- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WWII hypothetical: could Britain have defeated Germany by itself after June 1940
Posted on 4/25/16 at 9:05 pm to doubleb
Posted on 4/25/16 at 9:05 pm to doubleb
quote:
The French were ferocious in protecting the English rear and they were a large part of the reason so many Brits escaped.
I got massively downvoted for making this same point in a thread on here awhile back. Denigration of the French is VERY popular.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 9:05 pm to Darth_Vader
Man I just wanna say this is one of the most interesting threads I've ever clicked on here. Props you guys. How y'all know all this shite? Lol
Posted on 4/25/16 at 9:29 pm to ChewyDante
quote:
Denigration of the French is VERY popular.
Can we agree their command and control sucked in the Battle of France? As well as their philosophy of armor deployment?
Posted on 4/25/16 at 9:32 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
They took all the P-39's we could ship to them. Sure as hell, no US pilot wanted to go to war in them
This is because of the different style of air warfare on the eastern front than what was being fought on the western front.
On the a western front you had high altitude fights due to the ongoing bomber offensive being carried out around the clock by British Bomber Command and the American 8th Air Force. These heavy bombers attacked at very high altitude which meant the German fighters operated at high altitude to intercept those bombers. Thus, on the Western Front the Allies needed fighters with excellent high altitude performance to escort the bombers. This was the P39's main weakness, it's high altitude performance was piss poor.
On the Eastern Fromt things were different. There was no strategic bomber offensive on either side. Instead the air battles were on a tactical level where medium bombers and ground attack aircraft operated at at most medium altitude and most often at low altitude. This in turn meant most fighters likewise stayed at lower altitudes. And this is where the P39 shined. While the "Airacobra" had piss poor high altitude performance, it's low altitude performance was excellent. Add in the fact it had devastating firepower and, thanks to center mounted cannon, was easy to hit targets accurately, you see why the Soviets loved it.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 9:38 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
This is because of the different style of air warfare on the eastern front than what was being fought on the western front.
I know this. The Airacobra didn't exactly shine in the Pacific, either.
Of course, that's because the powers that were opted for the cheaper, single-stage supercharger, which killed performance at altitude.
This post was edited on 4/25/16 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 4/25/16 at 9:44 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Can we agree their command and control sucked in the Battle of France? As well as their philosophy of armor deployment?
You hit the nail on the head. These two things you mentioned played huge roles in the French defeat in 1940. Their command failed time and again. First by falling for the German ruse and pushing the bulk of the best French and British formations into Belgium, which only stuck their necks further in the noose. To the absurd " Saar offensive", to allowing so many troops to sit and do nothing in the Maginot line while the German Panzers broke through at Sedan. The French command stumbled from blunder to blunder from start to finish.
And as for the French tanks. Tank for tank they were better than their German counterparts. But this advantage was wasted by having the French tanks spread out to support the infantry. The French belatedly tried to address this issue by forming armored divisions. Of course it was too late by then.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 9:49 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Of course it was too late by then.
Constantly behind the curve.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 9:51 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
I know this. The Airacobra didn't exactly shine in the Pacific, either.
Of course, that's because the powers that were opted for the cheaper, single-stage supercharger, which killed performance at altitude
I don't even know if it would have fit, especially considering the odd engine placement of the P39 behind the pilot. But I wonder how this plane could have shined if they'd have mounted the Merlin in her?
Look what it did for the P51. Before swapping to the Merlin engine, the P51 was not that great of a fighter and like the P39 it had piss poor performance at high altitudes. But once they started mounting the Merlin in the Mustang... Well, the rest is history.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 9:59 pm to Darth_Vader
The Brits really liked the Allison-powered Mustang, rightfully so. The A-36 version was a very capable ground-attack aircraft in Italy.
But the Merlin-powered Mustang was better than anyone thought it could be.
But the Merlin-powered Mustang was better than anyone thought it could be.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 10:09 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
But the Merlin-powered Mustang was better than anyone thought it could be
Probably the best piston driven fighter of the war.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 10:16 pm to Darth_Vader
I'd remove the 'probably'. While other fighters may have been superior in one area or another, the Mustang scored very high in every area.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 10:19 pm to ChewyDante
quote:
Rommel
The Desert Fox is the greatest German of all time.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 10:22 pm to FightinTigersDammit
I
True. But you know there's a lot of fans of planes like the Spitfire, Hellcat, and Corsair that would argue the point until their face turned blue.
quote:
I'd remove the 'probably'. While other fighters may have been superior in one area or another, the Mustang scored very high in every area
True. But you know there's a lot of fans of planes like the Spitfire, Hellcat, and Corsair that would argue the point until their face turned blue.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 10:39 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
But you know there's a lot of fans of planes like the Spitfire, Hellcat, and Corsair that would argue the point until their face turned blue.
That's what makes message boards.
But the Spit had no range, the Hellcat was at least 40mph slower...Corsair vs. Mustang would be a pretty good matchup, though.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 10:42 pm to FightinTigersDammit
Somewhere out there is a British dude, old sailor and an old marine all pissed off at you right now.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 10:44 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Corsair vs. Mustang would be a pretty good matchup, though.
Corsair was a good plane - maybe even a great plane, but the Mustang was just the next level. It had several years of development/refinement of the design during the war. By the time it arrived in Europe, the Germans knew their days of seriously contesting control of the skies were over.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 10:49 pm to The Boat
quote:
The Desert Fox is the greatest German of all time.
From all accounts he was an honorable officer. Too bad he fought for the wrong side, but that's the breaks.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 10:51 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Somewhere out there is a British dude, old sailor and an old marine all pissed off at you right now.
No doubt about it!
But I did give props to the Corsair.
Brits and sailors have to face reality.
Posted on 4/25/16 at 10:54 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
By the time it arrived in Europe, the Germans knew their days of seriously contesting control of the skies were over.
Fat Hermann himself said "When I saw the Mustangs over Berlin, I knew the jig was up".
Posted on 4/25/16 at 11:07 pm to RidiculousHype
No. I bust GB in the arse every time with a quick attack after France and before Russia is Axis & Allies and Hearts of Iron. Imperical evidence says it's impossible.
Popular
Back to top


1






