Started By
Message

re: Ruger 30.06 not grouping well

Posted on 6/24/13 at 9:59 pm to
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 6/24/13 at 9:59 pm to
The stock is touching the barrel if the OP hasn't worked on it.

Make sure everything is tight and then take your time shooting.
Posted by LEASTBAY
Member since Aug 2007
14397 posts
Posted on 6/24/13 at 9:59 pm to
trade it in, had one like that and it drove me nuts. Wasnt worth it.
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 6/24/13 at 10:27 pm to
It sounds like it is your action screws. I believe they come from ruger set at like 95 inch pounds, which is insanely tight.

The 77 has three action screws, front middle and rear. Pull them and clean the threads with alcohol, the put a little blue loctite on them and boom the front one down tight as hell, the rear one a little less, and the middle one just snug. The front one is the one that is probably loose and causing your problem.
Posted by faxis
La.
Member since Oct 2007
7773 posts
Posted on 6/24/13 at 11:48 pm to
If it's not floated you're pissing up a rope
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:20 am to
FWIW, I remember American rifleman doing a review on some high end custom job where absolutely no effort was made to float the barrel and it was a tack driver.
Posted by upgrade
Member since Jul 2011
13261 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:38 am to
Everyone has already mentioned pretty good points, but I'll throw out a couple also.

First, how big are your five shot groups?
Five shot groups are not usually great with most factory rifles.

Second, how many rounds have been through the gun?
Is the barrel broken in yet, or maybe it's time for a cleaning.
A dirty barrel can affect your accuracy.
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
8002 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 7:54 am to
quote:

I haven't had good experiences with them.


My M77 .308 is good for deer hunting..but it's no tack driving, sub MOA rifle that's for sure.

I don't know if I'd trust it with a shot over 200yds.
Posted by faxis
La.
Member since Oct 2007
7773 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 10:01 am to


It's about repeatable harmonics. That barrel is like a bell. You touch it while you ring it, it makes a different sound from the time before when you weren't touching it. Now if you mount something to the bell it will make that different sound every time. In other words, you're still grouping consistently. So it's 'possible' to have something touching the barrel, then site in while it's touching it and get decent groups. But if you have a barrel that's floated and stays floated, you know for sure that it's consistently going to 'ring that bell' the same way every time. With something touching the barrel, heat can move where it touches it, which changes the tune kinda like moving your fingers up the frets on a guitar. Which moves the bullet in relation to the last one.

Can you get accuracy while touching the barrel? Yes, see the old Mannlicher Schauner stocks. Is it comparable to a modern floated barrel? No.
This post was edited on 6/25/13 at 10:18 am
Posted by BIG Texan
Texas
Member since Jun 2012
1609 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 10:43 am to
I had a varmint heavy barrel 308 Ruger. It had a presure point as it was not free floated. Got rid of it after the action screw in the bottom would come loose after a couple of rounds no matter how muchlocktite and tight you got it. It once went off when I closed the bolt. Luckily I always gently but firmly close the bolt withthe gun on the sand bags pointed down range. Had a can-jar trigger in that gun. It Jared.
Posted by BIG Texan
Texas
Member since Jun 2012
1609 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 10:53 am to
I have 2 Remington 700s one a 270 and the other a 7mm-08 both use pressure points in the for end from the factory and both shoot one inch groups at 200 w 2.5 -8 Leopold Vari x 3 scopes. Both have had trigger jobs but that is good as I can shoot, so you don't need to have a free floated barrel in every rifle, IMO.
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6837 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Problems is that with both I can group or link two shots then the next four to five are erratic.

Measuring the bullet holes center to center of the extreme spread, what size groups are you getting? I'll make some specific recs on the assumption that the accuracy is suboptimal.

quote:

Could it be the gun, the scope, or is the gun not liking the bullets and/or gr?

Yes, yes, yes and/or prolly not. You're going to have to work through a stepwise process to figure it out. Based on current info, I'd suspect a high point creating pressure on the stock, a problem w/ the scope, a problem w/ the rings/base or a problem w/ the action screws. Erratic shots sound more like a problem w/ the scope, ring, mounts or action screws. If there's a problem w/ a pressure point, the shots will gradually move in the direction AWAY from the pressure point.

