Started By
Message

re: Best Deer Hunting WMA in Louisiana

Posted on 12/11/19 at 1:28 pm to
Posted by MrRooster2You
Broussard
Member since Aug 2014
79 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 1:28 pm to
I've seen more deer hunting 2 weeks in the Midwest the past 2 years then the rest of my life. My point is that Louisiana has that same potential but there are glaring issues, that could be easily corrected, preventing that.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11488 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 1:34 pm to
Salmon is a born contrarian. It is his Tigerdroppings shtick.
Posted by Mr Wonderful
Love City
Member since Oct 2015
1045 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

The crappy public land management is because of the crappy hunters we have.

quote:

Limits and land management will never change as long as the "it's brown, it's down" army is the majority of hunters in Louisiana.
quote:

when the dumbass public

You know how to drastically reduce the amount of these kind of people hunting public land? Charge more than $15 to whack 6 one-year old deer. It’s almost as though you recognize the problem, yet don’t want to do anything about it.

Hunting is not a right. It’s a privilege. You have to pay for privileges. Sorry if you can’t afford a few hundred bucks a year to hunt. Or whatever it takes to properly staff and manage WMAs.
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 1:40 pm
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81730 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Not hunt an entire year and never see deer.
I did that two season on an NWR. The feds ruined the place. At least they finally admitted it.
Posted by Mr Wonderful
Love City
Member since Oct 2015
1045 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Ground meat done got expensive at the store.

You’d get more meat off the deer if you’d let it get a little bigger than 35 lbs.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19625 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 1:48 pm to
I would have no problem paying more to hunt public land if it was managed better. I already do it to hunt public in other states. Matter of fact this will be the first year that I wont get a LA hunting license or hunt in LA at all.
Posted by TunaTime
LA
Member since Aug 2012
772 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

You’d get more meat off the deer if you’d let it get a little bigger than 35 lbs.

The last 35lb deer i shot i just threw the whole thing in the crockpot baw.
Posted by Mr Wonderful
Love City
Member since Oct 2015
1045 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

The last 35lb deer i shot i just threw the whole thing in the crockpot baw.


Sure do taste better than those nasty arse ducks.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12722 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

It’s almost as though you recognize the problem, yet don’t want to do anything about it.

The problem is you think it's as simple as raising a license fee. You damn well know if the commission proposed such an action the public outcry would be overwhelmingly opposed to it. It would never happen.

quote:

Sorry if you can’t afford a few hundred bucks a year to hunt. Or whatever it takes to properly staff and manage WMAs.

I can afford it no problem. But you are still failing to see my whole point. People are comparing our public lands to states out west, which is the most ridiculous comparison that can be made. Colorado generated $70 million in revenue from license sales 2 years ago. Gee, I wonder why they have such a well funded department? And assuming their STATE-OWNED public lands are as good as people keep saying, that also makes sense, since of the 23 million acres, they only have to worry about 550k. But they get all of those license sales from people hunting the other 22.5 million acres of federally-owned land. And 83k non-resident hunters (we had ~9600 NR/LA Native/Military licenses sold in 2017).

That's never going to happen here. There were ~36k WMA Permits purchased in 2017; 113k big game license holders. Now throw in bow (27k), duck (54k), and Senior H/F (121k) and you have the 5 most purchased licenses in LA. Throw in basic hunt (152k), and you know what that generated? A whopping $5.3 million.

Why don't we charge more for EVERYTHING? It's not like we are spending a fortune on licenses. Doubling the big game and WMA would generate another $2 million.

But again, you aren't getting anywhere near the Colorado comparison being made. 500k licenses netted them $70 million in 2017. The roughly 500k licenses that we sold netted us $5.3 million. You can't make up that gap just by increasing license sales. It's impossible.

Honestly, the best thing we could do is pass a sales tax like Missouri. That would generate considerably more funding than any license fee increases could. I'm all for increasing license fees, but it can't be the only mechanism.

And this state is so afraid to give anymore money to the government, neither of those things will ever happen.
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 2:24 pm
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83630 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

I've seen more deer hunting 2 weeks in the Midwest the past 2 years then the rest of my life. My point is that Louisiana has that same potential but there are glaring issues, that could be easily corrected, preventing that.


this is more to do with seasons and limit, rather than public land mismanagement

Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83630 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Salmon is a born contrarian. It is his Tigerdroppings shtick.


what?

stating my own experiences makes me a contrarian?

I hunt LA public land. A LOT. I've hunted it my entire life. I grew up in the middle of it. I consider myself knowledgeable on this subject.

And in my experience, LA public land is far better now than it was in the 90s and early 2000s

I can't speak to before then, but if my Dad is right, it was even worse in the 70s
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19625 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:26 pm to
Well considering season lengths and limits are part of management and the deer herd is a public resource I would say it sort of is.

With all of the funding coming from license sales the state will never do anything to decrease sale numbers. It is a slowly eroding cycle that will continue to degrade/hinder our state public lands.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83630 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Well considering season lengths and limits are part of management and the deer herd is a public resource I would say it sort of is.


well this extends to private land as well

my main gripe with LA is that our gun season is far too long

which is why I enjoy hunting the bow only WMAs, which unsurprisingly, are also some of the best
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11488 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

my main gripe with LA is that our gun season is far too long



I agree with this. I also think some of the "primitive" weapons are laughable.
Posted by Canard Gris
All over
Member since Jan 2015
97 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

You can drive a camaro in russell sage and walk 50 yards from the vehicle and start hunting. I wish we had LESS access


Thank you. The amount of access on a lot of these WMA's is absolutely ridiculous. On most of them, you can't even get a half mile away from a road or ATV trail. I have no clue why ATVs are even allowed on these WMAs. LDWF could improve the quality of the experience on public lands just by reducing access.

What do you expect to get out of LDWF when the Governor of the state thinks that someone like Charlie Melancon is the man to head up the state wildlife agency? It starts at the top with leadership.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19625 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:39 pm to
Gun season is too long, limits too liberal and certain WMAs should have age/antler restrictions. Would also love to see a lottery system used is some areas of some WMAs.

We have several large enough and quality WMAs to install 10-15K acrea lottery areas that have higher restrictions and are more intensely managed.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83630 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:47 pm to
I'd be fine with making all WMAs being bow only with a select few (the larger ones) having like a week long lottery gun seasons

I say that as a completely biased bowhunter
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 2:47 pm
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81730 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

I'd be fine with making all WMAs being bow only
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83630 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:49 pm to
I felt like I had to throw the gun hunters a bone...
Posted by MrRooster2You
Broussard
Member since Aug 2014
79 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 2:58 pm to
Which ones are bow only? Aside from like a Thanksgiving weekend gun hunt. I know Loggy Bayou is like that.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram