re: It's time to ban dog deer hunting

Am I the only one in here who's had other landowners dogs run deer onto me?

quote:

---

, it is now my deer

---

No

I have a fundamental, almost religious problem with somebody calling a wild animal "theirs"

quote:

---

It shows that I have a fundamental problem with people thinking that the amount of money they invest in property gives them the right to call the animals on it theirs.

---

If an animal is on my land, it's mine. You can't come on my land to take it, shoot it, feed it, kill it or have sex with it. Your dog is under your ownership. Control it.

quote:

---

You can already shoot dogs on your property. You are just looking for an excuse to call the deer yours. You going to start branding them and fining the neighbor when he shoots one of "your" deer

---

If you believe this, then you shouldn't have a problem with deer falling under the livestock law. It simply is in place to allow landowners the legal option to shoot invading animals to protect their animals, or what animals are on their property.

Again, you come across as only wanting to protect a way to run deer off bordering properties, onto yours. Showing a complete and utter disregard for neighboring property owners and hunters. How forgiving and pleasant would you be, if hunters from a bordering lease, were consistently found on your property, shouting and hollering, trying to force deer on their land, and using the excuse, well, I didn't see a property line. Oops.

You're so full of shite. Deer wander. They don't belong to anyone. As much as you want them to be those deer on your property are not yours.

quote:

---

How forgiving and pleasant would you be, if hunters from a bordering lease, were consistently found on your property, shouting and hollering, trying to force deer on their land, and using the excuse, well, I didn't see a property line. Oops.

---

A trespasser is a trespasser. It doesn't matter if he has dogs with him.

quote:

---

you come across as only wanting to protect a way to run deer off bordering properties, onto yours

---

I will give you $10,000 if you can find where he said this, or anything that inferred this.

quote:

---

Deer wander. They don't belong to anyone. As much as you want them to be those deer on your property are not yours

---

They're also ran off by dogs. That is the subject at hand. If deer wander onto another property that is stalk only, I have no problem. If they wander onto restricted hunting land, no problem. If they wander onto dog hunting land, no problem... UNLESS, they are ran onto by trespassing dogs. Dogs belong to hunters, they are an extension of them, during a hunt. If they're on my land, the owner is responsible for that, through inaction, disregard for my rights and property. Hell. Maybe they should not only include deer into the livestock law, but turning the dogs into the game wardens, should bring a fine to the owners as well. A bounty of sorts for the dead dogs.

Then why be opposed to including deer into the livestock law? The only thing it does, is give legal permission to shoot the dogs illegally on another property. No reason to be opposed, unless you have an agenda to run your dogs on someone elses property, or too lazy to control them.

quote:

---

The only thing it does, is give legal permission to shoot the dogs illegally on another property

---

You can already do that dumbass

quote:

---

You can already do that dumbass

---

Remind me again, who is making emotional arguments, and who is discussing rationally?

I'm not discussing anything rationally with you until you point out where I said all that shite you accused me of saying or even implying.