Started By
Message

re: 12th Grade Girls Are Far Less Likely Than Boys To Say They Want To Get Married Someday

Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:51 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Holistically, men benefit from marriage more than women.
Well, we are going to disagree strongly on that point, Cubs.

Again, marriage is a partnership. If one partner doesn't feel up to the homemaking task, the duo works out an alternative. Simple. Done.

There is a reason husband and wife fall into more "traditional" roles though, and it ain't male toxicity. There is a reason kids do better in two-parent households, and it ain't male toxicity. There is a reason being a single parent mother is the biggest US noneducational demographic poverty predictor, and it ain't male toxicity.

There is a reason 25% of female physicians are not working full-time within six years of completing training, compared with less than 5% of men, and it ain't male toxicity. There is a reason women habitually sniff the merchandise at Yankee Candle Shop while men either stay outside or wander around aimlessly. There is a reason women are equally disinterested in men's treks to the hardware store. Men and women are wired differently, Cubs.

Now that absolutely does not mean every man or woman fits the mold. But stereotypes exist for a reason, just as partnerships (marital or otherwise) succeed or fail for a reason.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

It’s a common misconception that women only started working outside the home because of modern social movements. In reality, women have worked in many roles for centuries, and the growth of female employment was driven by major economic and social shifts long before recent cultural debates around feminism.

by 1910 about one in four women over age 14 in the United States was earning wages.
Okay

quote:

That framing only works if you pretend history started in 1968. For most of history, marriage was an economic necessity for women.
And there is the contradiction.

Those two quotes are carelessly antithetical.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61469 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

Those two quotes are carelessly antithetical.


How so?
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
20252 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

WTF are we doing?



It's called PUBLIC SCHOOL. School should not be funded by taxpayers.
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
20252 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

They have no idea how hard the fricking pendulum is going to snap back as Gen Z men get into power. Some Millennials too, but Gen Z are really waking up and no longer giving a frick about the post-WWII rules based order bullshite.




I have seen no evidence of this
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

How so?
For most of history, women were the household breadwinners who then cooked the bread for their men, and children.

vs

For most of history, marriage was an economic necessity for women.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70548 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

I have seen no evidence of this


Google "gen z revolts" or "Strawhat Revolutions". Zoomers men, tired of high unemployment and rising costs of living amid media censorship and oppressive regimes, are toppling governments around the globe on a weekly basis lately. They already successfully took down the governments of Nepal, Madagascar, and Kenya. Indonesia, Iran, and Mexico are holding on by a thread. They have successfully thrown out entrenched no-liberal administrations in several European countries and are gaining momentum in Germany, Portugal, and the UK. Zoomer men are done with "modernity".
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61469 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

For most of history, women were the household breadwinners who then cooked the bread for their men, and children.


This was never claimed. Women provided unpaid labor at home with the rest of the family on the family farm. Then they started earning wages during the Industrial Revolution.

quote:

For most of history, marriage was an economic necessity for women.
This is true.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

It's called PUBLIC SCHOOL.
Indeed
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13597 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

This thread is an excellent demonstration of why women are choosing to forego marriage to men.


You don't know why that is. The data directly contradicts every reason you give for it.
This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 5:30 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

For most of history, women were the household breadwinners who then cooked the bread for their men, and children.
---

This was never claimed.
But it was, unfortunately.
quote:

t’s a common misconception that women only started working outside the home because of modern social movements. In reality, women have worked in many roles for centuries, and the growth of female employment was driven by major economic and social shifts long before recent cultural debates around feminism.

by 1910 about one in four women over age 14 in the United States was earning wages.



quote:

Women provided unpaid labor at home with the rest of the family on the family farm. Then they started earning wages during the Industrial Revolution
Let's examine that quite factual statement. Women provided unpaid labor at home with the rest of the family on the family farm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

For most of history, marriage was an economic necessity for women.
This is true.
Tell it to Elizabeth I.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61469 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

You don't know why that is. The data directly contradicts every reason you give for it.


Like what, specifically? You may not like this but I have a lot more insight about this than any of the angry and/or befuddled men participating in this thread.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61469 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Tell it to Elizabeth I.


I’m sure this wasn’t true for every single individual woman alive at the time . I didn’t think that needed to be stated.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61469 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:55 pm to
Can you bold the section that claimed women were the breadwinners?
Posted by lurking
Member since Nov 2022
2458 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

And the advice isn't for men to improve themselves to become more palatable to women, it's that men should seek out desperate women in foreign countries with no other options to marry instead.


What makes them desperate, specifically? It’s no secret American women are among the least desirable in the world. Higher quality/value women from foreign lands replacing you doesn’t make those women desperate.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

Can you bold the section that claimed women were the breadwinners?
You claim it as true? I'll happily bold it.

Cubs, I have ZERO issues with acknowledging a woman as the "everything" in a relationship. I have ZERO issues acknowledging individual spousal contributions. The problem you have is not understanding the truth of Brenda Barnes (Pepsi). Look her up.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

men should seek out desperate women in foreign countries
"Desperate" is a floating signifier.

The women being referenced are no more "desperate" than their male counterparts. That is the point. Does a nation's poverty dictate a female's individual worth?

It is the kind of question for which such females might happily answer with an eligible DESIRABLE US dude.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61469 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

You claim it as true? I'll happily bold it.


No! I’m trying to figure out where you got this idea from. Women were not the breadwinners when they worked on the family farm. Or in factories.

I don’t think women are universally and unequivocally everything in every relationship. Women are socialized to absorb male discomfort and we’re socialized to be caretakers. We’re conditioned to “take what you can get.” Men are not.
This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 6:36 pm
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90799 posts
Posted on 1/5/26 at 6:48 pm to
How about you bitches absorb earlier death?

Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram