Started By
Message

re: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Rules mRNA COVID-19 Jab is NOT a Vaccine

Posted on 6/9/24 at 8:22 am to
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
100658 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 8:22 am to
quote:

That’s ridiculous on the face of it. Real science moves slowly.


This. Amazes me how professionals completely ignored the common scientific method in regards to Covid shots. You know the method everyone learns about in 2nd grade that is the basis for any and all scientific research and findings
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135710 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Traditional vaccines give you an inactive dose of the actual virus
Right. Traditionally they're live attenuated, or killed. There is little immunological difference between killed, particulated antigens and mRNA vax produced antigens. Eventually, mRNA technology will predominate vax production.

The current difference is a killed vax exposes patients to a far wider range of viral antigen than, for example, a single reduced segment of particular s-protein produced by the mRNA vax. Whereas the former entails more side-effect potential, it is also more immunogenic, i.e., effective.

So while saying the mRNA vax is "not a vaccine" is uninformed, noting that mRNA CV19 vax iterations, especially the recent ones, are ineffective is simple fact.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125557 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 9:07 am to
If a vaccine doesn’t work, is it a vaccine?
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56127 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 10:33 am to
quote:

that's every viral vaccine. you still get the virus. that's a stupid why of defining anything.


Uh, polio vaccine says "hold my beer while I enlighten you".

quote:

Two doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) are 90% effective or more against paralytic polio; three doses are 99% to 100% effective
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135710 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 11:03 am to
quote:

If a vaccine doesn’t work, is it a vaccine?
Believe it or not, yes.

E.g., We guess at seasonal flu strains and put out the annual flu vax anticipating our guess to be correct. Sometimes it is, and the flu vax is quite effective. Sometimes we are surprised, and the vax is ineffective. The latter is also a component to the CV19 vax ineffectiveness, as new variants arise more quickly than we can develop a new vax.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37149 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Sometimes we are surprised, and the vax is ineffective.
I know they missed rather badly a few years ago. However, although ineffective against what turned out to be the predominate strain, it still would have been effective against the strain that it was developed to fight, right? So, still a vaccine.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37149 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Sometimes we are surprised, and the vax is ineffective.
I know they missed rather badly a few years ago. However, although ineffective against what turned out to be the predominate strain, it still would have been effective against the strain that it was developed to fight, right? So, still a vaccine.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57977 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Them saying natural immunity wasn’t a thing with Covid was the first flaming red flag for me with this “vax.”


For me, it was the speed with which they crafted it.

The normal timeframe for a new medicine's testing is ~10 years, animal testing alone usually lasts at least a year. For fast-tracked medicines, the testing time is cut down greatly, but it's still something like 3-5 years of testing before it's approved for widespread use.

This concoction went from being created in February 2020 to beginning being mass-distributed by January 2021. Anyone not skeptical about that was ruled by their fear, had no fricking clue about the history of rushed drugs (thalidomide, swine flu vax in 76, etc) -nor wished to know about it-, is the type of person who knee-jerks falls for the "new is better" philosophy to the point of wearing blinders to prevent objective criticisms (see also: EVs), or some combination thereof.

It had nothing to do with right/left, but knowing that quick creation is, more often than not, rife with carelessness. It had to do with the science of understanding that you need to fully vet something before you begin demanding people inject themselves with it and that takes time.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43372 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 11:31 am to
You can read any COVID vaccine thread on any board on any day and come to realize quickly who trusted the government and who has the clot shot running through their veins!



Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt!

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125557 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Believe it or not, yes.


I believe this is a bug of our approval process for vaccines. Not a feature.

A vaccine that isn’t effective in stopping transmission shouldn’t be approved. Our approval process is corrupted. And an unapproved vaccine has the form of a vaccine, but denies the power thereof.
Posted by Craig86
Florida
Member since Oct 2012
1945 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 11:50 am to
So when is everyone gonna die? Soon? How long this gonna take. Inflation killing me gimme a clot shot.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135710 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

it still would have been effective against the strain that it was developed to fight, right? So, still a vaccine.
and in fairness, that's what's going on with the recent less virulent, more transmissible CV19 strains.

The newest vax is developed to target what is anticipated to be the next endemic CV19 strain. But at the conclusion of the six-month period required to deploy the new vax version, the strain it is targeting has peaked and is well on the way to disappearing.

With a static, less mutable virus, the CV19 vax would be more effective.

But to be clear, if one is vaxxed, and if the strain is the one targeted by the vax, and if exposure is to a non-overwhelming viral count, the vaxxed person will avoid infection whereas a CV19 naive person would get infected.

This post was edited on 6/9/24 at 12:04 pm
Posted by BlueMoonOfKentucky
Member since Feb 2024
278 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 12:05 pm to
I'm shocked that the 9th circuit court came out with this ruling.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135710 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

A vaccine that isn’t effective in stopping transmission
Initially the CV19 vax was effective in reducing transmission, and severity of infection, if transmitted. When CV19 was more virulent, those effects were important. Now? Not so much.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75360 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

So when is everyone gonna die? Soon?


Reminder for the Tennessee fans: If COVID-19 were the extinction level event that your television earnestly swore to you that it was, there would've been flatbed trucks going around every town in the country picking up the bodies of the homeless, as they would've been incredibly susceptible, and likely have compromised immune systems.

They did not.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37149 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

With a static, less mutable virus, the CV19 vax would be more effective.

In my feeble brain, I think this is what happened with me. In the lead up to the vaccines, I had already lost 3 friends to covid and they were younger and at least at healthy or healthier than I was. So, Jan and Feb, 2021, I was a willing patient that took the 2 shots. I did not get covid and probably was around it a good bit. I refused boosters but in June, 2022, I got what I assume was the Omicron variant. Sicker than spit for several days. But I assume the shots I took 18 months earlier were end of life or little to no effect on the variant. My wife got it several months later and she was hardly sick at all. Low grade fever for a couple of days were worst symptoms.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram