- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ACLU: Trans women are women!
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:16 pm to Seldom Seen
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:16 pm to Seldom Seen
No they’re not
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:19 pm to Seldom Seen
Doesn’t this take away from their identity as trans? The fact is they aren’t women biologically. Shouldn’t they be proud of who they are?
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:23 pm to Seldom Seen
When is International Men's Day?
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:24 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
ACLU: Trans women are women!
agreed. Just like taping a horn on a horse's head makes it a unicorn.
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:25 pm to Seldom Seen
if a trans "woman" commits a crime and is convicted, where do they send "her" to prison? A men's prison or a women's prison?
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:29 pm to fr33manator
quote:
So...don’t trust the science?
This is so confusing. So do we or don't we?
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:29 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
ACLU: Trans women are women!
Now stop criticizing this! Every cloud has a silver lining. If I want to temporarily identify as a woman in order to scope out some hot babes in the shower in a locker room, don’t judge!
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:30 pm to Seldom Seen
if trans women are real women, why do they need the qualifier of "trans" when referring to them? shouldnt they just be called women? but they arent, therefore, potato.
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:31 pm to DesScorp
Wasn’t that Billy Squire actually?
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:34 pm to fr33manator
quote:
So...don’t trust the science?
Exactly. At least according to this Georgetown Law Professor:
.... We allow some differences in capability to affect sports outcomes without calling out those with an edge as cheaters. Indeed, we admire many of these advantages, whether we believe they’re bestowed by God or good fortune: we praise competitors for their strength, speed, endurance, agility, toughness, discipline, resolve, and more.
And here’s the key: the lines we draw between the competitive edges we accept, even admire, and those we think unfair are the stuff of our culture, not our science. Wrestlers compete in weight classes — we reject a contest between a 125 pounder and a 195 pounder as a mismatch — but we’re OK with a 6’ 4” high-school basketball center’s unequal struggle under the rim against an opposing team’s 7-footer.
We should say no to attempts to push back against this acceptance by misusing “science” to brand birth-anatomy difference as “cheating” or otherwise unfair. More broadly, we should recognize that in sports, as in the rest of life, we all have competitive edges and weaknesses — and that judgments about which are and aren’t fair are matters of culture and politics, not biology.
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:38 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Full credit goes to Babylon Bee, I think. 
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:38 pm to Seldom Seen
So a woman can have a nut sack?
I looked the word woman up. No mention of a nut sack. Im dumbfounded.
I looked the word woman up. No mention of a nut sack. Im dumbfounded.
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:41 pm to Bulldogblitz
quote:
When their bones are dug up in 1000 years, what will they be?
An evolutionary mistake?
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:42 pm to landmanner
quote:
So a woman can have a nut sack?
I looked the word woman up. No mention of a nut sack. Im dumbfounded.
Better stated, if as an Alabama fan, you have the ability to teabag an unsuspecting, inebriated LSU fan after Bama beats that arse again in 2021...you aren’t a woman! I kid, I kid!
This post was edited on 3/8/21 at 4:56 pm
Popular
Back to top


0













