- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2020 election fraud question
Posted on 9/5/23 at 7:42 pm to texridder
Posted on 9/5/23 at 7:42 pm to texridder
quote:Irrelevant. Counting occurred with no observers present. Even if you think it was unintentional, it's against procedure and invites the accusation of fraud. Couple that with Ruby Freeman's 911 call and there's a SERIOUS problem that has been covered up by local and state officials.
The video proves they left after the workers left. No one kicked them out. Prove it.
quote:Disingenuous. They had been opened, counted and then RESEALED according to Ruby Freeman's own testimony. Then opened again, COUNTED AGAIN and resealed again. There's no way you don't think that's illegal.
Because the ballots in the boxes under the table had already been opened by the workers who left and whose job it was to open then.
quote:According to Ruby Freeman, you are wrong. She was there. She was the one who REOPENED them, RECOUNTED them and resealed them. Why hasn't Ruby's own daughter denied this?
They went to the under the table ballots because those ballots had already been opened by the cutters before they left since it was their job to open the ballots.
Still no answer to the OP
0
Posted on 9/5/23 at 7:50 pm to Damone
quote:So you apparently missed the 2 long lists I cited. Care to break them down point by point?
Damone
Of course not. But you'll certainly type substantive posts like
quote:Well THAT settles it.
Yikes
No answer to the OP
Posted on 9/5/23 at 8:40 pm to TheQuestion
15 pages and no one has come close to proving Biden got 81 mil votes. There have been a couple of anemic attempts that merely explained how the election process works. So basically, some people just believe he got those votes because the govt said so.
Posted on 9/5/23 at 8:45 pm to TheQuestion
Ballots =/= votes
Posted on 9/5/23 at 9:24 pm to TheQuestion
quote:
Why do you believe biden got 81 million votes?
Because of the various checks and balances along the different state election processes.
quote:
Can you produce the evidence or do you just blithely believe the government?
I'm not sure If you know how an election works but evidence was created and collected and then approved by multiple levels
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 9/5/23 at 10:54 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Because of the various checks and balances along the different state election processes
That's a good one. Do those "checks and balances" include Maricopa co for MONTHS defying a judge's orders for transparency? What about counting votes with no observers present which happened at least in Georgia, if not other states as well? Are state-run, not-transparent "recounts" of already problematic votes part of the process? What about election machines being connected to the internet despite us being told it was impossible? What about mules running around stuffing ballot boxes? What about ballot harvesting? What about states allowing mail in voting despite it being not legal? What about election officials droning on and on about no fraud despite Ruby Freeman addmitting they scanned already counted ballots which, BTW, is corroborated by the video evidence? What about rampant chain of custody problems in the ongoing VoterGA case? Has anyone bothered to do anything about the findings of the Cyber Ninja audit? Believing there are "checks and balances" is incredibly naive
quote:I'm not sure if you're aware but the "evidence" you are referring to has been shown to be highly highly problematic, suspicious and even illegal. And when you say "approved," are you referring to the 2 states' supreme courts that ruled mail in ballots were illegal? You know, the ballots that primarily got Biden elected?
I'm not sure If you know how an election works but evidence was created and collected and then approved by multiple levels
Posted on 9/5/23 at 11:04 pm to TheQuestion
quote:
I'm not sure if you're aware but the "evidence" you are referring to has been shown to be highly highly problematic, suspicious and even illegal. And when you say "approved," are you referring to the 2 states' supreme courts that ruled mail in ballots were illegal? You know, the ballots that primarily got Biden elected?
The most glaring proof of election fraud was the near complete rejection by the various swing state courts to allow unfettered scrutiny of the mail in ballots and drop box ballots for chain of custody verification. Even when Lake's legal team in Maricopa county got the court to to agree with some ballot examination they were given just a few thousand pre-screened ballots and even some of those had very suspicious signatures that didn't match signatures on file.
This post was edited on 9/6/23 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 9/5/23 at 11:12 pm to TheQuestion
quote:
That's a good one. Do those "checks and balances" include Maricopa co for MONTHS defying a judge's orders for transparency?
Yes there was oversight of the election. And yes the county election board could have been more cooperative. And yes they did end up cooperating.
quote:
Has anyone bothered to do anything about the findings of the Cyber Ninja audit?
No because they were trash....they didn't submit anything of substance. Did cyber ninja ever actually produce everything they committed too or is their penalty still accruing?? I believe they are now defunct, like most scams they eventually packed up and went away.
