- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Todd Masson caught trespassing?
Posted on 12/5/24 at 2:53 pm to riverdiver
Posted on 12/5/24 at 2:53 pm to riverdiver
quote:Mineral ownership comes into play in S La.
It’s not 1812 any more. If you own 100 acres of land, you should be paying taxes on that, not 900 acres of open water that’s adjoining other open water.
If a private canal is dug across private land to a public “navigable” state owned river, that doesnt give you (the public) the right to enter the private canal. I’m thinking N La application but the same principle would/should apply in S La.
This post was edited on 12/5/24 at 2:54 pm
0
Posted on 12/5/24 at 2:55 pm to White Bear
quote:
East Carroll, 2005
Bill and Will Walker
Posted on 12/5/24 at 2:59 pm to Ron Cheramie
quote:
The guy called it a bayou at first then said a trenasse
The only time I heard him say trenasse was in relation to casting his bait into a trenasse.
Posted on 12/5/24 at 3:32 pm to TopWaterTiger
quote:
Bubba Q. Public doesn't know if he's turning his boat down a bayou or trenasse.
The duck hunter said there were posted signs so I don’t know
Not to say there aren’t posted signs on 100% public areas
Posted on 12/5/24 at 3:32 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
some duck hunters out of bayou benoit tried to do this by red eye swamp to the crawfishermen. the next week both their houseboats were burnt to the waterline.
FAFO
FAFO
Posted on 12/5/24 at 5:20 pm to tigersownall
He handled that very well. I would have had a problem keeping my mouth shut.
I wish he would have gotten their boat number and affiliation with the waterway.
Louisiana has sold out and we can do something about it
The problem is that the money it will take to correct this situation, “owns” the water
I wish he would have gotten their boat number and affiliation with the waterway.
Louisiana has sold out and we can do something about it
The problem is that the money it will take to correct this situation, “owns” the water
Posted on 12/5/24 at 6:11 pm to riverdiver
quote:
Your state lawmakers could fix it if they weren’t occupied erecting giant Afro pick memorials.
The state lawmakers who can fix this don't give a shite about some afro pick sculpture.
It is 100% money based.
Posted on 12/5/24 at 8:40 pm to LSUengr
quote:
If it wasn't a navigable water way in 1812
A few more direct hurricane hits and 100 years in the future, a large section of the marsh will be open water and or part of the Gulf. Will it still be private then?
That 1812 shite is archaic and needs to be revised.
Posted on 12/5/24 at 8:53 pm to Bow08tie
quote:Pretty much that if you’re floating and not on anchor, you’re fine. The bottom can be privately owned, so you can technically be trespassing if you’re anchored. But if you’re drifting or under trolling motor power, you’re perfectly legal…..except in LA
A starting point is to review what other coastal states have in place and go from there.
Posted on 12/5/24 at 10:02 pm to Tiger Prawn
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/22/24 at 11:53 am
Posted on 12/5/24 at 10:12 pm to jcdogfish
Good post
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:36 am to tigersownall
Like the guy in the video said, how we call ourselves "Sportsman's Paradise" while this Law exists is hilarious
Sounds like the land owners wanted to have their cake and eat it too. If they didn't want public use of their land they should have forced the Oil and Gas companies to either close off access from public waterways or filled in the entrances
Of course the land owners wouldn't want this and would rather ease of access to "private waterways" that they got paid to allow access and build pipelines thru, and can now lease for "alot of money" like the hunter in the video says.
(Another thing is I hope our dumb government isn't using tax dollars on repairing these private marshes and waterways)
Sounds like the land owners wanted to have their cake and eat it too. If they didn't want public use of their land they should have forced the Oil and Gas companies to either close off access from public waterways or filled in the entrances
Of course the land owners wouldn't want this and would rather ease of access to "private waterways" that they got paid to allow access and build pipelines thru, and can now lease for "alot of money" like the hunter in the video says.
(Another thing is I hope our dumb government isn't using tax dollars on repairing these private marshes and waterways)
Posted on 12/6/24 at 6:06 am to tigersownall
Important sportsman issue. 67000 views in one day - probably staged.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 8:51 am to tigersownall
This is why I don't belong to CCA. They support landowners and refuse to support legislation to make LA like all other states. 
Posted on 12/6/24 at 9:16 am to tonydtigr
A simple fix that would ease the tensions and avoid 90% of these fights would be to change how destroyed wetland is treated. If there's marsh loss, stop taxing people on it and have it revert to the State. Leave canals alone. In that way, the taking aspect of it(see the Catahoula case) isn't as severe and there's less of a chance someone is on private property with almost no way to know.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 9:39 am to AlxTgr
quote:
A simple fix that would ease the tensions and avoid 90% of these fights would be to change how destroyed wetland is treated. If there's marsh loss, stop taxing people
I like the thought process, but unfortunately marsh loss is the rule, not the exception, about 90% of the marsh is disappearing at some rate. Some areas in Venice and a decent area in the Atchafalaya delta is building, but most of all the other areas are going poof.
The reason for the loss and those responsible will also be a point of extreme conflict.
That's not even getting into marsh and island building through dredging and diversions using public funds/resources.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 9:41 am to windriverwonders
quote:
This is why I don't belong to CCA. They support landowners and refuse to support legislation to make LA like all other states.
Same, gave up my membership when they refused to support the fisherman.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 9:53 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
gave up my membership when they refused to support the fisherman.
I hate that it's come to this, because they have actually done good work on some subjects and have been on fisherman's side. They chose this path and are hoping the ground swell stays at a minimal and most don't realize they have turned a cold shoulder. If they would attack this issue (publicly and otherwise) similar to the way they did the Red Snapper issue I believe their membership would spike again. They pay tons of money to lobbyist.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 10:05 am to AlxTgr
quote:
If there's marsh loss, stop taxing people on it and have it revert to the State
what if the land comes back?
Posted on 12/6/24 at 10:06 am to windriverwonders
quote:
This is why I don't belong to CCA. They support landowners and refuse to support legislation to make LA like all other states.
I don’t blame CCA for not taking up that fight. Its a lose lose situation
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News