re: 2000 Mules Fact Checking

quote:

---

None of that exists.

---

Why do libs think that they can speak things into existence?

Now which cope will libs do to downplay this?
A. That's not the same guy
B. How do you know he doesn't really have 60 registered voters in his immediate family?
C. How do you know he isn't voting for Trump?
D. OK you found the ONLY ONE, but it wasn't enough to change the outcome
E. Voter fraud never happens cuz muh courts said so and you're a racist!

quote:

---

something is going to presented as science based evidence they show show the supporting methodology.

---

Another nothing post from a nothing poster.

quote:

---

I'd wager that this initial documentary isn't the end of the story.

---

It won't be. There's a market out there for this and you'll get some more kraken like shite before it's all over with.

quote:

---

quote:
only one whistleblower


Odd. Not all that long ago these same "journalists" thought this was more than enough to impeach a president.

---

Aww Fck.

Brutal

quote:

---

It won't be. There's a market out there for this and you'll get some more kraken like shite before it's all over with.

---

So... You actually think POTATUS got more than 81 million votes? Keep in mind, honesty will serve you better than team sports here.

quote:

---

The problem is there is no meat behind it.

---

What is the meat behind the Hillary's "illegitimate president" declaration - (along with every other DEM and media and hi-tech org out there.)

What was the impetus behind the entire Russia Collusion HOAX - a hoax that was definitely known from the git-go.

And you know, nobody else tried to squelch the Muller Special Counsel Investigation - we welcomed it (at least I did - because I thought they would look at ALL collusion and I was of the mind that HILLARY CLINTON would be found to be the one colluding with Russia.)

But you know what Mueller did - absolute declare HRC stuff OFF-LIMITs with ZERO 'investigation' - that is because they ALL knew the 'collusion' hoax was all bullshite.

but that did not stop them from speeded THREE & 1/2 YEARS hobbling every action Trump tried to do. They in fact ROBBED Donald Trump of his effects venues over the entire breadth of his tenure. = THEN they stole the next election from him and are trying to RULE OUT the potential for him to run again.

SHOW ONE IOTA of '

quote:

---

Give me a name. Lets hold these people accountable, get them on video, ask some questions. Hell anything.

---

that will substantiate ANY piece of the FIVE YEAR ASSAULT on Donald Trump

JUST ONE item - hell - produce a RUMOR that you think has not been thoroughly and comically DEBUNKED.

This entire - show me the evidence bullshite pisses me OFF>

We have some PRIVATE organization spending their OWN MONEY to cobble together an unimaginable amount of data that DWARFs anything that out PUBLICLY FUNDED FEDERAL 'investigative" organizations have the RESPONSIBILITY to do - while THEY concentrate their efforts on harassing parents at school boards and observations on message boards.

All you 'show me the evidence' asshats need to shut your damn mouths unless you were EQUALLY vocal against the OCEANS of HOAXES Donald Trump was subject to.

This is a clown world.

edit - forgive my fumble fingered typos - I am definitely pissed at this bullshite - in addition being interrupted constantly by real world crap while I am trying top type. .

quote:

---

So... You actually think POTATUS got more than 81 million votes? Keep in mind, honesty will serve you better than team sports here.

---

I dunno. I'm open minded to the possibility the election was stolen. There's historical precedent for this. This documentary though doesn't prove it. This is a sucker's game.

quote:

---

This documentary though doesn't prove it.

---

There is 100,000,00 times the information here than there was in the Russia Collusion Hoax.

There is at least enough information presented to prompt investigation by the people whose JOB is to ensure JUSTICE to ALL.

NOT for just the multi-gendered wanna-be anarchist/dictatorial/oligarchal interests.

I'm watching Robert Barnes' live stream on locals and he is destroying every fact check point. Hopefully, he will make this public at some point.

quote:

---

This documentary though doesn't prove it.

---

What does "proof" look like to you in this scenario? Emails showing a coordinated effort? 2000 mules confessing?

When you look at the aggregate of the evidence - the highly improbable outcome numerically, the statistical anomalies, the suspicious behavior of people in positions of power (meaning even enough power to block people's lines of sight through a window with cardboard) - and then you add in the assurances from the least trustworthy people of how "secure" our election was when there is no such thing when ballot boxes can be stuffed, fraudulent ballots can be mailed in, etc...

The only thing missing was moving from theory to evidence, and now we have it. We knew all along illegal ballot harvesting was going on and that the elderly (and previously elderly) voters were having their votes stolen - but now we have proof, or if not proof, pretty damn good evidence that it happened.