re: Buying a handgun

quote:

---

Your definitions are meaningless and make no sense. They make no difference whatsoever in these discussions. They are useful to show how much of an arrogant prick you are though.

---

Please excuse the numbering system. But it's the only way I keep track of the plethora of asinine comments.

1. Those are not "my" definitions. As has been noted, you're the guy making up definitions. The terms I use are used by manufacturers and gunsmiths (i.e. people with experience), none of whom uses your "second strike" definition.

2. Is "arrogant prick" better than or worse than "frickstick'?

quote:

---

Sweet. A man who uses a numbered list with the same lack of point in each is going there.

Look. You're just not very smart. You've gone a long ways with guns and should be applauded for that. Here is just some guy who has never even shot any of these guns getting you so say ridiculous things. You're debating someone who has fired a pistol twice

---

You seem to be missing the irony here.

1. You're the guy wanting to debate a topic about which you have admitted you know nothing..

2. If you've fired pistols only twice, what on earth qualifies you to render opinions on, and argue ad nauseam on, issues about which you admittedly have no knowledge or experience? Maybe instead of playing "debate boy" you will answer this question.

quote:

---

The funniest part is, you don't even recognize the problem of classifying the "safe action". You act like there is some sort of coscensus. Yes, you're a frickstick.

---

1. "Safe Action" is a marketing term introduced by Glock.

2. Yes, there is consensus among those who have knowledge of and understand firearms.

3. Is "frickstick" better than or worse than "shite head"?

Please understand that I don't care (and presume that very few others do) what gun you buy. If you were to make a lousy and/or uninformed choice, that would fall under the heading of "play stupid games, win stupid prizes."

I guess one of my many failings is to be concerned when the blind want to lead the blind in matters that relate to personal defense. The consequences to those whom you wish to lead might be severe.

I will admit to having difficulty in determining when you are posting childish opinions just to stir people up, and when you are posting dumb things you really believe. Unfortunately, the folks who might attach some significance to your opinions might have the same problem. (after all, as you acknowledged, your "high post count" is awfully misleading when you post on topics about which you know little or nothing.)

It's obvious that you enjoy your role as a keyboard commando. So, in an effort to avoid curtailing your pleasure, I'll try to refrain from "feeding the troll" when I read your "gun expert" posts -- especially when I can ascertain that you are just, in essence, just amusing yourself when you post uninformed opinions.