- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scope Recommendations
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:38 am to mallardhank
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:38 am to mallardhank
1. That's all I have at the moment that's suitable for deer.
2. It'd mean a lot to get my first deer with this rifle.
3. I already stated that I plan on getting a different rifle to use as my primary deer rifle
2. It'd mean a lot to get my first deer with this rifle.
3. I already stated that I plan on getting a different rifle to use as my primary deer rifle
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:39 am to tilco
That's what I'm getting, the DNZ mount
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:43 am to BTRLSU5
For ammo, I'll suggest what you shouldn't use.
1) hornady leverevolution
2) buffalo bore (meant for bears)
3) hollow points
Any basic old 150 or 170 grain soft point will work fine.
1) hornady leverevolution
2) buffalo bore (meant for bears)
3) hollow points
Any basic old 150 or 170 grain soft point will work fine.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 12:03 pm to ChatRabbit77
quote:
Don't know if they make a fixed 3 power with a 9mm objective.
Sig Sauer actually just came out with one.

Posted on 7/31/17 at 5:46 pm to BTRLSU5
I love how people on this board act like a .30-30 is basically primitive hunting. They'll work out to ~175 yards just fine, further than a lot of people should even attempt to shoot. As far as ammo, keep it simple. Cheap soft points in 150 or 170 grains are fine.
This post was edited on 7/31/17 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 7/31/17 at 5:48 pm to Yellerhammer5
Yea, it's hardly a handicap for most people. The rifles are usually very accurate too. Mine will shoot 1" groups with pretty much anything you feed it.
It was once told that the .30-30 is so powerful, it is capable of knocking down 3 lunchroom ladies.
It was once told that the .30-30 is so powerful, it is capable of knocking down 3 lunchroom ladies.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 6:46 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
It was once told that the .30-30 is so powerful, it is capable of knocking down 3 lunchroom ladies.
I'm not sure if those are native up here. Do you know of any reputable guides for a hunt like that?
Posted on 7/31/17 at 7:16 pm to BTRLSU5
quote:
1. That's all I have at the moment that's suitable for deer. 2. It'd mean a lot to get my first deer with this rifle. 3. I already stated that I plan on getting a different rifle to use as my primary deer rifle
Don't apologize for using a 30-30. There's nothing wrong with hunting with one, unless you're hunting grizzly bear.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 8:02 pm to upgrade
Only a fool would apologize for using one. I can see why it's not ideal for many people, but I would wager over 100 bucks have fallen to the .30-30 at my camp alone.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 8:04 pm to Propagandalf
You win at internet for the day.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 9:31 pm to Yellerhammer5
quote:
They'll work out to ~175 yards just fine, further than a lot of people should even attempt to shoot.
This is why I was recommending fixed 3X, Why anyone not suffering from macular degeneration would need 7X at 150 yards or under is beyond me.
This tends to make folks think they can shoot far farther than the gun is capable of.
I love both my .35 as well as my .30-.30 but they both have their niche, quick brush busting snap shots is their forte, not fiddling with scopes. JMHO
Posted on 7/31/17 at 9:41 pm to cave canem
You don't NEED more than 3x for shooting typically, but it helps a whole lot to have more when doing things like deciding if you should shoot or not.
A 2-7 is far more utilitarian than a fixed power 3x or 4x. You can aim a rifle with a 2 power scope at your big toe and see it clearly, and 7x gives you enough to shoot at 150
A 2-7 is far more utilitarian than a fixed power 3x or 4x. You can aim a rifle with a 2 power scope at your big toe and see it clearly, and 7x gives you enough to shoot at 150
Posted on 7/31/17 at 10:08 pm to cave canem
I'll never understand why people think adjusting magnification is such an ordeal.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 10:32 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I am not a fan of scopes on them at all, but that is not what the OP asked about, to each his own though.
I am curious at what range you are getting these sub 1" groups at though.
I am curious at what range you are getting these sub 1" groups at though.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:52 pm to BTRLSU5
Lots of good suggestions so far.
I agree that a 2-7X has advantages not available w/ a fixed power. If the variable is to expensive, a nice 3X or 4X fixed power scope can still kill deer as far away as you can kill them w/ a 30/30. I also agree there's no need for the hunter using a 30/30 to apologize. Actually, to me it indicates the hunter understands the 30/30 has limitations and is willing to operate w/in those limitations. As far as loads, use whichever traditional 150-170 gr load shoots best in your gun that you can regularly find available locally.
OTOH, I'm NOT a fan of the one piece scope rings/base, like DNZ.I tried using such an outfit one time on a T/C Contender but the placement of the rings was not compatible w/ the scope turrets and bells. When available, I prefer a one piece, multi-slot Weaver Base w/ Burris Signature (the ones w/ the plastic inserts) Weaver-type rings. A properly mounted 2 scope rings w/ separate base will be just as accurate, sturdy and more flexible than the monopiece rings/base. I quit using anything other than the Burris Signature rings about 20 yrs ago and don't regret it one bit.
I agree that a 2-7X has advantages not available w/ a fixed power. If the variable is to expensive, a nice 3X or 4X fixed power scope can still kill deer as far away as you can kill them w/ a 30/30. I also agree there's no need for the hunter using a 30/30 to apologize. Actually, to me it indicates the hunter understands the 30/30 has limitations and is willing to operate w/in those limitations. As far as loads, use whichever traditional 150-170 gr load shoots best in your gun that you can regularly find available locally.
OTOH, I'm NOT a fan of the one piece scope rings/base, like DNZ.I tried using such an outfit one time on a T/C Contender but the placement of the rings was not compatible w/ the scope turrets and bells. When available, I prefer a one piece, multi-slot Weaver Base w/ Burris Signature (the ones w/ the plastic inserts) Weaver-type rings. A properly mounted 2 scope rings w/ separate base will be just as accurate, sturdy and more flexible than the monopiece rings/base. I quit using anything other than the Burris Signature rings about 20 yrs ago and don't regret it one bit.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 5:16 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
I would wager over 100 bucks have fallen to the .30-30 at my camp alone.
With the records kept, we could come up with a pretty close number.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 6:53 am to BTRLSU5
I hunted for years with a 336. It has a 4x40mm fixed power scope on it with see through mounts. All I ever shot out of it was Remington Corelocks. It always killed deer.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 10:36 am to cave canem
100 yards. It's a shame but my 336 is a less picky rifle than my tikka T3.
ETA: do you use a peep sight? I've been tempted to pull the scope off my rifle and put a peep sight. Scopes really suck in the rain.
ETA: do you use a peep sight? I've been tempted to pull the scope off my rifle and put a peep sight. Scopes really suck in the rain.
This post was edited on 8/1/17 at 10:38 am
Popular
Back to top


2




