Started By
Message

re: Drone Recovery for Deer

Posted on 11/15/25 at 5:16 pm to
Posted by oildog
Member since Jun 2016
92 posts
Posted on 11/15/25 at 5:16 pm to
So how is that law interpreted? If you locate the deer or bear and it is in fact not dead. What must you do at this point?
Posted by Bowstring1
Member since Sep 2016
194 posts
Posted on 11/15/25 at 10:29 pm to
Learn how to hunt and track.It’s a shame how much so-called hunters are relying on technology these days. I don’t wanna lose an animal anymore than the next person, but that is part of what we do unfortunately. That is what should drive you to be a better hunter and tracker. That’s what separates the men from the boys.
Posted by MarshMan
Ponchatoula
Member since May 2015
662 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 7:02 am to
We’ve started using drones for recovery, and let me tell you—this technology changes everything. I know how to track with the best of them, but think about it: when a deer runs off the plot, maybe through a briar patch or into a deep bottom, why crawl through thickets on your hands and knees, leaving scent everywhere and disturbing the woods, just to find out the deer was lying dead right outside the patch?

Why risk blood-trailing a wounded deer and pushing it even farther? Everyone knows that once you jump a wounded deer, your chances of recovery drop dramatically.

Using a drone will open your eyes to how many deer over the years were never recovered—often because hunters walked right past them.

Now, I agree that this technology could be abused, and I support keeping it illegal on public lands. But let’s be honest: due to the cost, 90% of people using drones are private landowners with strict management programs who aren’t abusing them.

Drone recovery is a game-changer, and it’s time to accept new technology. There’s no real difference between using a thermal scope for hog hunting or a .35 Whelen as a “primitive” weapon today.
Posted by 257WBY
Member since Feb 2014
7121 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 7:36 am to
I’ve heard rumors that tv hunters have drone operators sell them their drone scouting info. They’ll find a huge buck, then the celebrity offers the landowner a large sum to lease the farm.
Also hearing rumors of archery elk hunters finding bugling bulls at night to aid in pursuing them the next morning.
I shot a buck in Kansas the other afternoon. It was a bad shot , but he was bleeding heavily and I knew it was lethal. Likely even lethal before dark. I backed out and found him 100 yards away the next day. A drone would’ve made my night much more restful and I could’ve recovered after a few hours.
I think the drone could be great in keeping human scent out of deer sanctuary areas. I also think that drones will be used, regardless of the law. They’ll get smaller, cheaper, and have longer range.
Posted by 257WBY
Member since Feb 2014
7121 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 7:46 am to
From live scopes to cell cams to drones, technology is brutally effective. And it bulldozes over skills that take years to master.
Why do people fly fish and bow hunt? Because there’s an art to it and advanced skill is required. As sportsmen, is that art worth protecting?
Posted by Bowstring1
Member since Sep 2016
194 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 7:56 am to
I agree with you that using a drone for deer recovery could and will be a game changer. To be perfectly honest with you we have three drones in our business operation that we use daily. Not for hunting. But I have seen the abuse. I am aware of people scouting with drones, using drones to push animals toward hunters and other abuses. Also, you make a great point about thermals and the 35 Whelen among other things… the more we allow and tolerate the redefining of what the original laws were the more it takes away from what it is that we do. Modern Day archery equipment is a prime example. do we really even need to have special seasons? If it is all about the utmost respect to the animals then why don’t we just use drones to kill them
Posted by Bowstring1
Member since Sep 2016
194 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 7:57 am to
Exactly!
Posted by SCwTiger
armpit of 'merica
Member since Aug 2014
6841 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

how could it be a bad thing?

Too many unethical possibilities and not enough integrity in society anymore.
Posted by 257WBY
Member since Feb 2014
7121 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 8:41 am to
It wouldn’t surprise me if armed drones were used for depredation tags in the future.
Posted by jpainter6174
Boss city
Member since Feb 2014
6230 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 10:24 am to
So because someone COULD use it irresponsibly and unethically we should ban it for everybody, got it…

Makes total sense, let’s ban guns while we’re at it!
Posted by Bowstring1
Member since Sep 2016
194 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 11:25 am to
Your five-year-old was hunting with a bow?
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60516 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 11:27 am to
quote:

know a couple of folks who are using drones to look for bait offshore
if you could hook up live scope to it…,

I have zero issues w using it however you choose, but can’t think of a single reason why it can’t be used to recover game. Hell use it to find wounded ducks, I don’t know if they give off much of a signal, but for those without dogs it would help conservation
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram