- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:29 pm to dcbl
And I don't care about staff turnover
Not even sure little
Not even sure little
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:30 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
The party is a long, long way from where it was when Jack Kemp Republicans could proudly pull the lever.
jack kemp.... yea the party was soooo great when he was on ticket.

Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
quote:
except for two brief periods with slim majorities, the R's didn't get the House back with any permanency until the damn 1990's
Yet from 1930s to 1990s, there were plenty of periods where conservative policy was being passed by congress. 1980s and 1990s econ policy, for example.
Many of those dems were blue dog or conservatives from the south who kept on getting reelected due to incumbency.,
On the presidential level, republicans were back in power in the 50s.
Look at another example: watergate. republicans were winning in landslides only 4 years after nixon resigne.d
Perhaps you're right, but you know I am no chicken little. This feels different. I really, truly believe that the Republicans are going to be hurting for a good long while after this. In a way that W could never do. The vaguely racist shite all on its own that Trump spews on occasion is going to really hurt. The electorate is getting less white every single year, and I'd surmise that just demographic turnover between 2016 and 2020 all by itself, with the exact same voting patterns, would result in a D victory. And it won't be someone who might occasionally be willing to play ball like Bill.
Republicans need to keep the message focused: economic growth, fiscal health, market-based solutions for healthcare and education, RACIALLY INCLUSIVE, free speech, open markets, sustain some level (less than now, especially for 65+) of social welfare net, etc., etc.
This post was edited on 3/22/18 at 11:37 pm
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:36 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
quote:
The party is a long, long way from where it was when Jack Kemp Republicans could proudly pull the lever.
jack kemp.... yea the party was soooo great when he was on ticket.
I care ultimately about policy, and Clinton wasn't nearly as off-center on policy for a lot of Republicans as this next wave of Dems is going to be. Watch out, dude. You start threads daily on how screwed up these viewpoints are, and it's coming. Trump owns a not insignificant piece of that.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:36 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:IMpossible to do when certain policy preferences such as less welfare, less gov't spending, are deemed racist by the media.
RACIALLY INCLUSIVE
Impossible to do when any suggestion that immigration be reformed is deemed racist and hateful.
Abu, name me a single election in your lifetime when liberals were not calling republicans racist.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:38 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
I care ultimately about policy, and Clinton wasn't nearly as off-center on policy for a lot of Republicans as this next wave of Dems is going to be. Watch out, dude. You start threads daily on how screwed up these viewpoints are, and it's coming. Trump owns a not insignificant piece of that.
If the new wave of dems start going full bernie and full on SJW, lots of people will flee the party, including college educated whites and people in the tech sector. It would probably cost them asians, as well.
Nothing happens in a vacuum.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:41 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
quote:
RACIALLY INCLUSIVE
IMpossible to do when certain policy preferences such as less welfare, less gov't spending, are deemed racist by the media.
Impossible to do when any suggestion that immigration be reformed is deemed racist and hateful.
Ignore them. They've been around forever.
Trump, in particular, inflames those things and gives an impression that he is the white man's candidate more than anything else. Look at ethnically East Asian and Indian voting patterns this past election compared to what they were before - much more heavily D than typical.
There are ways to get around that for Republicans, but this current crop isn't clever enough or smart enough to do it, especially Trump and his staff. Take away the fricking Twitter account, for starters.
quote:
Abu, name me a single election in your lifetime when liberals were not calling republicans racist.
Literally, don't care. Find a way to get it done. Expect high standards for leaders and make them meet them. Not the other way around.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:44 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
quote:
I care ultimately about policy, and Clinton wasn't nearly as off-center on policy for a lot of Republicans as this next wave of Dems is going to be. Watch out, dude. You start threads daily on how screwed up these viewpoints are, and it's coming. Trump owns a not insignificant piece of that.
If the new wave of dems start going full bernie and full on SJW, lots of people will flee the party, including college educated whites and people in the tech sector. It would probably cost them asians, as well.
Nothing happens in a vacuum.
Obviously, but if they get someone who's politically competent and manage to get legislation through, that is lasting damage - the kind that can bring a country to its knees. Imagine a Elizabeth Warren actually in the White House.
That's what liberals see right now with Trump, but Trump isn't actually competent or good enough to put a good chunk of what he believes into passed legislation.
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:48 pm to AbuTheMonkey
What is all that jibber jabber
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:49 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:wrong.
Look at ethnically East Asian and Indian voting patterns this past election compared to what they were before - much more heavily D than typical.
