- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:06 pm to V Bainbridge
And yet the blue run states say it is racist to clean/purge their voter rolls. This is the type of proof that needs to shut down this BS argument once and for all. Same with the minorities cannot get IDs, yet they want them vaxxed and having a vax card? BS.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:09 pm to epbart
quote:
I often see people criticize Gateway Pundit here as if their reporting is problematic. But I've probably seen more instances of articles in the NY Times, CNN, etc. needing to publish corrections / retractions than GP.
The problem with the gateway pundit is they often post sensational stories that can only be found there. If something is true and interesting it will get picked up by other outlets that will corroborate the story.
I wouldn't trust anything on there until I see it come up somewhere else that isn't a complete hack site.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:12 pm to Tmcgin
quote:Don't forget to swallow. Your fellow soy boys enjoy that, I'm told.
Gateway pundit always checks out
Don't forget to use the code for Mypillow and Alex Jones Vitamins discount also
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:16 pm to Jjdoc
We love our many thousands of 121- 140 year olds, dont we?!!
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:20 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
Gateway pundit always checks out
Don't forget to use the code for Mypillow and Alex Jones Vitamins discount also
The opportunity for fraud is there because of poor controls and the rationalization to commit fraud is there because OMB.
Denying fraud at this point just makes you a fricking moron.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:20 pm to Powerman
quote:
wouldn't trust anything on there until I see it come up somewhere else that isn't a complete hack site.
Like NYT or WaPo?
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:22 pm to V Bainbridge
I am not saying there is something with the year 1918 but I know there is an auto year assigned to protect abused people or something along those lines because of the public information.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:41 pm to the808bass
quote:
It is often problematic. Not really worse than the leftist sites. And it’s more open about its bias. So not the end of the world.
Somewhat fair criticism. The part I bolded, though, already distinguishes it from CNN, NYT, etc., who pretend to not be biased. Your post made me actually go to the GP site to see if they are honest in their bias, and you are correct... From the subtitle on the top of the page under Gateway Pundit, citing that they "leave the Russia-Collusion fairy tale to the Conspiracy media" to their "About" page, which openly states:
quote:
Founded as a counter to the establishment media that primarily shares news and opinion from a decidedly liberal perspective, TGP we believe it is important that we are transparent about our beliefs and perspectives and how it may shape our news and opinion priorities. Our focus is to make editorial choices that address the gap in the politically liberal leanings of establishment media outlets.
To my eyes, this honesty about who they are separates them from mainstream media who starts at a dishonest position of feigned objectivity.
I never read GP outside of when links are posted here, and somewhat dislike their sensationalist, nearly click bait style... That being said, every time I do read an article from them, I don't find any glaring issues with the content (in contrast to msm).
Back to the topic of the OP, I again find the reporting accurate: A group, Wisconsin HOT, contacted election officials about 23k voters w/same phone #, and 8k with a registration year of 1918 in one county. And those officials have not responded.
I don't like the formatting of the article, but it's legit reporting of a problem that can undermine fair elections (and has arguably done so). This deserves a somewhat large headline and deserves answers, no?
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:50 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
If your election system makes fraud easy to do,
there will be fraud.
If there are democrats involved in your election
there will be fraud.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:53 pm to alphaandomega
Milwaukee had a police division dedicated to voter fraud because it was such an issue. Democrats got tired of the investigations and just ended the department.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:58 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Posted on 9/24/21 at 1:58 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
Gateway pundit always checks out
GWP is just sourcing the Telegram link from the group that discovered the glaring irregularity, you inspid jizz rag.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 2:02 pm to Powerman
quote:
The problem with the gateway pundit is they often post sensational stories that can only be found there. If something is true and interesting it will get picked up by other outlets that will corroborate the story.
I agree it can appear sensationalist as I said in my last post, which is after your reply. I highly disagree with the bold part. The Hunter Biden laptop / corruption news, for instance-- and the emails are continuing to trickle out-- was highly ignored by MSM during the election, except by them straining to frame it as, "Well, here's a questionable story being pushed by right wing fringe media that we aren't in a position to say is true." That is objectively bad reporting, and it's not covering the story, period.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 2:03 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
1918... by Tmcgin
Gateway pundit always checks out
Don't forget to use the code for Mypillow and Alex Jones Vitamins discount also
Found the useful idiot
Posted on 9/24/21 at 2:04 pm to epbart
quote:
That is objectively bad reporting, and it's not covering the story, period.
In an age where distrust of legacy media is at an all-time low, no less.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 2:04 pm to TS1926
quote:
Like NYT or WaPo?
No but if people like Breitbart aren't even picking it up and running with it that might tell you something.
Back to top

1










