- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ACB is OFICIALLY on the court, and the Pennsylvania Dems are nervous
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:22 pm
No sooner had she taken her judicial oath this morning (thus, making her "official" and able to participate in operations of the Court) that the Pennsylvania election stealing Dems filed a Motion to Recuse her from the writ filed in response to the "signature match" ruling from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
LINK
it's chock full of reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
LINK
it's chock full of reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
This post was edited on 10/27/20 at 1:24 pm
12
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:24 pm to udtiger
It’s all crumbling down for Wolf and his minions.
If they’re so confident in their “lead” you’d think they’d be fine with this. Truth is, they know Joe lost their state last Thursday night.
If they’re so confident in their “lead” you’d think they’d be fine with this. Truth is, they know Joe lost their state last Thursday night.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:25 pm to udtiger
quote:
Against this backdrop, and in the aftermath of Justice Barrett’s nomination,
a public poll reflected significant concern with her presiding over matters related to
the presidential election. The poll, conducted by research firm SSRS on behalf of
CNN, asked whether Justice Barrett “should or should not promise to recuse herself
from any cases which could affect the outcome of this year's presidential election.”
Of the respondents, 56% said that Justice Barrett should recuse herself from such
matters, while 34% said she should not (10% had no opinion).
Why does dipshit Joe six pack CNN viewer's opinion matter on this issue?
These people are not educated enough on the issue to have a valid opinion.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:25 pm to udtiger
quote:
Dems filed a Motion to Recuse her from the writ filed in response to the "signature match" ruling from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Good luck with that Penn
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:26 pm to jclem11
quote:
Why does dipshit Joe six pack CNN viewer's opinion matter on this issue?
These people are not educated enough on the issue to have a valid opinion.
I was just about to post this. What a joke.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:26 pm to jclem11
quote:
Why does dipshit Joe six pack CNN viewer's opinion matter on this issue?
These people are not educated enough on the issue to have a valid opinion.
when I was reading the citations/authorities and saw the CNN poll, I LOL'd IRL
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:27 pm to udtiger
Why should she recuse herself?
Hell, all the members of the Supreme Court would have to recuse themselves since they were all elected by one party or another.
Hell, all the members of the Supreme Court would have to recuse themselves since they were all elected by one party or another.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:28 pm to udtiger
Do we know yet if the case has been officially appealed to the federal courts yet? Surely the PA Republicans have already appealed it, right?
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:28 pm to udtiger
quote:
when I was reading the citations/authorities and saw the CNN poll, I LOL'd IRL
Same. I immediately stopped reading when I finished that paragraph.
frick off using some bullshite poll as authority on this. The respondents probably know frick all about the process and therefore their opinion is irrelevant.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:28 pm to udtiger
That motion is quoting newspaper editorial board opinion columns as evidence:
quote:
Editorial Board, Judge Barrett must recuse herself in any election case, Newark Star-Ledger, Oct. 18, 2020,
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:28 pm to udtiger
quote:
Pennsylvania election stealing Dems filed a Motion to Recuse her from the writ filed in response to the "signature match" ruling from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Deal. But also all the liberal judges have to recuse themselves from every abortion, gun control, free speech, hate speech, gender discrimination, and constitutional law case.
Sound good?
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:29 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Wolf
Low key worst governor in the country.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:30 pm to olemc999
Is it PA that allows ballots to be counted past election day?
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:30 pm to udtiger
quote:
the Pennsylvania Dems are nervous
Talk about role-reversal. In Pennsylvania it's usually the cows and sheep who are nervous of them.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:31 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
That motion is quoting newspaper editorial board opinion columns as evidence:
This is fricking embarrassing and I am a retard regarding the law.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:36 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Editorial Board, Judge Barrett must recuse herself in any election case, Newark Star-Ledger, Oct. 18, 2020,
I place much more value on the legal opinion of the woman who finished #1 in her class at Notre Frickin Dame Law School over any of those hacks
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:37 pm to udtiger
quote:
that the Pennsylvania election stealing Dems filed a Motion to Recuse her from the writ filed in response to the "signature match" ruling from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:38 pm to Scruffy
yea she doesn't have to recuse shite.
Pound sand filth
Pound sand filth
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:42 pm to jclem11
So Supreme Court business is now dictated by opinion polls?
Posted on 10/27/20 at 1:44 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
So Supreme Court business is now dictated by opinion polls?
only those pushing a certain agenda
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News