re: 3 questions about Trump J6 case that don't make sense

quote:

---

with that judge,

---

Imo the Judge won’t make it to the trial. She will have to recuse herself due to ties to certain law firms. Only after she continues to tie up certain details getting out and play more election interference

quote:

---

seditious conspiracy

---

You are literally insane.

quote:

---

One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened,” Brann added. “Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence.”

---

same as we have seen in dozens of trumpy kracken nonsense claims.
my favourite from some captain in arizona:
"its impossible."
td posters reposted that for a week even after it was debunked.

You have to type it in a way he understands

Your
the number one
poster on this board when
it comes to nonsense
claims.

I perfectly understand people making the argument of “it isn’t what you know, but what you can prove”. It bothers me when people can’t just admit they are happy they are getting away with it and instead act like the system/government is not obviously corrupt about certain things.

From the Time article...

quote:

---

In August and September, it sent ballot applications to 15 million people in key states, 4.6 million of whom returned them. In mailings and digital ads, the group urged people not to wait for Election Day.

---

Who did they really send the ballots to? It would be fair if they did this in every state. Instead, this mostly liberal group did this in the key states they thought they needed to win the election for Biden. Did they send them to every voter in the state? Or did they only send ballots to registered democratic voters in key areas?

I don't know the answers to these questions. But if they only sent them to dems or they (admittedly) sent them only in "key" states, they legally sort of stole the election. I personally have thought all along this is how they beat Trump. I just thought it was all the DNC and the Biden campaign. Trump's own campaign and the RNC failed to look to non-traditional means during the pandemic to get voters who normally don't vote (the ones he got in 2016) to all turn out, while this effort got all the democratic ones who didn't turn out in 2016 to cast mail in votes.

quote:

---

Personally, never saw a candidate coerce the VP into violating the constitution, or coerce and threaten state elected officials to change votes as we know he did in AZ and GA or conspire with multiple states to submit forged slate of electors.

---

Notwithstanding your description of events matching exactly what the prosecutor is claiming (with no evidence to support it to date), most of this stuff is lightly reported and described as standard election contestation tactics. Clinton sent fake electors to states, Gore availed himself of pretty much every tactic in 2000. The part about the VP is unique since there aren't many examples of a sitting president contesting the election for his second term, but strategizing a plan with your cabinet is not as insidious as you and Smith are making it out to be.

quote:

---

You have to type it in a way he understands

---

quote:

---

with no evidence to support it to date)

---

Not my job to provide evidence. That’s Smith’s job and since the DOJ’s conviction rate in court trials is over 99%, I feel he probably has some evidence. Have always heard the DOJ doesn’t bring a case to court they aren’t pretty sure they are going to win.