A few things specific about Ruger. Their rifle barrels are not usually free floated the entire length of the barrel channel; there's usually a pressure point at the forend. Second, some have had signifiant accuracy issues w/ Rugers that are dependent the sequence of tightening up the 3 action screws. I worked w/ a friend's Ruger bolt action that became a LOT more accurate once I tightened the action screws in the correct sequence and torgue. I don't remember the specifics at this time, but you should be able to Google it.

1. Rule out a problem w/ the scope by changing to a scope you already know to be RELIABLE.
2. Remount the base, using BLUE Loc-Tite (NOT red). I always use the $10 Weaver bases, even on my prairie dog handguns. Easy, and cheap enough, to try your rifle w/ a Weaver base.ETA: Before installing the scope base w/ Loc-Tite, individually check the length of each screw. Put the base in place, then screw in a screw into the intended hole. If the base is not TIGHT, the screw is too long. If the screw is too long, cut off the excess w/ a Dremel tool or get a new screw. It should have a minimum of 3 threads for it to have adequate strength. If it doesn't, it's too short and will need to be replaced. Repeat this step w/ each screw in a different hole.
3. Remount the rings. I don't use Loc-Tite on the rings. Be sure the screws attaching the upper/lower rings are equally tightened. If the rings have not been lapped, do so. If you don't have the equipment to lap them or don't feel comfortable doing it, change the rings to Burris Signature Z-Rings (the ones w/ plastic inserts).
4. Check for any high spots in the barrel channel or action part of the stock.
5. As mentioned, the barrel should already be free floated from the pressure point to just in front of the action; if not, make it so. If it still doesn't shoot well, free float the pressure point at the forend of the stock. If needed, you can always recreate a pressure point on the barrel at the front tip of your stock by putting 1-2 business cards at the very front of the stock in the barrel channel. You can Google all this or look on YouTube.
6. Check the action screws as mentioned above.
7. Use a torque wrench (and follows it's recs) to adjust the mount, rings and action screws.
8. Try different ammo. Sometimes a gun barrel needs more than 3-4 shots w/ a particular load before it starts shooting that load well.
9. I don't worry to awfully much about letting a barrel cool down entirely between shots. A well bedded gun should be reasonably accurate even w/ a hot barrel. I'm leaving for a praire dog hunt in a few days. The guide said to count on 200 rounds/day. I can promise you my barrels will get hot, but the guns will still be VERY accurate.
10. Be sure the crown is not damaged.
11. Be sure the gun is clean, but use the proper equipment, i.e. a one piece steel rod (appropriate caliber) w/ a good bore guide. More gun barrels are ruined by poor cleaning technique than by being dirty.

If it's not reasonably improved w/ the above, I bet it's a more serious problem w/ the barrel/action itself. Good luck and keep us updated.

Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

See if you can slide a dollar bill between the stock and barrel all the way to the action.


This to start with. Also, check your chamber to see if it is clean. The handloads. Were they loaded just for that rifle? The way I work a round up is first using an empty round that is not crimped. I put the round in and chamber it, letting the bullet get pushed back by the barrel threads. Remic the round and the casing and trim the casing as needed. My finished round will be set to were the bullet is sitting inside the barrel threading. The casing will be just a hair short of the chamber for expansion.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 12:55 pm to
Just sayin, there was a $2500 rifle in there with a full contact stock shooting around 1/2 MOA
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 1:35 pm to
"The controlled-round-feed Model 77 action is in itself probably not as inherently accurate as push-feed actions such as the Savage and Remington. That's just part of the deal with Mauser-type actions. The Ruger Number One, with its two-piece stock and forward fore-end screw, has its own challenges for accuracy. Most shoot OK (some shoot wonderfully), but Ruger barrels are definitely not a culprit." - Craig Boddington

Out of the Box Accuracy - Guns and Ammo 2011

Pretty good article that addresses what this thread has brought up. I tend to agree that sub-moa accuracy has been elevated to mythical unicorn status and is largely unnecessary for hunting rifles. Of course, if you are a target shooter then that is a completely different thing.
Posted by ZacAttack
The Land Mass
Member since Oct 2012
6416 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 2:11 pm to
But but but, if I can't get 5 shot 1/2 inch groupings at 1000 yards how will I ever bring down a 100 lb deer at 50 yards?!?!??
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 2:16 pm to
I hear ya, but if an off the shelf rifle is more then capable of sub MOA, then why not strive for it?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram