- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 17-year-old is on life support after being shot by San Antonio officer at McDonald's
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:05 am to International_Aggie
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:05 am to International_Aggie
quote:
Imagine if you were in a parking lot at night, eating a burger when someone throws the door open, puts a gun at you, and shouts at you to get out. In that instant, would you “just comply?”
was the guy in a police uniform? while I'm just randomly eating this burger, do I know I have tags on my car that are not supposed to be?
1
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:07 am to Rebel
The video doesn’t look great for anyone.
The driver could clearly see it’s a police officer (assuming he’s in uniform). He processes it and decides the best action is to drive off.
The police officer shoots a guy who is not putting him in any imminent danger.
The driver could clearly see it’s a police officer (assuming he’s in uniform). He processes it and decides the best action is to drive off.
The police officer shoots a guy who is not putting him in any imminent danger.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:11 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Bootlickers are of sub-human intelligence. Stupid people don’t upset me.
But you're stupid, so...
Not really losing sleep over what some random idiot thinks about me. My question isn't hard or inappropriate. You're just an ideological hack.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:11 am to SagginInRefelct
quote:
Yes, it means exactly that. Cop had NO right unless he suspected a guy eating a burger broke the law, period
a cop doesnt have the right to approach or speak to someone? you believe a cop is breaking the law every time he walks up to someone to ask questions about a situation? that's pretty dumb.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:12 am to SagginInRefelct
quote:
He is a free citizen and can do, act, and react however he wants...as long as it doesn't break laws.
He did NOT break a law. He is under ZERO laws forcing him to respond to a cop who isn't detaining him.
Try driving away from a cop and see what happens.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:13 am to the808bass
quote:
It absolutely matters to the press and public narrative. It’s wild that anyone would pretend otherwise.
yeah i mean i guess i agree with that, but that's more an indictment on the stupidity of people watching the news. they should be equally outraged regardless of the backstory.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:13 am to WeirdFlex
quote:
nB4 'If He WouLD HaVe CoMpLiEd!!'
Nah...if the bastard had ordered faster.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:18 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Try driving away from a cop and see what happens.
You might be surprised. If you're not being detained under reasonable suspicion (as opposed to a fishing expedition or cop wanting to play bully), the cop has no authority to pursue you.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:19 am to squid_hunt
quote:
But you're stupid, so...
Spends 8 pages defending a piece of shite who’s actions were completely out of line with training and policies and unjustified according to his own department, thinks other people are stupid.
The biggest problem with the internet is it gives fricking morons like you the ability to impose your stupidity on the rest of us.
quote:
Not really losing sleep over what some random idiot thinks about me
You aren’t intelligent enough to have your sleeping patterns impacted in this manner.
quote:
My question isn't hard or inappropriate.
“There is nothing difficult to understand about your explanation. You’re just not intelligent enough to understand why your explanation is not relevant.”
quote:
You're just an ideological hack.
Youre still a coward that is afraid to answer a direct question.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:20 am to the808bass
quote:
The driver could clearly see it’s a police officer (assuming he’s in uniform). He processes it and decides the best action is to drive off
It bothers me that the cop is parked like he's going in for a Big Mac, the vehicle not in any position consistent with action relative to this kid's car, and the cop car's lights are not flashing.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:20 am to the808bass
quote:
That is not connected to this case without further evidence. The police initially charged Cantu with assault and evading arrest. If they had evidence the car was stolen, they would almost have certainly included that charge with the other two.
You’re decompensating.
A cop is unable to recognize a car the next night that fled? All I'm saying is answer the question. Is this the same guy, yay or nay? Given the current political environment it is reasonable to assume they aren't pursuing the charges for political reasons. Alternatively, maybe they are holding those charges as leverage against the impending lawsuit. We don't know because no one is reporting on it and that in itself is suspicious.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:21 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Youre still a coward that is afraid to answer a direct question.
I answered every question. You don't like my answers. Not my problem.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:33 am to squid_hunt
quote:
I answered every question. You don't like my answers. Not my problem
Word salad nonsense is not an answer.
Why are you justifying this piece of shite based on nothing but hypotheticals when his own department, that already has all the answers to your hypotheticals, has said his actions were unjustified?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:35 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Why are you justifying this piece of shite based on nothing but hypotheticals when his own department, that already has all the answers to your hypotheticals, has said his actions were unjustified?
Your assumption is wrong and I already addressed it. Why aren't you concerned whether our sweet victim ran off because he was caught in the act?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:39 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Your assumption is wrong
This is you flaunting your sub human intellect, again.
quote:
and I already addressed it.
This is you being a coward, again.
quote:
Why aren't you concerned whether our sweet victim ran off because he was caught in the act?
This you failing to answer a simple direct question, again.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:41 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
This is you flaunting your sub human intellect, again.
This is you not reading plain English.
Your question is based on faulty logic, but being so super astute, I assume you knew that.
Was the kid a car jacker or not?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:45 am to squid_hunt
quote:Based on the lack of charges, one would surmise the answer is "no".
Was the kid a car jacker or not?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:45 am to squid_hunt
quote:
What says that?
Article I read about the incident. Per that article the kid/car was not the one he’d chased previously.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:46 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Based on the lack of charges, one would surmise the answer is "no".
Well, I guess antifa/BLM were innocent in 2020 and so is Hunter Biden. What's all the yelling and anger about on the PT board?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 11:47 am to riverdiver
quote:
Article I read about the incident. Per that article the kid/car was not the one he’d chased previously.
What article? The OP? That's not what it said. Unless you have another article, you misread.
Page 8 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News