Asian vote was actually slightly more republican in 2016 than in 2012, or nearly identical. (Think it was 70-27 both times)
Surveys show asian americans are firmly to the left on economic issues.
this study
Asian americans :
1) Much more likely to support Obamacare than general population
2)FAR more likely to support gun bans than general population (90%)
3)Extremely supportive of minimum wage laws (80%+ support)
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:53 pm to TheWalrus
I up voted you at
Then regretted it and felt used at
Another troll in our midst.
quote:
I still think this is better than Clinton or Bernie of course
Then regretted it and felt used at
quote:
Let’s get back to being the party of integrity with someone like George W at the helm.
Another troll in our midst.
Posted on 3/23/18 at 12:09 am to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
but Trump isn't actually competent or good enough to put a good chunk of what he believes into passed legislation.
Oh FFS he doesn't have a congress that will support his views
fricking Rand Paul could be President and Ryan and McConnel would shut him down.
Good lord man.
Posted on 3/23/18 at 12:13 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
wrong.
Asian vote was actually slightly more republican in 2016 than in 2012, or nearly identical. (Think it was 70-27 both times)
Surveys show asian americans are firmly to the left on economic issues.
this study
Asian americans :
1) Much more likely to support Obamacare than general population
2)FAR more likely to support gun bans than general population (90%)
3)Extremely supportive of minimum wage laws (80%+ support)
You've got me with 2012, but take a look at 2000.
Your own link:
quote:
• Asian Americans are shifting in party identification towards the Democratic Party, and exclusionary rhetoric is a likely cause o There has been a 12-point increase in the proportion of Asian Americans who identify as Democrats from 2012 to 2016 (pp. 27-28) o Bolstering evidence from 2014, our survey indicates that Asian American registered voters, including Independents, will punish candidates with antiimmigrant and anti-Muslim views (pp. 17-18)
Trump and his ilk are a continuation of that. Republicans are going to fricking lose long-term because of shite like this. It took nearly a damn century to get the Irish and Italians on board a Republican platform because of nativist shite. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Posted on 3/23/18 at 12:15 am to MrLarson
quote:
quote:
but Trump isn't actually competent or good enough to put a good chunk of what he believes into passed legislation.
Oh FFS he doesn't have a congress that will support his views
fricking Rand Paul could be President and Ryan and McConnel would shut him down.
Good lord man.
As said before, I heard the same excuse from Obama supporters.
Either you're good enough as a leader, influencer, and negotiator to get your legislation passed, or you are not.
Trump is, quite obviously, more in the Obama mold than he is in the Reagan mold when it comes to this.
He's a shitty leader, a shitty politician, a shitty manager, and doesn't know what he is doing. It's not hard to admit that.
The guy has spent his entire life in his dad's business and hasn't been truly challenged (and whom he has then not fired) by thoughtful people in his organizations over the years. I think that's pretty obvious at this point.
This post was edited on 3/23/18 at 12:18 am
Posted on 3/23/18 at 12:17 am to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
Trump and his ilk are a continuation of that. Republicans are going to fricking lose long-term because of shite like this. It took nearly a damn century to get the Irish and Italians on board a Republican platform because of nativist shite. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
How do you explain this?
In 1996 bob dole won the asian vote by 6 points.
In 2000, W lost the asian vote by 15 points
21 point swing...can't blame trump or "exclusionary" rhetoric for that.
But here is the point you are missing: trump turned off some groups, but brought in some groups as well. He did better with union voters than any republican in the history of modern America. There were counties all over the midwest that voted for trump by double digits that last voted GOP in 1928.
Nothing exists in a vacuum.
Posted on 3/23/18 at 12:19 am to AbuTheMonkey
quote:Reagan signed massive spending bills like this. Federal spending rose during his years in office. He got his lunch money stolen on immigration reform.
Trump is, quite obviously, more in the Obama mold than he is in the Reagan mold when it comes to this.
Posted on 3/23/18 at 12:23 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
quote:
Trump and his ilk are a continuation of that. Republicans are going to fricking lose long-term because of shite like this. It took nearly a damn century to get the Irish and Italians on board a Republican platform because of nativist shite. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
How do you explain this?
In 1996 bob dole won the asian vote by 6 points.
In 2000, W lost the asian vote by 15 points
21 point swing...can't blame trump or "exclusionary" rhetoric for that.
But here is the point you are missing: trump turned off some groups, but brought in some groups as well. He did better with union voters than any republican in the history of modern America. There were counties all over the midwest that voted for trump by double digits that last voted GOP in 1928.
Nothing exists in a vacuum.
A bit of immigration from poorer Asian countries, a bit of unsaid racial shite (which Trump took to the extreme), and other factors.
How about this stat: 50% of American Asians voted for Republicans in the 2014 mid-terms (to 49% Democrats), while that number dropped to 14% in 2016. The Asian % number for D's didn't reach the 1996 number again until 2016.
Popular
Back to top


0




