Started By
Message

re: Bill to ban dogs in truck beds passes out of committee

Posted on 4/14/14 at 9:45 pm to
Posted by ComicTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2005
992 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 9:45 pm to
listen idiots, if you have a dog, you have chosen to be responsible for that dog. You are that dogs daddy. The dog cannot make choices for itself. You choose to put the dog in harms way if you choose to put it in the truck bed.

and I really laugh at the dumbass who rejects the only guy bringing sources and numbers to the argument. You asked for it, he brought it and then you reject. Get. the. frick. out of here with that weak minded bs.

again, the dog is your responsibility. don't like it? don't have the dog. don't want to take care of it in a grown up way? don't have it and stick to ant farms. this isn't the govt telling you how to live your live. It's society telling you how to act like an adult instead of the child you want to be.

and what's humorous about this is that many advocating the I'll Treat My Dog How I Want are the same ones that advocate for other humans needing to grow up and fend for themselves and stop living off the gubmint.

Hypocrites.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 9:59 pm to
Whew...

Here we go...

quote:

You are that dogs daddy


I am that dog's owner. Big difference

quote:

You choose to put the dog in harms way if you choose to put it in the truck bed.


It's my dog and that's my choice. Hog dogs get "put in harm's way" every day they go to work. So do TONS of other hunting dogs. Should we ban them as well? I bet more dogs die from hog tusks than catapulting out the bed of trucks.

quote:

ou asked for it, he brought it and then you reject. Get. the. frick. out of here with that weak minded bs.


He brought numbers from the humane society to support his argument that bad things happen to dogs in the back of trucks. I think that's a little biased. If I post numbers from bantoiletpaper.com supporting my argument that toilet paper is bad, I think I'll largely get rejected.

quote:

this isn't the govt telling you how to live your live


It sure does look like it is

quote:

It's society telling you how to act like an adult instead of the child you want to be.


Hell of a reach there

quote:

and what's humorous about this is that many advocating the I'll Treat My Dog How I Want are the same ones that advocate for other humans needing to grow up and fend for themselves and stop living off the gubmint.

Hypocrites.


I'm not sure what this means.

ETA: And don't call people idiots without proofreading your post.
This post was edited on 4/14/14 at 10:00 pm
Posted by Pepperidge
Slidell
Member since Apr 2011
4311 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

I am that dog's owner. Big difference



Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
19685 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 10:06 pm to
quote:


I am that dog's owner. Big difference 


Pretty much just ended it all right there DS.
Posted by tenfoe
Member since Jun 2011
6846 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 10:06 pm to
No, you fricking listen you idiot.

I don't give a shite what you do to your own dog, just like I don't give a shite how often you frick your sister. Just don't tell me how to treat my dog, or how to frick your sister. You see the difference you dense bastard?
Posted by Beer Genius
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2013
233 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

No, you fricking listen you idiot.

I don't give a shite what you do to your own dog, just like I don't give a shite how often you frick your sister. Just don't tell me how to treat my dog, or how to frick your sister. You see the difference you dense bastard?




Posted by Boats n Hose
NOLA
Member since Apr 2011
37248 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 10:59 pm to
I don't really care. I ain't sticking my dog unrestrained in my truck bed on i10, I would hope most would do the same.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20406 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 12:00 am to
quote:

No, you fricking listen you idiot.

I don't give a shite what you do to your own dog, just like I don't give a shite how often you frick your sister. Just don't tell me how to treat my dog, or how to frick your sister. You see the difference you dense bastard?

LOL you seem like a cool dude bro
Posted by Tail Dragger
Member since Aug 2012
344 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 7:27 am to
[quote]I'm with you balls . Our fat arse little rep needs to vote against this . One thing that is guaranteed is he's gonna go whichever way Francis tells him to

This ^^^^^
Posted by YellowMouthJunkie
South LA
Member since Dec 2012
77 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 7:36 am to
quote:

I don't really care. I ain't sticking my dog unrestrained in my truck bed on i10, I would hope most would do the same.


This. My dog loves to ride in the bed of my truck but I always have her in with a short leash and the brace that goes around her chest. However that is just when we are going somewheres quick, if we're on the interstate- she's in a crate.
Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34377 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:03 am to
I know of one case where a friend had a dog that stayed in the back of his truck a lot and became very territorial.

Had to be careful walking by, she would bite if you were too close.

Hardly an epidemic that would warrant a law though.
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:24 am to
If you look at the issue from a more simple point of view consider the dog a "load".

"The load on any vehicle shall be securely fastened so as to prevent the covering or load from becoming loose, detached, or in any manner a hazard to other users of the highway."

It's illegal to leave a washer unsecured in the back of your vehicle. Why should a dog be any different?

This legislation is hardly a government intrusion. Government intrusion would be if they wanted to ticket you for leaving the dog loose in the bed of your truck while driving on your own property. Government intrusion is raiding a guy's house because he bought fertilizer and had a high electric bill. Asking a person to secure the dog in the bed of a truck is no where near government intrusion.

This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 8:31 am
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32021 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:33 am to
i will probably get ridiculed but in okay with the law
Posted by tenfoe
Member since Jun 2011
6846 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:38 am to
quote:

The load on any vehicle shall be securely fastened so as to prevent the covering or load from becoming loose, detached, or in any manner a hazard to other users of the highway."

It's illegal to leave a washer unsecured in the back of your vehicle. Why should a dog be any different?


If that's the case, why do we need another law? My point is that we have enough goddam laws, not enough people with common sense, and an overabundance of idiots. Our representatives need to concentrate on solving real problems. If someone wants to dress a dog up in sweaters for pictures let him do it. If the same man wants to shoot that dog for tearing up his new pair of boots he should be able to do that also.
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:38 am to
Like others have said, these idiots have much more important stuff to worry about.

quote:


It's my dog and that's my choice. Hog dogs get "put in harm's way" every day they go to work. So do TONS of other hunting dogs. Should we ban them as well? I bet more dogs die from hog tusks than catapulting out the bed of trucks


That is what I see as the real problem. These bleeding hearts are willing to let the govt tell them how they have to live and it won't stop with this. People are really clueless about what they are doing. I would rather a few dogs die from jumping out of a truck than have more laws telling me how to handle my dog but that's just me.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 8:41 am
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:39 am to
quote:

It's illegal to leave a washer unsecured in the back of your vehicle. Why should a dog be any different?


Well it looks like we already have a law
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:42 am to
So you're for an amendment just not a new law. Glad that's finally cleared up.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 8:43 am
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:44 am to
quote:

So your for an amendment just not a new law. Glad that's finally cleared up

I believe he's saying if your point is valid that it is the same thing, than the law would need nothing. Otherwise the point isn't valid.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:45 am to
quote:

So you're for an amendment just not a new law.


Nope. Dogs are property just like washing machines.

And the word "Secured" could be debated
Posted by Boats n Hose
NOLA
Member since Apr 2011
37248 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:46 am to
quote:

i will probably get ridiculed but in okay with the law


Yea it doesn't really bother me. Kinda like a seatbelt law.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram