote:
I'm all for it, if its legal.
Who committed a crime in WikiLeaks publishing Hillary's emails?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:15 pm to 007tiger
quote:
So have numerous campaigns. Don't see her implicated in 2 federal crimes.
They paid Fusion GPS 12 million dollars to employ foreign agents to "affect the election"
Sorry youre still being a giant pussy over her losing.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:16 pm to PointsInCase
quote:
Confidentiality agreements are obviously very legal. In this case, the payment made under the terms of the confidentiality agreement was illegal because paying someone off to not say something bad about someone running for Preaident is illegal.
Adding to your point. The Trump org fraudulently mislabeled their repayment to cohen for Stormy's money. That has federal and state law implications.
It's a state felony if the fraud was in furtherance of another illegal scheme. This is terrible for Trump and the Trump Org. the Trump org will be indicted, I'd bet allot of money.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:18 pm to boomer16
quote:
o keep this from getting out to avoid bad press that would negatively impact his eventual successful campaign.
You mean the 10 women the Dem’s paid to accuse him weren’t enough?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:18 pm to Strannix
quote:
They paid Fusion GPS 12 million dollars to employ foreign agents to "affect the election"
Sorry youre still being a giant pussy over her losing.
Indictments or it didn't happen.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:20 pm to Hurricane Mike
quote:
You mean the 10 women the Dem’s paid to accuse him weren’t enough?
So you got proof that "Dems" paid these women?
Let's see your "proof"
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:20 pm to 007tiger
quote:
Indictments or it didn't happen.
They're sealed right now, but you will see soon enough.....
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News