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 9/5/23 at 11:30 pm to oklahogjr
quote:I don't doubt that there was SOME in SOME PLACES. But there very clearly wasn't in other places.
Yes there was oversight of the election
quote:
And yes the county election board could have been more cooperative
THIS is how you describe what happened? They blatantly defied a judge's orders for MONTHS. And when they finally complied, they didn't comply fully. If you can't acknowledge the criminality of that, you can't be helped. quote:Not fully and no reasonable person should find their response acceptable
And yes they did end up cooperating
quote:Prove it
No because they were trash
quote:Ok gaslighter. What they found were astonishingly rampant election irregularities.
they didn't submit anything of substance
quote:What they uncovered is on record for anyone to see.
Did cyber ninja ever actually produce everything they committed too or is their penalty still accruing?
quote:That does nothing to disprove what they found
I believe they are now defunct
quote:Prove what they found was inaccurate
like most scams
quote:They responded to Maricopa's nonsense rebuttal
they eventually packed up and went away
Posted on 9/6/23 at 1:47 am to TheQuestion
quote:
They responded to Maricopa's nonsense rebuttal
Link to response to Maricopa's rebuttal?
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:58 am to CelticDog
quote:
ill vote D down ballot over a whole party of venal liars and enablers
Enablers....
That's rich... The ultimate irony is a democrat calling a Republican an "enabler."
Posted on 9/6/23 at 6:23 am to exiledhogfan
quote:
I will type this slowly.
Perhaps you should type a bit slower & give what's left of your brain a chance to keep up.
quote:
More than five dozen court cases got laughed out of court. For. Having. No. Proof.
Much better. Now you're typing looks to be in sync with your brain cells...both of them.
As for those court cases...you're a clueless idiot.
quote:
Three years have passed. Why has no one shown PROOF?
Three years have passed & you still think 5 dozen court cases got laughed out of court...
For. Having. No. Proof.
You should be laughed off of this board...
For. Having. No. Clue.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 6:47 am to TheQuestion
quote:yeah, that Damone is one geniusy sort of deep poster. "Yikes" is only the beginning of the monumental epic known as damone
quote:
Damone
So you apparently missed the 2 long lists I cited. Care to break them down point by point?
Of course not. But you'll certainly type substantive posts like
quote:
Yikes
Well THAT settles it.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 6:47 am to oklahogjr
quote:we are quite sure that YOU dont
I'm not sure If you know how an election works but evidence was created and collected and then approved by multiple levels
nor anyone supporting election theft
This post was edited on 9/6/23 at 6:48 am
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:24 am to JJJimmyJimJames
defenders of the myth of "stolen" like to claim grievance that courts did not allow the claims to be heard.
why doesnt someone post a coherent exploration of the claims?
do a thread.
make it organized.
state.
issue. describe so we can all see the evidence.
one by one.
show your work .
lets see the goods.
and do note that if the claim relates to process.
and whether the gop party has addressed such issues in time for 2024.
why doesnt someone post a coherent exploration of the claims?
do a thread.
make it organized.
state.
issue. describe so we can all see the evidence.
one by one.
show your work .
lets see the goods.
and do note that if the claim relates to process.
and whether the gop party has addressed such issues in time for 2024.
This post was edited on 9/6/23 at 8:28 am
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:33 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
some of those had very suspicious signatures that didn't match signatures on file.
suspicious? very suspicious! who said? what happened?
some?.. a number
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:41 am to 2020_reVISION
quote:
5 dozen court cases got laughed out of court...
For. Having. No. Proof.
sort those out for the lurkers.
what issue.
what relief was sought.
why was the matter not permitted to get trial?
were most rejected as matters that were known to all long before the election and therefore could have been addressed before the election?
why so much failing?
after all, half the judges were gop appointees or ran as Republicans.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 9:04 am to exiledhogfan
quote:
In 2016, Democrats ran Hillary,..
So, they voted for Trump. And he won.
Not a god damned soul claimed Trump stole the election.
Every one of your posts contains at least one blatant lie.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 9:11 am to exiledhogfan
quote:
But they forgot to steal the gubernatorial election for her while they were stealing the election for Biden. Oops?
Yet another idiotic, brain-dead response.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:06 pm to texridder
quote:Cyber Ninjas response
Link to response to Maricopa's rebuttal?
Page 15 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News