Started By
Message

re: "Above the Fray" libertarians who white knight for everything Biden...

Posted on 3/2/21 at 2:52 pm to
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
17598 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I continue to hold that the concepts you espouse (with which I largely agree) as being "natural" rights are SOCIETAL, rather than universal.



Well, it appears you and Thomas Jefferson have a point of disagreement then.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Well, it appears you and Thomas Jefferson have a point of disagreement then.
Jefferson is my favorite president.

He was a talented politician, who knew how to use rhetoric quite effectively and how to borrow from Locke ... even when the rhetoric was problematic if examined closely.

"All men are created equal" from a slave-owner would be just one example.

To be clear, I agree that the concepts in question are independent of any specific government. The only question is whether they are somehow hard-coded into the operating system of the universe, or whether they evolved in Western civilization ... even if they did NOT evolve elsewhere on the planet.

Take the Indian subcontinent as an example. Thousands of years of castes and Dravidian tradition mean that a "western-style democracy" would NEVER have emerged organically there, no matter HOW enthusiastically they have now embraced the concepts.
This post was edited on 3/2/21 at 3:12 pm
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21682 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

And again, natural laws exists independently of my values.


You're just repeating yourself without addressing anything I'm saying. I haven't disagreed with you on that point, so I'm not sure what repeating it accomplishes.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21682 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Even an anarchist is guilty of this, because HE wants "enforcement" of anarchist principles,


Hadn't thought of that but it's a valid point.

Everyone wants their values reflected in the law, even if it's in the lack of said law. Some people have such a vested interest in believing that it's only those "other guys" who do that it's difficult to explain otherwise.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Some people have such a vested interest in believing that it's only those "other guys" who do that it's difficult to explain otherwise.
Agreed.

I see it as a corollary of the need to demonize anyone who disagrees with oneself.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13314 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Alcohol is the very definition of a hard drug. Excessive alcohol use can harm every single organ in your body. Why don’t we bring back alcohol prohibition?


First, you are speaking to someone who has lived 42 of his 51 years in one of many of Arkansas’ dry counties.

Secondly, you are speaking to someone who grew up with a sister who is mentally retarded because some a-hole decided to drink and drive, which resulted in crushing her then two week old head, maiming her for life.

Third, you are speaking to someone who grew up with an abusive drunk father, and who has lost several friends, an uncle, an aunt, and a grandfather to alcohol.

So you are speaking to someone who believes a person should get at least 10 years in prison for first offense DUI. So don’t try throwing up bringing back prohibition to me, thinking I’m going to clutch my pearls. Bring it back.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

troyt37
Each of those tragedies is very sad. All of them combined are ... tragic. You have my sympathy and probably that of every person on this forum with even a milligram of empathy.

At the same time, it IS interesting to see how someone who is usually strident about limited government and related issues can abandon those principles when faced with an issue that carries personal emotional weight.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13314 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

At the same time, it IS interesting to see how someone who is usually strident about limited government and related issues can abandon those principles when faced with an issue that carries personal emotional weight.


You miss the point completely. It’s not that I don’t want limited government, it’s that I acknowledge that government has its legitimate purposes, and this is one of them.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

quote:

it IS interesting to see how someone who is usually strident about limited government and related issues can abandon those principles when faced with an issue that carries personal emotional weight.
I acknowledge that government has its legitimate purposes, and this is one of them.
The breadth of the "legitimate purposes" that one recognizes for government is directly related to the extent that one believes government should be "limited."

In this case, "abandon" was doubtless too strong a word, and I apologize. I should have said something like "apply those principles" instead.

Again, I fully understand the foundations for your position on this issue.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21682 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

At the same time, it IS interesting to see how someone who is usually strident about limited government and related issues


I have a libertarian bent but I'm also a pragmatist. Just to take one issue, in a vacuum I could not care less about gambling. In the real world if it proves to be a destructive enough force I can see the logic behind limiting or restricting it, especially when I'm asked to pick up the pieces with my income in the form of taxes. I don't care if pot is legalized but I don't want crack sold at CVS for the same reason. What's the benefit and what's the damage are questions worth asking IMO.
Posted by Pdubntrub
Member since Jan 2018
1779 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Ever take a gander at the “Faces of Meth” comparisons? Maybe you should, so you could know how embarrassed you should be for drawing an equivalence between sugar and caffeine, and hard drugs like meth, heroin, crack, etc.

