Started By
Message
locked post

A Turtledove Story of South African History (possible Land Use Solution added on p.4)

Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:40 am
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:40 am
TLDNR: This post will summarize South African history by analogy to an alternate history of the southern United States.

The history of South Africa is not particularly well known to most Americans, but it can become easier to understand, if we draw a few analogies to American history. This post will be somewhat long, but I think it will be worth your time if you know little South African history and want to understand it better. Yes, I expect lots of TLDNR comments.

These analogies take the form of an alternate history of North America, in which the territory now comprising the Old Deep,South of the US will serve as an analogue for the Cape colony in southern Africa (the original core of modern South Africa).

Imagine for a moment that the American revolution had gone somewhat differently. In particular, imagine that the settled areas of eastern Canada (primarily southern Ontario and southern Quebec) had joined the Revolution and that the French Revolution had taken place a bit earlier, necessitating French withdrawal from any involvement in the American Revolution.

Now imagine that the southern colonies and the northern colonies (including Canada’s Maritime Provinces) each negotiated peace with Britain on two different terms. The North achieves complete independence from Great Britain (the Yankee States of America). The South achieves significant self-rule, but not full independence (the Confederated Southern Colony). Because the French are weakened by their own Revolution, Great Britain forces renunciation of any claim to greater Louisiana (the Louisiana purchase). The boundaries of the CSC are established as everything south of the Mason Dixon line and east of the Sabine River. The northern Louisiana Purchase goes to the Yankees, and the desert southwest (including Texas) remains part of New Spain.

From this point forward, Great Britain will play the role of the Dutch in our history, while the Yankees will play the role of England in our history.

For various reasons, the British wish to regain Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, while the Yankees wish to obtain control of the CSC coastlines to aid in trade with the Caribbean and New Spain. Therefore, Great Britain and the Yankees enter a treaty in the early 1800s exchanging those territories. The Deep South becomes a Yankee territory (without statehood), called the Confederated Southern Territory (the British Cape Colony)

The Yankees’ first action is to abolish slavery in the CST. Southern Whites (Dixievolk) do not like this new situation, especially the Southern White farmers and planters (the Dixieboers). The bulk of the Dixieboers promptly hitch their oxen and mules to their wagons, load their stuff and their slaves, and begin a mass migration/track westward, across the Sabine River ... thus out of CST territory and into sparsely-held territory of New Spain. Many other Dixievolk remain in the CST and accept Yankee rule. The vast majority (99%) of mixed-race residents (the Free Coloureds, who outnumber the Dixievolk) remain as well.

The Yankees send colonists to the CST, who settle alongside the remaining Dixievolk. The Dixievolk and the White Yankee colonists are still outnumbered by the mixed-race Free Coloureds.

The Dixieboers fight a series of conflicts against forces,of New Spain (analogue for the Bantu nations in southeastern Africa) for control of the lands now comprising Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and parts of northern Mexico. They win, and eventually establish the Texican Free State (Orange Free State) between the Sabine and the Pecos and the Transpecos (Transvaal) west of the Pecos, both as independent nations with full diplomatic recognition by the 1830s or so. In these new nations, the Dixieboers still own slaves, and free Latinos have few rights.

The Dixieboers discover vast reserves of petroleum in the Texican Free State and vast deposits of gold and diamonds in the Transpecos. The Yankees want to control these resources, so they invade and conquer both the Texican Free State and the Transpecos. The Yankees eventually combine these territories with the CST in the early 1900s to form the Union of Southern Territories (the UST, still without statehood) (Union of South Africa).

As successor to New Spain, Mexico (here, still equated to the Bantu nations) wants to regain the Transpecos and the Texican Free State, and the Yankees and the UST fight a series of wars with Mexico in the late 1800s to retain the Free State and especially the Transpecos. The Yankees and UST win these wars.

Since the arrival of the Dixieboers, Latinos have been filtering into the Transpecos and the Texican Free State from Mexico to serve as a labor pool. They eventually become the majority, but have few rights. Few migrate as far as the Deep South, where Free Coloreds remain the plurality.

UST troops help the Yankees fight in WW1, and a Southern Independence movement (led by Dixievolk) develops in the UST thereafter. Whites (dominated by the Dixievolk) pass laws that non-Whites cannot own land in 95% of the UST and impose a patchwork of Jaime Cuervo (Jim Crow) laws limiting other rights of all non-White races.

WW2 rolls around, and UST troops again assist the Yankees, but many Dixieboers secretly sympathize with Germany. After WW2: the Yankees grant independence to the UST, which renames itself the Republic of Southern America (the RSA, equivalent to the Republic of South Africa).

