- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:15 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I’m under the impression that Obama allowed claims of Russian election interference to be claimed in the two months he was president after the election. Because Obama did not tell people to hush about Russia, Trump was sworn in on January 20, 2017. And now, years later, people are saying Obama committed treason and staged a coup.
Even though Trump was sworn in on January 20, 2017. But I’m the emotional Karen.
Nobody is this dumb. It’s just impossible.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:16 am to 4cubbies
>This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 8:17 am
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:16 am to moneyg
Another person responding with “nuh uh lol you’re dumb” while refusing to state anything relevant.
You obviously know less about this than I do.
You obviously know less about this than I do.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:17 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Feel free to post the real story.
Here you go, cupcake:
Gabbard asserts that after Trump’s 2016 election win against Hillary Clinton, Obama and his national security team deliberately manipulated intelligence to create a narrative that Russia interfered in the election to favor Trump. She describes this as a “years-long coup” aimed at subverting the will of the American people and undermining Trump’s presidency.
She claims this effort was not about protecting national security but about delegitimizing Trump’s election, posing an “existential threat” to American democracy.
According to Gabbard, prior to the 2016 election, the Intelligence Community (IC) consistently assessed that Russia was “probably not trying … to influence the election by using cyber means.” A December 7, 2016, memo for then-DNI James Clapper stated, “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.”
However, Gabbard alleges that after a National Security Council (NSC) meeting on December 9, 2016, attended by Obama and senior officials like James Clapper (DNI), John Brennan (CIA Director), Susan Rice (National Security Adviser), John Kerry (Secretary of State), Loretta Lynch (Attorney General), and Andrew McCabe (FBI Deputy Director), a new IC assessment was ordered at Obama’s request. This assessment, released on January 6, 2017, claimed Russia intervened to aid Trump, contradicting earlier findings.
Gabbard claims this revised assessment relied on unreliable or fabricated sources, notably the Steele dossier, which contained unverified allegations of Russian kompromat on Trump. She argues that this dossier and other “manufactured intelligence” fueled the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, leading to the Mueller investigation, two impeachments, arrests of Trump associates, and heightened U.S.-Russia tensions.
On July 18, 2025, Gabbard released 114 pages of declassified documents, including emails and memos, which she describes as “overwhelming evidence” of the conspiracy. These documents reportedly show communications among Obama administration officials about Russia’s role in the 2016 election.
One highlighted document is an email from Clapper’s assistant, noting Obama’s request for a new assessment of “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.” Gabbard argues this directive led to a politicized report that ignored prior IC conclusions.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:20 am to ibldprplgld
This is a wordier version of what I posted. Obama let people claim Russia interfered with the 2016 election during the two months Obama was president after the election.
Because Obama let people say this, Trump was sworn in on Jan 20, 2017.
What a coup!
Because Obama let people say this, Trump was sworn in on Jan 20, 2017.
What a coup!
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:22 am to LSU Patrick
When have I ever posted praise or support for Obama?
Posting here is truly like entering an alternate universe.
Posting here is truly like entering an alternate universe.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:24 am to 4cubbies
Based on your posts over the years, you support everything the wacko, corrupt left does. Why not just own it?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:25 am to 4cubbies
quote:
This is a wordier version of what I posted. Obama let people claim Russia interfered with the 2016 election during the two months Obama was president after the election.
Because Obama let people say this, Trump was sworn in on Jan 20, 2017.
What a coup!
Furthermore the trump admin went on to indict 11 Russian military officers who breached election systems during the election....
LINK
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 10:21 am
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:29 am to 4cubbies
SFP must be your mentor. People hear what you post and add it to the whole and your biggest comeback is ‘where did I ever say that’, your husband has to be insane.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:29 am to 4cubbies
quote:
This is a wordier version of what I posted. Obama let people claim Russia interfered with the 2016 election during the two months Obama was president after the election.
Because Obama let people say this, Trump was sworn in on Jan 20, 2017.
What a coup!
The dims claim that Jan6 was an insurrection to overthrow the gov and leave Trump in power. None of that happened. Biden was still sworn in. What an insurrection!
Yet, people still went to jail. So yeah, we would also like to see people go to jail for this attempted coup.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:30 am to udtiger
quote:Noted, it also wasn't mentioned on ANY of the Sunday morning news shows, including FOX News Sunday.
As of yesterday morning, it wasn't even mentioned on the websites of:
ABC
CBS
NBC
CNN
MSNBC
NYT
WAPO
WSJ
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:31 am to VoxDawg
quote:In the most painful way possible.
Kill that messenger...
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:32 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
Based on your posts over the years, you support everything the wacko, corrupt left does.
I’ve literally never posted anything supporting Obama. Link one of these “posts over the years” that “support everything the wacko, corrupt left does,”
I don’t care about illegal immigration. I believe the focus on it is just an attempt to expand the police state and further infringe upon on rights.
I am strongly in favor of overhauling the penal system in the USA to focus on rehabilitation instead of exclusively punishment. Neither party cares about that.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:33 am to 4cubbies
quote:
This is a wordier version of what I posted. Obama let people claim Russia interfered with the 2016 election during the two months Obama was president after the election.
That’s actually not at all what Gabbard is saying. Do you ever get anything right?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day, but you’re a perfect .000
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:33 am to 4cubbies
quote:And you smell like cat urine.
Am I supposed to be upset that strangers are calling me fat on the internet?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:34 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:
The dims claim that Jan6 was an insurrection to overthrow the gov and leave Trump in power. None of that happened. Biden was still sworn in. What an insurrection!
I’ve never claimed J6 was an insurrection. I support everyone’s right to protest whatever they want.
quote:
Yet, people still went to jail. So yeah, we would also like to see people go to jail for this attempted coup.
You don’t know what a coup is. Who exactly do you want to see arrested, and for breaking what law?
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 8:36 am
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:35 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Obama let people claim Russia interfered with the 2016 election
So you admit his team manipulated intelligence. And you admit they used that evidence. And you admit that Obama knew.
No backing off that now.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:36 am to Neutral Underground
This shouldn't surprise anyone. We've known forever that democrats are duplicitous, power-hungry patricians who aim to organize our lives for us. They aren't moored by principles or even a semi-consistent set of ideas. The party ranges from midwestern moderates to foreign born Islamic socialists, but in the end, they all march to the same drum. But don't just take my word for it. Look at how they've consistently supported Biden through the Hunter debacle, or the Clintons after all of the stuff they've been caught doing. Look at how comfortable they were lying to us about Biden's mush brain or Kamala's rambling incompetence. Look at how they yawn and shrug at Swalwell's honeypot, Nancy's insider trading, Schiff's mortgage fraud, Fanni's affairs, etc...
Gaining power, by any means necessary, is ALL that matters.
Meanwhile, republicans turn on their own while they are winning, over something as retarded as the Epstein files.
Gaining power, by any means necessary, is ALL that matters.
Meanwhile, republicans turn on their own while they are winning, over something as retarded as the Epstein files.
Popular
Back to top


4