It's not a coincidence that drugs became stronger with prohibition, It's actually the reason. Drugs will continue to more dangerous and stronger and we will continue to spend trillions fighting an unwinnable, immoral drug war. You can't support freedom and a war on drugs. Gment shouldn't have the power to protect you from yourself. I'll take liberty and drugs. You can have a "drug less society" with big brother taking care of you
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21682 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

I'll take liberty and drugs.


But that's not an option. You can have legalized drugs, but your liberty will be still be curtailed and you (assuming you're a net positive tax payer) will pay for the results of the legalized drugs.

In a vacuum I agree with you, but we don't live in a vacuum. We live in a big government world where you're going to buy little Timmy his lunch and his clothes when Timmy's mommy is zoned out in a crackhouse somewhere.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112410 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

Jefferson is my favorite president.


He's mine too just because he strikes me as the Renaissance Man who was learned in such a wide variety of subjects.
It's a shame that our recent presidents were just educated in law schools. Even some that graduated near the bottom of the Syracuse Law School which really sucks.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

I have a libertarian bent but I'm also a pragmatist.
I hear you.

Contrary to what a handful of posters keep saying, IDEOLOGICALLY I am a pretty hardcore libertarian. If you are not hurting anyone else, I DO NOT CARE what you do to yourself or with your property. BUT at the same time, I think you should receive ZERO governmental assistance with regard to situations YOU created. Get addicted to drugs? I would see you die in the streets before I gave you one cent of tax money.

At the same time, I realize that 99% of the populace is NOT REMOTELY as uncaring as I am about your personal poor decision-making. Cost-Benefit is as good a means of addressing these issues as any. Better than most.
Posted by Pdubntrub
Member since Jan 2018
1779 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

CVS for the same reason. What's the benefit

There's no need to by it in the street anymore, it becomes much safer to the addict and areas of cities aren't warzone.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

quote:

CVS for the same reason. What's the benefit
There's no need to by it in the street anymore, it becomes much safer to the addict and areas of cities aren't warzone.
Tobacco is legal, but there is still a heavy illegal trade in the product ... due to taxation.

How do we avoid a similar problem with legalizing controlled substances? Not tax them at all?
Posted by CedarChest
South of Mejico
Member since Jun 2020
2773 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

You mean like Hank that blasted Trump every chance and then white knights for a bumbling fool on everything, and pretends to be “independent” “conservative”, but always seems to be siding with liberal policy and agendas?

That's the George Will type. They fancy themselves as high-minded and above the fray. They live in a theoretical world that originated the moment they came out of that womb with a silver spoon in their mouth. Ditty bought 'im a place in the freshman class at Yale or one of their fru fru colleges like Amherst or Williams. They are always wanting to go to war but with Bubba the mechanic's kids, not theirs. Trump is the ultimate antidote to this perfumed scum; that's why they hate Trump and Trump supporters so much. MAGA
Posted by Pdubntrub
Member since Jan 2018
1779 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

How do we avoid a similar problem with legalizing controlled substances? Not tax them at all?

Gment shouldn't be involved in a trade between 2 consenting adults. So yea stop taxing.
Posted by ocelot4ark
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2009
12458 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 6:33 pm to
You sound like a liberal on reddit, which ALWAYS speak to libertarians just being closeted Republicans.

I think you're all just intolerant of other people holding different opinions. None of you seem tolerant of anything.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13314 posts
Posted on 3/2/21 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

Gment shouldn't have the power to protect you from yourself. I'll take liberty and drugs.


You’ll take more than that. You’ll take taxpayer funded treatment and recovery facilities. You’ll take higher insurance rates and higher crime rates. You’ll take taxpayer funded children’s facilities. You’ll take untold numbers of grandparents golden years from them, because they are trying and very often failing to raise their addicted children’s children. You’ll take public schools continuing to turn their back on attempting to educate kids, in favor of creating safe spaces for these kids who have none. You’ll take a more dangerous, violent, and lawless society. You’ll take having to rely on, maybe even trust your life to, some drug addled loser in your workplace.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram