Started By
Message

re: You are Kyle Rittenhouse...what do you do now?

Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:24 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298906 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:24 pm to
quote:


This kid sucks. He is an entitled little shite who thought he could just start shooting people that had nothing to do with him
'


Commies sure get upset when one of their own (Child molester) bleeds out through the penis.
This post was edited on 11/11/21 at 2:25 pm
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138898 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

This kid sucks. He is an entitled little shite who thought he could just start shooting people that had nothing to do with him and get away with it. Maybe he will. He deserves zero attention though when the Epstein trial is under way.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45919 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

He is an entitled little shite who thought he could just start shooting people that had nothing to do with him and get away with it


Look, another fricking idiot who knows absolutely nothing about the case and hasn't watched any of the trial.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19557 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

He is an entitled little shite who thought he could just start shooting people that had nothing to do with him and get away with it.



What is it with the clowns and the retarded hot takes like this? Do you morons simply not have the ability to grasp the facts as presented in trial?
This post was edited on 11/11/21 at 2:25 pm
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29105 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Not when the "active shooter" is not actively threatening you and is in fact in retreat.

You can't be an "active shooter" when you are in fact not actively shooting and are in retreat at all times.

So no, Kyle can not be considered an "active shooter" in any way, shape or form.
Something tells me that if a left-winger had just killed two people and was still armed with a loaded rifle, you would probably consider him to be an "active shooter" and would have no problem with him being killed at this point.
quote:

So if you're claiming Grosskreutz has a right to self defense by being the aggressor
Can we agree that Grosskreutz probably should not have taken up arms and inserted himself into a bad situation?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298906 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Do you morons simply not have the ability to grasp the facts as presented in trial?
This post was edited on 11/11 at 2:25 pm



His/her sources are the ones blaming the judge.


Communists blame everyone but the actual perp.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298906 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Can we agree that Grosskreutz probably should not have taken up arms and inserted himself into a bad situation?


Seeing the result, bad choice.

SHows what happens when pussies buy guns and get outgunned.

He even had the draw on Kyle and still lost. So yes, he chose poorly
This post was edited on 11/11/21 at 2:28 pm
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19470 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

This kid sucks. He is an entitled little shite who thought he could just start shooting people that had nothing to do with him and get away with it. Maybe he will. He deserves zero attention though when the Epstein trial is under way.



Well, that's certainly one take on the situation. Your hook is probably too shiny on that one
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138898 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Can we agree that Grosskreutz probably should not have taken up arms and inserted himself into a bad situation?

Can we agree that the "nobody should've been there that night" argument is a load of horseshite and is completely fricking irrelevant?
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:28 pm to
quote:



This kid sucks. He is an entitled little shite who thought he could just start shooting people that had nothing to do with him and get away with it. Maybe he will. He deserves zero attention though when the Epstein trial is under way.



Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45919 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Something tells me that if a left-winger had just killed two people and was still armed with a loaded rifle, you would probably consider him to be an "active shooter" and would have no problem with him being killed at this point.


Not if he's retreating and presenting no further threat.

quote:

Can we agree that Grosskreutz probably should not have taken up arms


No. He has the right to be armed.

quote:

and inserted himself into a bad situation?


The only time he inserted himself into a bad situation is when he charged at another person unprovoked, while the person was in retreat, and pulled his handgun and pointed at said retreating person. Hence making him an aggressor.



Posted by Dominate308
South Florida
Member since Jan 2013
2895 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:29 pm to
My first order of business would be a civil rights lawsuit. The police, DA and anyone else I could add.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298906 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Something tells me that if a left-winger had just killed two people and was still armed with a loaded rifle, you would probably consider him to be an "active shooter"



I would definitely not charge in if I was as dumb, ignorant and terrible with firearms as your hero.

Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
24837 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Korkstand

I get it. Playing the role of posters like Spleen with his “I don’t care” or “he’s not guilty but he shouldn’t have been there” isn’t very interesting. Won’t gather as many bites as you would typically like
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19470 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Something tells me that if a left-winger had just killed two people and was still armed with a loaded rifle, you would probably consider him to be an "active shooter" and would have no problem with him being killed at this point.


I guess that would depend on the left winger's actions. Did he only shoot in self defense? Was he actively engaged in trying to kill people?
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

This kid sucks. He is an entitled little shite who thought he could just start shooting people that had nothing to do with him and get away with it. Maybe he will. He deserves zero attention though when the Epstein trial is under way.

Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29105 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Can we agree that the "nobody should've been there that night" argument is a load of horseshite and is completely fricking irrelevant?
It's irrelevant to the charges, absolutely. But it is, or should be (IMO), relevant to our perception of these people. There are no heroes here.

Again, I do NOT believe Rittenhouse should be convicted of murder. I just think it's absurd to idolize him and what he did.
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
6900 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

You have way more faith than I do in 12 random individuals reaching 6 uniform verdicts.
Wouldn't just 1 have to vote for acquittal? It's a murder trial not a lawsuit.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298906 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

, relevant to our perception of these people.


Every single one started from the same place.
Your relativity shite is just a smoke screen. You can say Kyle didn't need to be there, then where the frick were you during the riots that caused this incident telling those people they were "stupid" to be protesting?


Youre view is 100% based on left wing ideology you read on Reddit. You're a hypocrite.

This post was edited on 11/11/21 at 2:37 pm
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138898 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

It's irrelevant to the charges, absolutely. But it is, or should be (IMO), relevant to our perception of these people. There are no heroes here.

Again, I do NOT believe Rittenhouse should be convicted of murder. I just think it's absurd to idolize him and what he did.


I don't necessarily think he should be idolized either, but I can absolutely see why he is. Here's a kid who, however naive or idealistic you think he may be, took a stand when the the "adults" refused to and continued to allow cities across the country to be destroyed. To act like this kid just showed up to a riot to shoot people is completely disingenuous, especially given the fact that he had been there all day cleaning up the mess the rioters left and asking people if they needed medical attention right before all this went down. Again, he was doing the job that politicians and local officials were too cowardly to do.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 25
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 25Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram