Started By
Message

re: 1st quarter GDP: 3.2%

Posted on 4/27/19 at 6:01 am to
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 4/27/19 at 6:01 am to
quote:

really, because i'm looking at your "know what else" thread and it has NOTHING about jobs numbers, housing market, trade, stocks, manufacturing, etc. nada. also, i've seen several of your stupid threads and the op almost invariably discusses gdp and forecasts and that's about it.


for the second time, take a look at my tracker thread, which, in addition to being regularly updated upon the release of varying types of data, contained in its OP a review of recent trends in:

personal consumption data
capital investment data
personal income data
manufacturer's orders

and the projections from several alternative forecasting houses
quote:

usually a response to someone else who brought it up.

you sure are comfortable for being so consistently, objectively wrong. i bumped that thread with updates and recaps of what new data drove the updates consistently, whether upward or downward. this is the kind of info that posters like you instinctively go apoplectic over, and eventually whine enough to have anchored. then, accuse me of only talking about the negative stuff.
quote:

you are a serial liar

thicc projection, just like the one about being one-sided in the things i bring up
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73548 posts
Posted on 4/27/19 at 9:19 am to
quote:

90proofprofessional


Fake news
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 4/27/19 at 9:19 am to
quote:

for the second time
i just cited a thread where you did NONE of that. and i know there are others so don't act like you're all over it. because you aren't and i proved it.

quote:

a review of recent trends in
and herein lies why you are one of the worst people here:

"Up to"
"Soars up"

you make dumb thread poopooing the gdp. people remind you of the bigger picture. you get mad because no one recognizes your perceived intelligence. wash, rinse, repeat. you're accomplishing nothing. you have no purpose. you contribute nothing of substance mr. confront the data.

quote:

you sure are comfortable for being so consistently, objectively wrong
and you are freaking delusional. it happens basically every time. you are the most pathological liar of all time. "no you didn't."

quote:

bumped that thread with updates and recaps of what new data drove the updates consistently
yeah. a thread from march 2019. you have for more than a year been forced by others to recognize the bigger picture.

quote:

accuse me of only talking about the negative stuff
accuse?

quote:

thicc projection, just like the one about being one-sided in the things i bring up
here is your thread from this month that has only gdp in the op. you are a liar
Posted by BigAppleBucky
New York
Member since Jan 2014
1807 posts
Posted on 4/27/19 at 9:43 am to
3.2% is excellent. Especially almost ten years into a growth cycle.

This shows there is no need for the FRB to increase the rate of monetary expansion. Doing so would probably spur inflation which is much easier to start than tamp down.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 4/27/19 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

i just cited a thread where you did NONE of that

literally in response to a post where i pointed you to my tracker

lol, just lol
quote:

people remind you of the bigger picture. you get mad because no one recognizes your perceived intelligence.

lmaooooooooooooooo

to both of those claims
quote:

you have for more than a year been forced by others to recognize the bigger picture.

haha just wow
quote:

that has only gdp in the op

it literally cites in the op the entire month of good news that i discussed in the tracker before you pussies had it anchored!

Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 4/27/19 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

shows there is no need for the FRB to increase the rate of monetary expansion

definitely hard to argue that rates are too high
This post was edited on 4/27/19 at 12:09 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147293 posts
Posted on 4/28/19 at 9:30 am to
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46341 posts
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:30 am to
quote:

You are melting so hard in this thread Hail Trump


I've actually found some respect for 100ProofFraud, he's sustaining a respectable controlled Melt in this thread. When you're a never Trumper economist and Trump keeps dragging his positive economic growth junk across your jowls I can understand how difficult it must be to participate in this thread.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:27 am to
rep mark green is spouting wrong numbers

2017 was 2.2, not 2.5
2018 was 2.9, not 3.0

his 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 numbers are all significantly off as well

also that quote is completely fabricated

just thought you might want to know because we all agree that facts are important
This post was edited on 4/28/19 at 11:31 am
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69358 posts
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:35 am to
90proof, please explain to me the meaningful difference between 2.9 and 3.0

How does a .1 percentage point difference affect me as a worker and a consumer?
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:42 am to
quote:

please explain to me the meaningful difference between 2.9 and 3.0

if by "meaningful" you mean "big", i don't believe there is one

failing to reach that threshold for an annual figure, despite getting 2.9, is merely a marker laid down frequently by obama critics, far as i can tell

so the fact that 2018 failed to reach it is only meaningful in those terms
This post was edited on 4/28/19 at 11:43 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147293 posts
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:55 am to
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147293 posts
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:56 am to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48663 posts
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:57 am to
quote:

failing to reach that threshold for an annual figure, despite getting 2.9, is merely a marker laid down frequently by obama critics, far as i can tell


Perhaps because Obama said talking about 3.0 was irresponsible. He couldn’t do it even with QE.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 4/28/19 at 12:04 pm to
everything i said about that idiot's tweet is still correct
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 4/28/19 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Obama said talking about 3.0 was irresponsible

link? i'm not even sure what you mean by "talking about" it. what do you mean
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram