- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Adios Bump Stocks
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:35 pm to thingshavechanged
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:35 pm to thingshavechanged
What 2nd amendment hating, big government democrat do we have to blame for this?
3
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:37 pm to Green Chili Tiger
Hell, Obama even reduced wait times for BATFE form applications. Trump hasn't done shite but ban bump stocks.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:38 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
What 2nd amendment hating, big government democrat do we have to blame for this?
I don't like it either, but please point out the Dems who are against the measure.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:39 pm to thingshavechanged
I'm pro gun all the way, and I don't have a problem with a bump stock ban. No practical use other than to simulate full auto, which is also banned. Some of you snowflakes get your panties in a bunch over anything.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:40 pm to slinger1317
quote:
I'm pro gun all the way, and I don't have a problem with a bump stock ban.
Nice non sequitur. You are certainly NOT pro gun all the way.
quote:
No practical use other than to simulate full auto,
Cite me the "practical" requirement in the Second Amendment.
quote:
which is also banned.
And shouldn't be
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:40 pm to slinger1317
quote:
I'm pro gun all the way, and I don't have a problem with a bump stock ban. No practical use other than to simulate full auto, which is also banned. Some of you snowflakes get your panties in a bunch over anything.
Almost everything about your post is bullshite.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:41 pm to Damone
quote:
And shouldn't be
And isn't.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:42 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Right, but not easily accessible. I would argue that the current regulations and law as to automatic weapons are an undue burden on the exercise of a constitutional right.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:42 pm to thingshavechanged
Well, I hope everyone "feels better" now "we did something."
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:42 pm to Damone
quote:
Cite me the "practical" requirement in the Second Amendment.
I believe our forefathers had common sense, which you aren't using here. Or you just want to be a contrarian.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:43 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Almost everything about your post is bullshite.
Do you mind explaining that further?
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:43 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:
Well, I hope everyone "feels better" now "we did something."
Surely the Democrats will be satisfied and not take any further steps to infringe on Second Amendment rights. We're done here boys!
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:43 pm to thingshavechanged
Who cares? No one actually uses them anyway. It was just a buzz word to make Dems feel like they are limiting people’s freedom. They can have that win. We actually are inching closer to having suppressors being unregulated so common folks can have them for less hearing loss. That’s what I want way more than a “bump” stock. Rounds are too expensive to be wasting them with that crap.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:44 pm to Damone
quote:
I would argue that the current regulations and law as to automatic weapons are an undue burden on the exercise of a constitutional right.
Of course they are. But they're not banned and, strangely, anti-gun folks use the misconception that they are to make some of their points.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:44 pm to slinger1317
quote:
I believe our forefathers had common sense
Which is why when the Second Amendment was authored it contemplated simple farmers possessing the exact same weaponry as uniformed soldiers.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:45 pm to Chocolate Jesus
quote:
Who cares? No one actually uses them anyway. It was just a buzz word to make Dems feel like they are limiting people’s freedom. They can have that win.
Get out of here with that common sense argument. You either want everyone to have a bazooka or you are a tree hugger. No room for common sense in this argument.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:45 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
not a gun.
Should we ban magazines, triggers and firing pins? You know, because parts of a gun are not guns by your logic.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:45 pm to thingshavechanged
And just like that zero lives were saved.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:46 pm to Michael Hayes
[Meh. I have plenty of rubber bands available.]
[Or a belt loop and a thumb.]
Which, of course, become part of the argument in support of banning AR15s.
[Or a belt loop and a thumb.]
Which, of course, become part of the argument in support of banning AR15s.
Posted on 3/29/19 at 12:47 pm to Damone
quote:
it contemplated simple farmers possessing the exact same weaponry as uniformed soldiers
For the sake of debate, where would this end? The military has automatic weapons, tanks, drones, etc. Do you think a simple farmer should have that as well?
The "slippery slope" argument works both ways.
And FTR, I am pro gun
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News