- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Admit it, this administration is a total shitshow
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:02 pm to TheWalrus
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:02 pm to TheWalrus
This administration has been scrutinized 1,000 times more than any other. That’s why you see so much turn over. People are being fired for stuff Obama and his admin did for 8 years without consequence.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:03 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
Other than that, nothing he's done has any permanency
Well there have been the significant changes to the judiciary makeup, which could arguably be the biggest (if overlooked) part of his legacy so far.
Problem is, he really doesn’t get credit for the judiciary changes as the GOP establishment set him up with the vacancies and made it a top priority to push the appointments through.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:04 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
quote:
with a whole heaping of brand damage for good measure.
Only 2 years after W left office with a 27% approval rating (lowest in history), the republicans gained the most seats in a midterm election since the 1930s.
There is no evidence that "brand" damage" exists in American politics. Voter are fickle and have short memories.
This is a good bit different, and the R's got that advantage back as much because of Obama as they did anything they actually did.
Brand damage does exist in American politics. Look at the R's post-1929. They paid for that for a damn generation, at the least.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:06 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
quote:
He won't address spending because he knows that truly taking a sword to the federal budget means a hard and direct impact on his primary constituency:
In his defense even if he wanted to cut spending there’s no way in hell thats happening with this joke of a Congress.
This Congress isn't any different than most, and I will hold Trump to the same standard as I hold every other President. It's the executive branch's job to wheel and deal, negotiate, give and take, and find common ground. That's what good Presidents do.
That statement sounds, frankly, almost identical to what I heard from liberals during the Obama years. "Congress isn't cooperating!" Tough shite. It's his job to make them cooperate.
This post was edited on 3/22/18 at 11:07 pm
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:07 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:Yea, but the great depression is a historical novelty and FDR was a political miracle. Also....WW2
Look at the R's post-1929. They paid for that for a damn generation, at the least.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:10 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
quote:
Look at the R's post-1929. They paid for that for a damn generation, at the least.
Yea, but the great depression is a historical novelty and FDR was a political miracle. Also....WW2
Dude, except for two brief periods with slim majorities, the R's didn't get the House back with any permanency until the damn 1990's. That is way more than FDR and WW2.
This post was edited on 3/22/18 at 11:11 pm
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:13 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
This is the second post of yours I've seen in ten minutes where you can't write a complete sentence.
Says the guy who can't properly punctuate an appositional phrase, and doesn't know the proper usage of "where"....
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:13 pm to AbuTheMonkey
I disagree. Congress has just as much power as the POTUS and both parties hate this President. I think it’s different than the Obama years because Obama was an ideologue who wanted nothing to do with an opposition Congress. Trump has actually offered some pragmatic solutions but it hasn’t worked out. I do agree with you that Trump has been a failure in negotiating with them and a very bad leader overall.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:13 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
with someone like George W at the helm.
Just hold on, Trumps moving that way..
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:15 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
Let’s get back to being the party of integrity with someone like George W at the helm.
The president of silence and do nothing? Hell NO!!!
The ruckus may not be pleasant but the results are just fine. Frick DC and all the corrupt do nothing bitches who are in it.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:17 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
The constant staff turnover is a joke.
the most unsettling part imo
I've stopped counting at this point
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:17 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
except for two brief periods with slim majorities, the R's didn't get the House back with any permanency until the damn 1990's
Yet from 1930s to 1990s, there were plenty of periods where conservative policy was being passed by congress. 1980s and 1990s econ policy, for example.
Many of those dems were blue dog or conservatives from the south who kept on getting reelected due to incumbency.,
On the presidential level, republicans were back in power in the 50s.
Look at another example: watergate. republicans were winning in landslides only 4 years after nixon resigne.d
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:17 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
The broken campaign promises are alarming.
Thank your Congressmen for that.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:22 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
I disagree. Congress has just as much power as the POTUS and both parties hate this President. I think it’s different than the Obama years because Obama was an ideologue who wanted nothing to do with an opposition Congress. Trump has actually offered some pragmatic solutions but it hasn’t worked out. I do agree with you that Trump has been a failure in negotiating with them and a very bad leader overall.
I mean, I have to see what some of these pragmatic solutions are, because everything I've seen has been anything but pragmatic or has been half-baked.
There is just no competency. With some exceptions (Mattis, McMaster - gone, Cohn - gone, Icahn - gone, maybe Tillerson - gone), he's hired a terribly incompetent staff, and he has his damn daughter and son-in-law as prominent faces of the administration. If that were a Democrat, every single person on this board would be, rightfully, screaming until Kingdom come about how incompetent and borderline illegal and nepotistic that shite is.
I've never voted for a Democrat in a federal race in my life and probably won't be any time soon, but I didn't vote for Trump and sure as shite won't be going forward. The party is a long, long way from where it was when Jack Kemp Republicans could proudly pull the lever.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:24 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
Admit it, you are a total shitshow
FIFY, keep melting.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:24 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Look at the R's post-1929. They paid for that for a damn generation, at the least.
Yea, but the great depression is a historical novelty and FDR was a political miracle. Also....WW2
Do either of you think that a large bloc of voters vote on that info today?
FFS we are looking at limiting social media. FB and Twitter consume 75%+ of the retarded masses.
Most aren't voting on things that matter. They just want to walk into traffic while looking at their phone and sue the person that hit their dumb arse.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:25 pm to TheWalrus
We can agree that you're a fricking idiot.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:27 pm to TheWalrus
I am a Trump supporter from the beginning but this is the result of running and winning without a support system and advisors in place. It’s going to be chaotic because there is no experience or exposure to dealing with or having connections to the people who run in those circles.
So you get Trump trying to mash things and people together, without compromising his message. It’s tough when there isn’t a pool of people to pull from with like minded ideas, specifically when many of those ideas are not thoroughly defined.
So you get Trump trying to mash things and people together, without compromising his message. It’s tough when there isn’t a pool of people to pull from with like minded ideas, specifically when many of those ideas are not thoroughly defined.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:27 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:Pretty inept in those days.
The party is a long, long way from where it was when Jack Kemp Republicans could proudly pull the lever.
Better to be a shitshow that is accomplishing something than looking good but spineless.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:28 pm to TheWalrus
What broken campaign promises?
Popular
Back to top


0