At this point, Southern Whites (Dixievolk and White Yankee colonist families) control the country despite being a small minority. The largest Dixievolk political party (the National Party) includes many of the volk who sympathized with the Germans in WW2. The National Party implements a codified set of formal laws and policies for the separation of Whites and non-Whites, which they call “Apartness”(apartheid). Among other things, the franchise is withheld from Amerinds, Blacks and Latinos (Khoisan, South asians and Bantu in South Africa). Mixed race Coloureds initially retain the franchise in the Old Deep South, but it is eventually (by the 1950s) taken from them as well.

In 1994, international pressure forces Whites in the RSA to grant the franchise and full citizenship to Blacks, Amerinds, Latinos and mixed race Coloureds. Whites are promptly voted out of power.
This post was edited on 8/27/18 at 12:04 pm
Posted by TigerBait1971
PTC GA
Member since Oct 2014
14865 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:41 am to
Nobody is going to read all that crap.
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9417 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:46 am to
Your intellect is wasted on the simpletons here (see above.)
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:46 am to
quote:

Nobody is going to read all that crap.
Exactly the response I expect from 95% of posters. Five percent may want to learn something.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:49 am to
quote:

Exactly the response I expect from 95% of posters. Five percent may want to learn something


Oh, I learned something.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123940 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:50 am to
Reads like a bad version the Hobbit.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Your intellect is wasted on the simpletons here (see above.)



frick you
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111529 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:51 am to
You’d been better off dropping the analogy garbage.
This post was edited on 8/27/18 at 7:51 am
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:52 am to
Where's the part justifying white genocide?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123940 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:54 am to
quote:

imagine that the southern colonies and the northern colonies (including Canada’s Maritime Provinces) each negotiated peace with Britain on two different terms. The North achieves complete independence from Great Britain (the Yankee States of America). The South achieves significant self-rule, but not full independence (the Confederated Southern Colony). Because the French are weakened by their own Revolution, Great Britain forces renunciation of any claim to greater Louisiana (the Louisiana purchase). The boundaries of the CSC are established as everything south of the Mason Dixon line and east of the Sabine River. The northern Louisiana Purchase goes to the Yankees, and the desert southwest (including Texas) remains part of New Spain.

From this point forward, Great Britain will play the role of the Dutch in our history, while the Yankees will play the role of England in our history.

For various reasons, the British wish to regain Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, while the Yankees wish to obtain control of the CSC coastlines to aid in trade with the Caribbean and New Spain.
quote:

Your intellect is wasted
"Wasted" is a good way to put it......
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42608 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Exactly the response I expect from 95% of posters. Five percent may want to learn something.


I read - and re-read - the OP and my head is still spinning. It would take a ton more concentration and applied effort to really make sense of the correlations you posit - and I am just not up to it.

I admire the effort tho, and enjoy this kind of input to the board. The fault is my own limitations in understanding.

Do not be dissuaded by the tl:dr whimpers - lots of people on here like to discuss important topics with bumper sticker slogans.

Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 7:59 am to
quote:


Exactly the response I expect from 95% of posters. Five percent may want to learn something.


but you're not really teaching them anything, you've created an amalgamation of two different histories, one that you've made up and have convoluted the whole thing...
This post was edited on 8/27/18 at 8:01 am
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Where's the part justifying white genocide?
Nothing would justify genocide.

My goal was simply to make the history of South Africa more accessible, by using names, players and places more familiar to an American audience.
This post was edited on 8/27/18 at 9:27 am
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29793 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 8:02 am to
Nothing says "confirmation bias" like using our own history (and all it's baggaged biases) to try and justify the history of a region half a world away.


Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111529 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 8:02 am to
quote:

The fault is my own limitations in understanding.


It’s not. That was a huddled mass of warmed over garbage.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45769 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 8:03 am to
Like to discuss topics, not made up correlations that are pulled out of someone's arse.

Obligatory tl;dr
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123940 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Where's the part justifying white genocide?
That's where you need to imagine the British are actually Dutch, but substitute Hitler for Churchill, except where Hitler was for Socialism, imagine that Socialism part didn't happen. Then imagine Churchill decided the Northern Irish needed to be converted to Judaism, and forced to immigrate to Germany where they could be exterminated. Though the Dutch, who were actually British, objected they were overrun by Churchill's Germans, and we all love Churchill. So that's how . . .
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98843 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 8:07 am to
You left something out.

quote:

Starting in 1995, and accelerating in the 2000s, the RSA turns to utter shite.
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 8:08 am to
quote:


Where's the part justifying white genocide?



Well, that's what's happening, I see your made up story ends with the whitey getting voted out, seems like being extinguished would be a more significant end point, no?

edit:question directed to OP...
This post was edited on 8/27/18 at 8:10 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260610 posts
Posted on 8/27/18 at 8:09 am to
quote:

You’d been better off dropping the analogy garbage.



Yep, ruined the whole thing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram