- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3/24/25 1:30PM *LIVE Oral Arguments Judges Henderson, Millett, Walker-Tren de Aragua
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:04 pm to udtiger
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:04 pm to udtiger
quote:Is Millet speaking now in circles and cutting off the guy?
Judge Karen Henderson
Henderson has been on the appeals court for more than 30 years. She was first appointed by former President George H.W. Bush in 1990.
Judge Patricia Millett
Millett was appointed to the appeals court in 2013 by former President Barack Obama.
Judge Justin Walker
Walker is the only judge on the panel appointed by Trump, who named him to the appeals court in 2020. Before Walker's appointment to the D.C. appeals court, Trump appointed him to the District Court for the Western District of Kentucky in 2019. Walker served on that court for just under a year before being confirmed to the appeals court.
0
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:06 pm to cajunangelle
This dumb judge is talking about time that someone might decide to file something. So now, we all need to give time? How much time bitch? There is no time requirement! Lets just make shite up
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:07 pm to cajunangelle
lol at this gov attorney fumbling and refusing to answer questions about the time the planes left (it’s public information).
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:08 pm to Decatur
quote:
lol at this gov attorney fumbling and refusing to answer questions about the time the planes left (it’s public information).
The stupid Judge is all over the place. She is just flat wrong and making up some time requirement.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:08 pm to TurkeyBaconLeg
Why is the judge not aware ICE will determine if they are gang members. If they deny they are gang members. ICE does do due process.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:10 pm to cajunangelle
This bitch is stupid as frick.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:11 pm to TurkeyBaconLeg
No, no one could have picked this stupid judge up to send her to a foreign jail.
This judge is a flake.
This judge is a flake.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:12 pm to TigerNAtux
She had a predetermined outcome.
She is making up scenario that does not even apply to this.
She is making up scenario that does not even apply to this.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:12 pm to TigerNAtux
She is repetitive and giggly then a super bitch.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:21 pm to cajunangelle
He disagrees on 3 reasons... and she does not allow him to state the 3 reasons
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:24 pm to Jjdoc
She has contradicted herself several times.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:31 pm to Jjdoc
Well 2 judges are being quiet.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:31 pm to Jjdoc
Throwing shite at the wall.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:34 pm to TigerNAtux
That's what they do when they have no clue.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:34 pm to TigerNAtux
She is horrible. whoever she is.
the ACLU is up. he is putting something to bed ya'll.
the ACLU is up. he is putting something to bed ya'll.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:36 pm to cajunangelle
And she is quiet as a mouse!!
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:37 pm to TigerNAtux
My Wife, a Corporate Attorney, is listening to this and about to pull her hair out. Throwing shite against the wall is exactly what she said. Law School Moot Court.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:38 pm to Houag80
The male Judge: it could have been filed in TX.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:44 pm to cajunangelle
Yes. He is hammering the fact that it's the wrong court.
ACLU is saying nope.
ACLU is saying nope.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:44 pm to cajunangelle
cajunangelle:
Can you help me out here?
From my understanding what I'm hearing from the lady judge is that she is stating these people have a right to be proven that they're actually part of the gang in question and that wasn't done?
I believe the Trump lawyer is stating that the first judges ruling didn't rule that was the his reasoning behind it. The lawyer's argument is that the judge ruling undermines the presidents power to do what he did.
I know that's a dumb mans interpretation of what's going on but am I in the ball park of what's going on? Also it's obvious to me that Trump didn't want to deport innocent people.
Can you help me out here?
From my understanding what I'm hearing from the lady judge is that she is stating these people have a right to be proven that they're actually part of the gang in question and that wasn't done?
I believe the Trump lawyer is stating that the first judges ruling didn't rule that was the his reasoning behind it. The lawyer's argument is that the judge ruling undermines the presidents power to do what he did.
I know that's a dumb mans interpretation of what's going on but am I in the ball park of what's going on? Also it's obvious to me that Trump didn't want to deport innocent people.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News