Started By
Message

re: Help me pick my elk hunting caliber

Posted on 1/31/15 at 6:34 pm to
Posted by Boats n Hose
NOLA
Member since Apr 2011
37248 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 6:34 pm to
What's this Remington boycott about?
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61758 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 6:38 pm to
300 win mag
Posted by Judge Smails
Native Son of NELA
Member since Mar 2008
5569 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 6:38 pm to
You've forgotten the old OB joke - they didn't leave NY after the fed govt gave them a huge contract and there was mucho outrage over it.
Posted by Boats n Hose
NOLA
Member since Apr 2011
37248 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 6:38 pm to
Ah yea, I remember this now
Posted by 2geaux
Georgia
Member since Feb 2008
2755 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 9:15 pm to
Use what you are most comfortable with. I shot elk at 200yds with .270. However, I use .300 wmag now.
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7567 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 9:18 pm to
DSJ,
You've already put a lot of thought and research into your hunt so that you have a good idea of what you want and don't want. Yeah, under some circumstances a 338 WM might be more gun than you need for elk hunting, but under no circumstance will you be undergunned. OTOH, some of the calibers mentioned that you did not ask about may not be enough elk gun under some circumstances. The 270 Win was my first deer rifle and it's a great gun, but if it's the last day of a paid, special hunt (time away from work/family, travel, hunting licenses, guide fees, etc) and I'm faced w/ a quartering away shot on a big trophy elk at 350 yards away, do I want to be using a 270 Win or a 338 WM??? If I can shoot it sufficiently, I'm going w/ the 338 WM. The other guns you mentioned are good guns, but ammo availability could be more of a problem compared to them w/ the 338 WM. Whichever gun you buy, be sure you practice sufficiently at all reasonable ranges and you should be in good shape.
Posted by WAR TIGER
Death Valley
Member since Oct 2005
4286 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 9:46 pm to
A 350 yard shot with a .243 at an elk is just irresponsible.

Generally, you need 800 foot lbs of energy to kill a deer and 1200 foot lbs to kill an elk. .243 doesn't cut that at 250 yards.

But, check out the energy of the Hornady SST bullets. For a consistent comparison....

A 300 Win Mag at 180 grains has 1928 ft lbs of energy at 500 yards.

A 338 Win Mag at 200 grains has 1904 ft lbs at 500 yards. And 225 grains has 2030 ft lbs at 500 yards.

The recoil from .300 to .338 is a significant difference. Regardless of your claims.....recoil plays a difference in accuracy. If you really want an 8.5 lb gun, I would advise:
300 win mag, or
7 wsm

What I'm suggesting.......is that you should go with 300 win mag.
You keep nearly the same energy with less recoil, and therefore, better accuracy.

My $.02

Good luck!!!
Posted by Bushmaster
19th Hole
Member since Oct 2008
39955 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 10:03 pm to
.338 Lapua

Venom Tactical

Battle tested.
Posted by BIG Texan
Texas
Member since Jun 2012
1727 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 10:09 pm to
30/06 165 grain Hornady superformance . It's easy shooting and very accurate.

Practice, practice, practice.
Posted by Citica8
Duckroost, LA
Member since Dec 2012
4030 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 10:28 pm to
Just looked up the ballistics for .338 Laupa @ 500 yards

285gr - 2966ft-lbs @ 2150ft/sec
250gr - 2048ft-lbs @ 1966ft/sec

Completely unnecessary but that's some pretty gross numbers

.300WM is solid choice if you are looking to buy something new.
Posted by WAR TIGER
Death Valley
Member since Oct 2005
4286 posts
Posted on 1/31/15 at 11:19 pm to
You're talking about an even bigger bullet. Greater recoil.

And even at 250 grains, it's only a difference of 100 ft lbs. still, crazy numbers.

It comes down to ballistic coefficient.

Go .300 win mag. Get some berger hybrids. All you need boss.
Posted by LSU4Life123
Member since Dec 2012
129 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 8:10 am to
270/ shoots long and flat and will take down an elk.
Posted by misterc
St. George
Member since Sep 2014
741 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 11:45 am to
This-
quote:

Practice, practice, practice.


A well placed shot with a 30-06 will do the job, I wouldn't go less than this IMO

I shoot a Sako 300 Win mag with hand loads, I can put 5 in a Softball at 600 on a bench, different story in the woods. I killed a deer dead in its tracks at 595 yards yet never shot an elk nearly that far.

If your hunting at high altitude on foot, be prepared to shoot when physically exhausted. My friend and I ran with a herd for over 2 hours on time, we got a 5x5. Its hard to squeeze a clean shot when your chasing an elk in the mountains on foot, a gun you can shoot well is the most important. I chose the Sako finnlight because its a light gun to carry all day, an extra pound makes a difference.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72047 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 11:49 am to
I'm no elk hunter, but I've always said that if I went it would be with no less than a .30-06

That's why I bought a tikka T3 in .30-06. In the off chance I get to go elk hunting I'll have a very light rifle I can use.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298326 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 11:55 am to
30-06 is sufficient for elk or moose.
Posted by spacewrangler
In my easy chair with my boots on..
Member since Sep 2009
9878 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 12:22 pm to
There have been many elk killed with a. 270 and. 308, if you already have one of those calibers just upgrade your scope to a very fine one and upgrade your ammunition. This way you don't purchase a riffle you will only use once or twice and will have a much better setup for your current ruffle used most often. JMO this is only if you don't plan to make multiple trips that would actually require a larger caliber

Nosler Partition, Nosler Accubond in a Federal premium if you do not handd load. If Handload then use either of those as well 140g in the 270 and 150-165g in 308 will be more than sufficient at those ranges for elk.
This post was edited on 2/1/15 at 12:26 pm
Posted by 178cajun
Member since Mar 2008
499 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 1:31 pm to
Back in my younger days, I was a hunting guide in the Selway of Idaho. You can't have too much gun but you can have too little gun. That said, of all the elk I have seen dead and skint out, a .338 Win mag would be my caliber. Yes, you can kill with smaller caliber a but why take a chance? On Big game, Bigger is better.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298326 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

.338 Win mag would be my caliber.


Posted by spacewrangler
In my easy chair with my boots on..
Member since Sep 2009
9878 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

You can't have too much gun but you can have too little gun.



My response was prefaced with the notion if this is a one time trip and the gun will not be used after the trip then why not just upgrade his optics and ammunition. 300-350yds a 308 or a 270 is plenty of gun to kill an elk. He could get a bad arse scope for the cost of a 338.

If he believes he will, regularly, use the riffle in the future then by all means get a larger caliber; that makes sense.

Chuck Hawks reviews

340 Weatherby

338 Chuck Hawks

chuck Hawks 338 lapua

chuck Hawks 338 Rem
This post was edited on 2/1/15 at 1:50 pm
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17876 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 1:55 pm to
Notable words from a friend when I was choosing my last rifle

"Don't get something that can kill them, get something that will kill them"
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram