Started By
Message

re: A return to their ancient homeland? Nonsense.

Posted on 8/3/14 at 5:46 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
67749 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

At least one prominent geneticist at Johns Hopkins says otherwise.

Also, historically, it would have been physically, biologically impossible for the few thousand Jews who were expelled from Palestine in the seventh century to grow into the millions of European Jews in the twentieth.

Whether the Jews who moved to establish in Israel in 1948 were Khazars or not they most certainly were not of primarily Hebraic descent.


1. There are a great number of other researchers published in various Genetics Journals who found otherwise.

2. Apparently it is impossible for a few thousand jews to become millions in 1500 years, but completely possible for a few thousand Khazar aristocrats to become millions of jews.

3. You base that last statement on what?
This post was edited on 8/3/14 at 6:01 pm
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

The Jewish state was carved from lands occupied by Palestinians because there was a serious Jewish repatriation problem in Europe, and those Jews could not have taken Israel without American and British mandates, money, and armed support.
The Arabs wouldn't have a mosque on the site of the Jewish temple in Jerusalem if the Romans hadn't conquered the city, destroyed the Jewish temple and displaced the Jewish inhabitants. But they did.

From FY1949-1958 the United States provided Israel with zero military assistance. From FY 1959-1973 the only military assistance the United States provided Israel was loans to purchase military equipment. It is only since FY 1974 that the United States has provided Israel with direct military assistance. And the assistance was due to the fact that Israel was attacked by several Soviet client countries in 1973. It was Cold War motives that led to American support for Israel rather than any sort of Jewish influence on American policies.
Posted by Porky
Member since Aug 2008
19103 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

It is only since FY 1974 that the United States has provided Israel with direct military assistance. And the assistance was due to the fact that Israel was attacked by several Soviet client countries in 1973. It was Cold War motives that led to American support for Israel rather than any sort of Jewish influence on American policies.

America's role in the Vietnam War was winding down during this time and the demand for military hardware was taking a hit so what better way is there to increase the demand than to convince Congress that Israel needs U.S. weapons to survive? U.S. taxpayers pay the bill. Members of Congress accept legal bribes from lobbyists like prostitutes. Israel is happy. Military contractors are happy and most U.S. taxpayers are oblivious due to the distractions coming from Watergate and the last days before the fall of Saigon.

That's the general scenario.
This post was edited on 8/3/14 at 7:50 pm
Posted by roygu
Member since Jan 2004
11718 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

ETA, the Indians once owned America.


How do we know who actually owned any portion of earth from the beginning of man?

Remember when the bones, suspected of being of caucasian descent, were found on an indian reservation. There was some evicence they may have predated the first known native Amercians. The Indians sued, Bill Clinton dallied, bones disappeared. Finally it was decided that PC superseded science. The bones were turned over to the tribe who immediately destroyed them. ;)
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36534 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 8:47 pm to
Duck a direct question OK.

Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40255 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 8:51 pm to
no they kick the muslims arse multiple times in the last 60+ years and won their homeland.

Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 9:15 pm to
What a waste of skin
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18186 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

At least one prominent geneticist at Johns Hopkins says otherwise.


So consensus is not applicable in this situation.
Posted by LSUgusto
Member since May 2005
19227 posts
Posted on 8/4/14 at 7:11 pm to
Rex, I've spent the last couple of days reading up about the Khazarian empire. Truly fascinating chapter in history to read about.

But, while the Khazarians may have ultimately interspersed with the descendant Hebrews that dispersed out of Isreal across Europe, Asia and Russia, I find little evidence to suggest that they constituted enough of a contribution to disregard the Semetic lineage of the Jews that resettled modern Israel in the 20th Century.

Very interesting to learn about, though.
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 8/4/14 at 9:11 pm to
Sounds like this forum has been invaded by 88's.

LC
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 10Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram