Started By
Message

re: 2 sick men performed a sex act during the "family friendly" West Hollywood Pride Parade

Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:13 pm to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

So minimum security, early release, and the recidivism.
where do you get this, from my statement that I would support longer sentences and greater supervision? I honestly cannot decide whether you people are dumb as shite, completely fricking illiterate, or absolutely bonkers insane. perhaps some combination of the three
This post was edited on 6/5/23 at 2:16 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44313 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:21 pm to
Soooooo…

Longer sentences, minimum security, early release, and the recidivism.

Is that better?
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90770 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

where do you get this
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Longer sentences, minimum security, early release, and the recidivism. Is that better?
Not much. You aren’t bright.

my ideal solution would be longer sentences, yes.

While in prison, no, I do not think that they need to be in maximum-security, for all the reasons that we have discussed… summarized as low risk of escape and higher risk of extra judicial vigilante punishment by other prisoners.

I said absolutely nothing about early release, and you know it (unless you cannot read English, and I am beginning to think that I should not discount this possibility).

once that longer sentence is completed, greater post-release supervision, probably in the form of something like group homes, curfews, and electronic monitoring.

Will there still be some recidivism? Yes, there will. The only way to prevent that is either capital punishment or lifetime imprisonment on a first offense. Candidly, I don’t think either of those potential solutions will pass muster under the US Constitution.
This post was edited on 6/5/23 at 2:28 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

summarized as low risk of escape


It should be a no risk of escape.

Theyre ruining children for life.

There is no sane reason to put kid rapists in min security unless they put years into the system and become totally trustworthy
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90770 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

higher risk of extra judicial vigilante punishment by other prisoners.
Most rapists particularly ones that rape children face this everyday in prison.

Bummer huh Pedo?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

quote:

higher risk of extra judicial vigilante punishment by other prisoners.
Most rapists particularly ones that rape children face this everyday in prison. Bummer huh ...?
"Bummer" in the sense of some sympathy for the perpetrator? Not really, no. As I have said, I have no problem with harsher LEGAL punishments.

"Bummer" in the sense of a major failure the rule of law in general and of of our criminal justice system in particular, because it is giving tacit approval to extrajudicial vigilantism? Yes.

The distinction seems to confuse inferior minds.
This post was edited on 6/5/23 at 2:41 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Most rapists particularly ones that rape children face this everyday in prison.

Bummer huh Pedo?


It was his main concern the last time we visited this.

Pedos getting mistreated, so we must put them in cushier environs.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90770 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Pedos getting mistreated, so we must put them in cushier environs.

Just pedos.

Everyone else, well you fricks can suffer the fates of the penal system.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Just pedos.

Everyone else, well you fricks can suffer the fates of the penal system.


thats his only concern.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Just pedos.

Everyone else, well you fricks can suffer the fates of the penal system
No, you illiterate. As I have said multiple times (even in this thread), any offender with a low statistical incidence of attempted escape. It is just fiscally prudent.

prison exists to punish a prisoner by isolating him for society and to protect society by isolating the prisoner from law-abiding citizens. Those two goals should always be pursued at the most physically prudent manner possible. do otherwise is fiscally irresponsible
This post was edited on 6/5/23 at 2:47 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

thats his only concern.
Continuing to repeat this stupid lie will not make it true, Roger.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

thats his only concern.
Continuing to repeat this stupid lie will not make it true, Roger.


Hank, you are totally lost.

You have created this caricature of yourself and angry at everyone else.

Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90770 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

a low statistical incidence of attempted escape.
Aren't all max prison falling under the low statistical occurrence?

Everyone is a dolt, illiterate etc!
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Aren't all max prison falling under the low statistical occurrence?


Why, I believe they are and we would save money long term keeping them locked up.

They wouldnt be able to ever create another predator.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44313 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

once that longer sentence is completed, greater post-release supervision, probably in the form of something like group homes, curfews, and electronic monitoring.



Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Everyone is a dolt, illiterate
Everyone who ignores my actual positions and continues to argue against their own fantasies, misinterpretations and strawmen, yes.

You will NEVER see me use that terminology regarding someone who engages in a good faith debate regarding my ACTUAL positions, no matter how much I might disagree with his positions.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90770 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Everyone who ignores my actual positions
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44313 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Everyone who ignores my actual positions


Pro-trannie & pro-pedo?
Posted by stampman
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
5240 posts
Posted on 6/5/23 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

there are millions of pedos, and you decided they should all do min security.


Not only that....he doesn't want them to have to "mingle" with other criminals because they certainly are not really deserving of being treated like them.
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram