- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "???" For "MUH" Corrupt Political Establishment DENIERS. After MN, Do U STILL Think It's..
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:18 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Want me to find articles from the MSM reporting the 2022 prosecutions by Biden's DOJ to disprove this statement?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:19 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
He has all but admitted he wants bad things to happen to a person who is MAGA. He hates us.
This. The dude's TDS is incredible.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
Apparently, SFP thinks that a group of people with an average IQ of 68 pulled this off without any help.
Is the only option for that help the "Deep State"? Yes or no.
There it is. TDSFP is so hellbent on denying a Deep State actually exists, and even more so... a Deep State that has been out to sabotage/destroy Trump and the MAGA movement. That's all he's about. Every retarded stance he takes and rambles on for 400 posts in these threads is simply anti-Trump/MAGA. He knows it but will continue to deny it. He's broken.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But turning "people scamming federal dollars" into "The Deep State" is quite the leap without much solid framing.
That's the distinction they will not see.
Ask me at any point—10 years ago, 1 week ago, or any time in between—"Do you think that government officials routinely scam federal dollars?" My answer would have been, "Does the Pope wear a funny hat?"
You ask me if I believe in an unauthorized, unelected network of power populated by "elites" that run the entire world entirely behind the scenes and control the weather, my answer is, "Stop smoking that stuff, it's rotting your brain."
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Just look at this thread. I've destroyed 2-3 posters (on topic posters).
Talk about delusional.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:35 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Ask me at any point—10 years ago, 1 week ago, or any time in between—"Do you think that government officials routinely scam federal dollars?" My answer would have been, "Does the Pope wear a funny hat?"
You ask me if I believe in an unauthorized, unelected network of power populated by "elites" that run the entire world entirely behind the scenes and control the weather, my answer is, "Stop smoking that stuff, it's rotting your brain."
Basically, but the 2nd paragraph for me ends with, "show me the actual evidence without dot-connecting and I'll think about it."
This thread was very terrible for the "Deep State" crowd.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:36 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
There it is. TDSFP is so hellbent on denying a Deep State actually exists, and even more so... a Deep State that has been out to sabotage/destroy Trump and the MAGA movement.
You interpreted the above, from....this?
quote:
Apparently, SFP thinks that a group of people with an average IQ of 68 pulled this off without any help.
Is the only option for that help the "Deep State"? Yes or no.
I notice you didn't even answer the question
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:42 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
And why aren’t you even halfway curious about it?
SFP doesn’t care and is only here to deflect and defend the democrats. Leftist like SFP will always toe the party line. Just look how he’s sucking off the Biden DOJ while deflecting and denying the rest of the story
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:47 am to Bourre
quote:
SFP doesn’t care and is only here to deflect and defend the democrats. Leftist like SFP will always toe the party line.
You may not have been able to pick a worse example to vomit this up
When did Leftists become budget hawks hyper-focused on less spending?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
lot of dots to connect, with credible evidence along each connection
Sir - this is a Sonic - the courtroom is down on Main Street.
I am a stickler for grammar. I could generate thousands of more posts in my log if I attacked every one of them.
I am also a stickler for logic, truth, and common sense. As long as what someone posts is congruent with the topic and is not crosswise with obvious truths, then I accept the point being addressed and move on.
You have an unwelcome propensity to practice your 'courtroom persona' here with the intent of a defense attorney defending an obvious murderer. You refuse to let a conversation go forward that does not meet YOUR standard of courtroom precision. If I were a guilty murderer, I would want someone like you clogging up the prosecution.
And has been pointed out - you are very definitely prejudiced wrt which side of the political argument you practice your trade. Rarely do you clog up a thread demeaning Trump or conservatives in general.
But any attempt to discuss the latest revelations in the ongoing corruption at all levels of the democrat party has to pass your pristine rhetorical barrier or else you will add dozens of pages to the discussion.
You could actually be a valuable asset to the board - making relevant commentary as to the strict legality of a topic when relevant - as long as you devoted equal time to both sides.
But you be you - and the rest of us will continue to chastise your lop-sided inputs.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:51 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Sir - this is a Sonic - the courtroom is down on Main Street.
We're not at court-levels of evidence in this discussion.
Arguments still require evidence to support them.
quote:
You refuse to let a conversation go forward that does not meet YOUR standard of courtroom precision.
Do you think evidence is necessary to support arguments?
quote:
But any attempt to discuss the latest revelations in the ongoing corruption at all levels of the democrat party has to pass your pristine rhetorical barrier or else you will add dozens of pages to the discussion.
This thread is not about "the latest revelations". It's about a version of "the Deep State". An argument made without
quote:
logic, truth, and common sense.
OR factual support
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Can you show your work that the Biden DOJ actually tried to stop the massive corruption; which also included ballot harvesting to get Ilan OMAR and others elected?
Possibly you're confusing the corruption in the early 2000s?
Possibly you're confusing the corruption in the early 2000s?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:12 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Can you show your work that the Biden DOJ actually tried to stop the massive corruption;
The indictments and prosecutions aren't evidence enough for you?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:15 pm to BTROleMisser
The dude has lost his goddamned mind.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:17 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
I am a stickler for grammar. I could generate thousands of more posts in my log if I attacked every one of them.
I am also a stickler for logic, truth, and common sense. As long as what someone posts is congruent with the topic and is not crosswise with obvious truths, then I accept the point being addressed and move on.
You have an unwelcome propensity to practice your 'courtroom persona' here with the intent of a defense attorney defending an obvious murderer. You refuse to let a conversation go forward that does not meet YOUR standard of courtroom precision. If I were a guilty murderer, I would want someone like you clogging up the prosecution.
And has been pointed out - you are very definitely prejudiced wrt which side of the political argument you practice your trade. Rarely do you clog up a thread demeaning Trump or conservatives in general.
But any attempt to discuss the latest revelations in the ongoing corruption at all levels of the democrat party has to pass your pristine rhetorical barrier or else you will add dozens of pages to the discussion.
You could actually be a valuable asset to the board - making relevant commentary as to the strict legality of a topic when relevant - as long as you devoted equal time to both sides.
But you be you - and the rest of us will continue to chastise your lop-sided inputs.
One of the best, most insightful posts Ive ever read on this board. Great job.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:18 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
The dude has lost his goddamned mind.
Don't bring your embarrassment from the other thread in here
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:18 pm to KCT
quote:
One of the best, most insightful posts Ive ever read on this board. Great job
Already picked apart piece by piece.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which corruption, is the issue.
This Somali stuff clearly has legs, and the Biden DOJ did work in getting the ball rolling. Trump's DOJ looks to be following their lead.
But turning "people scamming federal dollars" into "The Deep State" is quite the leap without much solid framing.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. It is absolutely ludicrous that you are contending That the Biden administration or Democrats Would call out Minnesota's corruption and take formative action... Harming their vice presidential nominee Tim Walz.
You know damn well any knowledge of the corruption had to have been local Minnesota FBI Attorney General DA's. And that Biden administration DOJ at best sat on it.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:22 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
It is absolutely ludicrous that you are contending That the Biden administration or Democrats Would call out Minnesota's corruption and take formative action.
You know the indictments are public record, right?
quote:
You know damn well any knowledge of the corruption had to have been local Minnesota FBI Attorney General DA's.
local FBI Attorney General...DA? wut
Popular
Back to top


0






