- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mossberg Shockwave for home defense??
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:16 pm to texag7
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:16 pm to texag7
quote:
The minishells are fine for home defense. Their slug version is 385 grains moving at 1150-1200 fps.
That's more energy than pretty much any common home defense pistol caliber (over 3x the energy of a standard 9mm).
Measurements of energy make for something that's easy compare. But what's important is not energy calculations, but how well a round stops the fight. I wouldn't use any self defense round based on energy calculations or whether someone thinks it sounds like a good idea. Are there any reports on the effectiveness of the mini-shells? Are there any law enforcement agencies using them? If so, how are the results? I've got an open mind, but I'm not going to abandon a proven winner for a good idea.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:21 pm to TigerOnThe Hill
quote:
Are there any law enforcement agencies using them?
The military doesn't use HP rounds either. Does this make them bad for civilians?
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:30 pm to TigerOnThe Hill
quote:
Are there any law enforcement agencies using them?
I doubt it because they are not common. I rarely see them in stores and they are expensive. Doesn't mean they are not effective though.
It's a 385 grain foster type slug moving 1200 fps.
Here's it blowing thru your standard drywall and 16" of gel.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:39 pm to texag7
quote:
Doesn't mean they are not effective though.
No one will know how effective they are until there's some experience w/ them. Objective tests comparing them to other known fight stoppers might provide a hint.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:43 pm to TigerOnThe Hill
It's simple physics. Hundreds of thousands of people have been killed across history with a lead round ball moving 1,100 fps.
A 385 grain foster slug would do major damage to a human. More than any 9mm, .40 or .45 round
A 385 grain foster slug would do major damage to a human. More than any 9mm, .40 or .45 round
This post was edited on 12/28/17 at 8:48 pm
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:48 pm to brett randall
My opinion is that the shockwave would be better used as a baton or hammer.
And there are much better batons and hammers than the shockwave.
And there are much better batons and hammers than the shockwave.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:53 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:
The military doesn't use HP rounds either. Does this make them bad for civilians?
That has nothing to do with the effectiveness of hollow points, and everything to do with an international agreement.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:07 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
Nevermind
This post was edited on 12/29/17 at 6:01 am
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:10 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:
The military doesn't use HP rounds either. Does this make them bad for civilians?
IIRC I think one of the international treaties bans the use of hollow point or expanding bullets in war. Maybe the Hague or Geneva Convention.
But if not, it might have more to do with the war strategy/logic that it's better to wound an enemy soldier than to kill them as wounding takes more than one soldier out of the fight (the wounded plus however many to get him off the battlefield) and requires more of the enemys resources to deal with the wounded (transport, care, support personel, treatment, etc.). On the other hand, cops use expanding or HP ammo because in a lethal force situation, you need lethal force.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 10:43 pm to texag7
quote:
It’s a 385 grain foster type slug moving 1200 fps.
Here's it blowing thru your standard drywall and 16" of gel.
This may prove it is a powerful round but in no way proves it would be effective for home defense. While powerful and flying fast, when would you want a slug that can pass through that many barriers without breaking up? You want energy transferred INTO your target, not THROUGH your target. The same argument can be made for FMJ ammo - that bullet can be flying 1500fps but if it doesn’t transfer that energy into the target it makes no sense as a defensive round and will simply pass through.
FWIW the buckshot still sounds effective but I would never use that slug in a home defense scenario, and even less so out of a shotgun with no stock. Plus having a single projectile would defeat the purpose of a stockless shotgun that you supposedly don’t need to aim. Try aiming a slug from the hip accurately.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 10:54 pm to bapple
quote:
Try aiming a slug from the hip accurately.
You wouldn't shoot it from the hip. It can be aimed accurately. Thunder Ranch has several videos on using it for self defense and Hickok consistently hit the 80 yard gong with it in his review.
Obviously not the ideal firearm but it would definitely work for home defense. I would pick it over a 6 shot revolver
Aiming example.
This post was edited on 12/28/17 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 12/29/17 at 8:05 am to Propagandalf
quote:
That is very much a pistol grip
While true, I meant more in the way of the AR style pistol grip which shortens the OAL. This looks to be more of a sawed off stock with an end knob which may it feel more balanced versus the AR style with the 18" barrel. I had one twenty+ years ago with the AR style & 18" barrel, while compact, it was front heavy.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 8:46 am to brett randall
Forget the Shockwave and get a Mossberg 500 defense model with 8 in the tube. I bought one about a year ago and it is bullet proof.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:19 am to texag7
quote:
A 385 grain foster slug would do major damage to a human. More than any 9mm, .40 or .45 round
Since it's America you're free to use whatever you want for personal/home defense. Even on the 'net, you're one of the few I've read who would use a shotgun slug for self defense instead of a 9, 40 or 45..
This post was edited on 12/29/17 at 10:33 am
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:35 am to bapple
quote:
This may prove it is a powerful round but in no way proves it would be effective for home defense.
1+
quote:
FWIW the buckshot still sounds effective but I would never use that slug in a home defense scenario,
True.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:45 am to brett randall
As TigerOnTheHill said, it appears that your mind is made up. So the following is for those who might be swayed by your posts:
1. It is extremely rare to find any author with self-defense expertise in an NRA publication. This isn't a knock against the NRA (I'm a Life Member) - it's just common knowledge that you don't go there for SD advice.
2. Greg Ellifritz (long time LEO, long time LE firearms instructor) posted an essay in his blog about two weeks ago on which guns one should have in his "arsenal." A shotgun was the 4th or 5th gun he recommends (after handgun, AR15, etc.). Here's his advice on shotguns for SD:
If you are going to buy a shotgun, you will want either a pump action or semi automatic weapon. The pump action is inherently more reliable, but in practice, I’ve found the semi automatic to be more reliable because it reduces the chance for operator error. With pump action weapons, a shooter under stress is likely to “short stroke” the weapon, meaning he doesn’t pull the pump mechanism fully to the rear when pumping it. This will cause a malfunction.
Do not purchase a shotgun that only has a pistol grip (no stock). Recoil is excessive with only pistol grips and accuracy in non-existent beyond 20 feet. If you want a more portable package, purchase a folding stock. You can shoot it with pistol grips at very close range or extend the stock when more accuracy is needed.
As for pump action shotguns, some of the best models to look at are the Remington Model 870 and the Mossberg Model 500. If you are looking for a semi-automatic, the firearms manufactured by Benelli (M1, M2, M4) and Remington (1100 and 11-87) and Mossberg are the best. Most of these weapons are available with shorter barrels (lighter, quicker, and handier for self defense purposes) and alternate long barrels (better accuracy and range) for hunting. If you can afford to do so, buy both barrels.
There are many misconceptions about the best types of ammunition to use in the shotgun. Essentially, you have three choices: birdshot, buckshot, and slugs. Birdshot is the smallest in size and is normally used for hunting. Because of its small size, penetration with these pellets isn’t as deep. For this reason, some people advocate its use for self defense in the home. The people who advocate its use say that it is less likely to penetrate walls and hit other people in the house. The fact that birdshot doesn’t penetrate deeply is well known, and it is true that birdshot is less likely to penetrate through multiple walls. Despite this potential advantage, I don’t recommend it for self defense. The very lack of penetration that some will use to justify its use, is its primary downfall. If your attacker is well muscled or extremely fat, birdshot may not penetrate deeply enough to reach the vital organs. Sometimes birdshot fails to stop birds.
Even though I don’t recommend birdshot for self defense, you should still have a stockpile of some. It is very good for both practice and for hunting. A few hundred rounds of number four or number six birdshot will be useful additions to your preparations.
Buckshot and slugs should be your primary self defense loads. For most people and ranges size 00 Buckshot will work the best. If you anticipate needing to shoot through intermediate obstacles or at long range, use slugs (single projectiles). Both buckshot and slugs recoil more than birdshot. There are “low recoil” cartridges available, but they may not work in all semi-automatic shotguns.
1. It is extremely rare to find any author with self-defense expertise in an NRA publication. This isn't a knock against the NRA (I'm a Life Member) - it's just common knowledge that you don't go there for SD advice.
2. Greg Ellifritz (long time LEO, long time LE firearms instructor) posted an essay in his blog about two weeks ago on which guns one should have in his "arsenal." A shotgun was the 4th or 5th gun he recommends (after handgun, AR15, etc.). Here's his advice on shotguns for SD:
If you are going to buy a shotgun, you will want either a pump action or semi automatic weapon. The pump action is inherently more reliable, but in practice, I’ve found the semi automatic to be more reliable because it reduces the chance for operator error. With pump action weapons, a shooter under stress is likely to “short stroke” the weapon, meaning he doesn’t pull the pump mechanism fully to the rear when pumping it. This will cause a malfunction.
Do not purchase a shotgun that only has a pistol grip (no stock). Recoil is excessive with only pistol grips and accuracy in non-existent beyond 20 feet. If you want a more portable package, purchase a folding stock. You can shoot it with pistol grips at very close range or extend the stock when more accuracy is needed.
As for pump action shotguns, some of the best models to look at are the Remington Model 870 and the Mossberg Model 500. If you are looking for a semi-automatic, the firearms manufactured by Benelli (M1, M2, M4) and Remington (1100 and 11-87) and Mossberg are the best. Most of these weapons are available with shorter barrels (lighter, quicker, and handier for self defense purposes) and alternate long barrels (better accuracy and range) for hunting. If you can afford to do so, buy both barrels.
There are many misconceptions about the best types of ammunition to use in the shotgun. Essentially, you have three choices: birdshot, buckshot, and slugs. Birdshot is the smallest in size and is normally used for hunting. Because of its small size, penetration with these pellets isn’t as deep. For this reason, some people advocate its use for self defense in the home. The people who advocate its use say that it is less likely to penetrate walls and hit other people in the house. The fact that birdshot doesn’t penetrate deeply is well known, and it is true that birdshot is less likely to penetrate through multiple walls. Despite this potential advantage, I don’t recommend it for self defense. The very lack of penetration that some will use to justify its use, is its primary downfall. If your attacker is well muscled or extremely fat, birdshot may not penetrate deeply enough to reach the vital organs. Sometimes birdshot fails to stop birds.
Even though I don’t recommend birdshot for self defense, you should still have a stockpile of some. It is very good for both practice and for hunting. A few hundred rounds of number four or number six birdshot will be useful additions to your preparations.
Buckshot and slugs should be your primary self defense loads. For most people and ranges size 00 Buckshot will work the best. If you anticipate needing to shoot through intermediate obstacles or at long range, use slugs (single projectiles). Both buckshot and slugs recoil more than birdshot. There are “low recoil” cartridges available, but they may not work in all semi-automatic shotguns.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News